XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Drivers for recent homelab NICs in XCP-ng 8.2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    41 Posts 12 Posters 10.3k Views 10 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team @ajpri1998
      last edited by

      @ajpri1998 I don't know. I assumed @Andrew built version 3.8.7 for a reason since we already had version 3.8.4 by default in 8.2.

      He wrote it adds many device IDs, so I believe that if your NIC was already working, the updated driver is not necessary for you.

      However, your feedback would remain useful: if the NIC works with the updated driver, it helps validating the build. Then you can remove it and go back to the main driver to avoid unnecessary customizations.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        I moved the drivers RPMs mentioned above to the xcp-ng-updates repository, so it's not necessary anymore to add --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing to install them.

        Being in xcp-ng-updates doesn't mean they will get installed automatically next time you update. No dependency will pull them on your 8.2 hosts unless you explicitly ask to install them, with yum install.

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • S Offline
          Strebor @stormi
          last edited by Strebor

          @stormi
          Do you mean that if I install i225 driver, next time I do โ€œyum updateโ€ within 8.2, I loose the driver (leaving host without network connection), or do you mean the driver will not be added when I in the future do an upgrade to 8.3 (or for instance 8.2.x)? As these drives are in 8.3, that should not cause a problem, correct?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team
            last edited by stormi

            I only mean that, if you are on XCP-ng 8.2 and haven't installed the drivers, updating the hosts will not force-install the drivers to your hosts. In other words, it's not because a package is made available in the updates repository that it is necessarily selected by RPM dependencies to update all XCP-ng 8.2 hosts that install official updates.

            But if you choose to install such packages, then they will remain (at least until a full upgrade using the installation ISO).

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • S Offline
              Strebor @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi
              Thanks!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N Offline
                nhurion
                last edited by

                Hi,

                I'm new to xcp-ng and coming back to linux after about a 20 years break (so my knowledge is either very recent, or very old).

                I have a new fanless computer with intel i226 chips, I'm trying to install xcp-ng on it but I can't find out how.

                I have the 8.2.1 iso on a bootable usb, already used it to install on 2 older hosts.
                I have downloaded the rpm and added it to the Packages directory but the installer refuses to go because I have no ethernet cards.
                So I guess I need to somehow add the driver with the F9 menu on the first screen, but I have no clue how. When I try it say that no drivers were detected.

                I've also tried extracting the ko file from the rpm and put it on the usb, but it is not automatically loaded and not detected by the F9 menu, so I guess it's in wrong location

                Is there a guide somewhere on how to do that ?

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  Andrew Top contributor @nhurion
                  last edited by

                  @nhurion Use the new 8.3 version. It has newer drivers.

                  N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N Offline
                    nhurion @Andrew
                    last edited by

                    @Andrew
                    Thanks, I know this is an option.
                    However, I already have 2 hosts with 8.2.1 that I do not want to upgrade yet.
                    And even if I install another iso, I would still like to know how to be able to load a driver or add a driver to an existing iso.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      Andrew Top contributor @nhurion
                      last edited by

                      @nhurion If you boot 8.3 does everything work correctly? Just as a test.

                      The official 8.2 boot ISO does not have i225/i226 drivers. I did build an unofficial one that has drivers...

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N Offline
                        nhurion @Andrew
                        last edited by

                        @Andrew
                        Yes, installing from 8.3-apha2 does work.

                        Now if there is an option to load an additional driver, I guess there is a way to get that driver added.
                        How do I do that ?

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          Andrew Top contributor @nhurion
                          last edited by

                          @nhurion You can give my Test 3 ISO a try. I have not updated it in a few months so it does need updates. Don't use the ALT kernel...

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Online
                            olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            I would recommend against going for a custom solution: you might have more issues than going to XCP-ng 8.3. Despite it's alpha, it's already very stable. And a first beta version is around the corner!

                            N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • N Offline
                              nhurion @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert

                              Well the 8.3 is installed now, so I will give it a try.

                              But are you telling me it is not possible to install the 8.2.1 with 226 drivers at all ?

                              Because then I don't get the backporting that this thread is referring to.
                              What is the point of backporting if it cannot be used ?

                              N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • N Offline
                                nhurion @nhurion
                                last edited by

                                @nhurion Trying to add the new host to existing pool, the host is not compatible.
                                Is it possible to downgrade 8.3 to 8.2.1 ?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Online
                                  olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  8.2 is an LTS, and it's not planned to make major modifications or use drivers that are a bit too recent for it. We strongly suggest, in your case with this kind of hardware, to stay on 8.3.

                                  Right now, I don't see any reason to go on 8.2 with non-server grade hardware anyway ๐Ÿ™‚

                                  N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • N Offline
                                    nhurion @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by

                                    @olivierlambert
                                    I understood what you said.
                                    Please understand that when people make a homelab itโ€™s essentially to learn.

                                    What Iโ€™ve learned is that when you need an extra driver to install xcp-ng, this case have been covered but:

                                    • the doc does not help
                                    • Google does not help
                                    • chatgpt does not help
                                    • YouTube does not help
                                    • xcp-ng forum does not help.

                                    Quite an unpleasant learning experience.

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                    • A Offline
                                      Andrew Top contributor @nhurion
                                      last edited by

                                      @nhurion Relax.... It's the weekend (US holiday too). You can give my test ISO a try. The new IGC driver is an update in the 8.2 repository.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • W Offline
                                        wilsonqanda
                                        last edited by wilsonqanda

                                        8.3 beta is definitely a huge improvement as in 8.2 LTS it didn't even detect the RTL card lol ๐Ÿ™‚
                                        Interesting it seem like some are getting the 1Gb/s for the RTL8125 (should be 2.5Gb/s) my for some reason is stuck at 100Mb/s

                                        Running on XCP-ng 8.3 beta

                                        Issue: running on 100Mb/s instead of 2.5Gb/s ๐Ÿ˜ž

                                        a91b53fa-16a0-4243-a8cb-563a097724a7-image.png

                                        533b88eb-67bb-47a4-9530-04d7a20e39e4-image.png

                                        lkernanL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • lkernanL Offline
                                          lkernan @wilsonqanda
                                          last edited by

                                          @wilsonqanda
                                          It's saying Link partner advertised link modes 10 and 100baseT. I'd check what the other end of the cable is plugged into.

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • W Offline
                                            wilsonqanda @lkernan
                                            last edited by wilsonqanda

                                            @lkernan Ahh ic let me double check. Thanks hopefully that is the case.

                                            Ok the linked partner was the issue. Thanks for clarifying that issue makes total sense now ๐Ÿ™‚

                                            W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • olivierlambertO olivierlambert moved this topic from News on
                                            • First post
                                              Last post