XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Issue after latest host update

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
    57 Posts 9 Posters 8.8k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RealTehrealR Offline
      RealTehreal @andyhhp
      last edited by

      @andyhhp said in Issue after latest host update:

      @RealTehreal Sorry to keep adding to the list of diagnostics, but everything here will help. After you've tried the other options, could you try this:

      If the XTF testing shows any XTF test looping, use that single test, otherwise use your regular VM. Get one VM into the looping state. Check xl list to confirm that you've only got Domain-0 and the one other VM, and note it's domid (the "ID" column).

      In dom0, run xentrace to capture a system trace. It's looping so the dump file is going to be large, but it also means that you can CTRL-C as quickly as you can on the shell and it will be fine (a few hundred milliseconds of samples will almost certainly be enough).

      Anyway, run xentrace -D -e 0x0008f000 xentrace.dmp and then give me created xentrace.dmp file. If you're interested in what's in it, you can decode it using xenalyze -a xentrace.dmp |& less.

      Then, run xen-hvmctx $domid two or three times, and share the output of all.

      I sent you a pm.

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        andyhhp Xen Guru @RealTehreal
        last edited by

        @RealTehreal Thank-you very much for that information. I'll follow up with Intel.

        In the short term, I'd recommend just using the old microcode.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          FYI I ordered and received a Mini PC based on a Celeron N4000 for internal testing (Gemini Lake "non-refresh"), and we were able to reproduce the issue 🙂

          So as @andyhhp said, now we are 100% sure it's the microcode, it's up to Intel, who is now aware of this!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • M Offline
            mr_zz @nikade
            last edited by

            This post is deleted!
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              mr_zz @nikade
              last edited by

              @nikade said in Issue after latest host update:

              @RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:

              @RealTehreal
              Step-by-step instructions, in case, someone else has the same issue:

              1.: yum history list to get the transaction id of the last update.

              2.: yum history info # with # being the id from step 1, to list the updates done in this transaction. The interesting part for me was

              Updated microcode_ctl-2:2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64  
              Update                2:2.1-26.xs28.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64
              

              3.:yum downgrade microcode_ctl-2:2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 to downgrade to the previous version. You will have to enter the older version for this command.

              4.: Wait until it's done, reboot, test, pray it'll work again.

              This is just a workaround! Microcode updates are important security and/or functional updates. Downgrading can lead to security issues.

              Thanks for sharing the resolution, im sure it will help someone else in the future.

              @nikade Here I am!
              Same problem (obviously) for Intel J4005 (I'm new to xcp-ng and I'm thinking about a homelab migration from Proxmox to an old NUC 7 as a test).
              So thank you all very much for clarifying me which of the 65 updates (from the initial downloaded image) was the problem that was driving me crazy in these days of testing!

              nikadeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • nikadeN Offline
                nikade Top contributor @mr_zz
                last edited by

                @mr_zz welcome to the forum 🙂

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  andyhhp Xen Guru @nikade
                  last edited by

                  @RealTehreal I've got a fix from Intel, and @stormi has packaged it.

                  yum update microcode_ctl --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing should get you microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs29.2.xcpng8.2 which has the fixed microcode for this issue in it.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • stormiS stormi referenced this topic on
                  • M Offline
                    mgigirey @andyhhp
                    last edited by

                    @andyhhp Any plans to update the intel-microcode for XCP-ng 8.3? latest know version working in my setup is intel-microcode-20231009-1.xcpng8.3.noarch.rpm

                    A stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      andyhhp Xen Guru @mgigirey
                      last edited by

                      @mgigirey said in Issue after latest host update:

                      @andyhhp Any plans to update the intel-microcode for XCP-ng 8.3? latest know version working in my setup is intel-microcode-20231009-1.xcpng8.3.noarch.rpm

                      I am not an XCP-ng developer. You'll have to ask @stormi for that.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @mgigirey
                        last edited by

                        @mgigirey Yes, soon.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          mgigirey @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi Thanks, looking forward.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post