XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Permissions Make No Sense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Management
    permissionsmatrixaclgroups
    16 Posts 5 Posters 784 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      DustinB @jimmymiller
      last edited by

      @jimmymiller said in Permissions Make No Sense:

      @DustinB
      Does the Self Service resource sets not cover your needs? I understand wanting to limit resources so they don't impact others, but pinning down to a specific host that may be a part of a larger pool can make ACLs ugly. Especially when you enable HA or Plans/DRS. If you aren't planning to enable those features, why not leave the host as an independent pool and give them access that way?

      No, SS doesn't address the ask.

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jimmymiller @DustinB
        last edited by

        @DustinB So what features about the pool are you wanting to use that you can't just give them access to the individual host (i.e. as a single host pool)?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Tristis OrisT Offline
          Tristis Oris Top contributor
          last edited by Tristis Oris

          I agree, got a similar dilemma now.
          Required to grant permissions to single host (gpu computing) and ability to create\remove VMs.

          But it looks it no ACL for VM creation, it available only for global admin\pool admin accounts. So only way is setup standalone XO for each single host? This way i lose the pool storage and VM migration.

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • D Offline
            DustinB @Tristis Oris
            last edited by

            @Tristis-Oris said in Permissions Make No Sense:

            I agree, got a similar dilemma now.
            Required to grant permissions to single host (gpu computing) and ability to create\remove VMs.

            But it looks it no ACL for VM creation, it available only for global admin\pool admin accounts. So only way is setup standalone XO for each single host? This way i lose the pool storage and VM migration.

            I'm glad someone else came across the same issue I was encountering (still don't have a solution) but maybe the vates team is working on it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Online
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              If you want to get more than permission on existing objects, you need to use the self service, it's made exactly for that.

              Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tristis OrisT Offline
                Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                last edited by Tristis Oris

                @olivierlambert but, what is this?) i see nothing at docs.
                ah. this self service, not a build-in acl group.

                That mean i need to create some VM templates and share them to user, but even devs don't know what they will need.
                This more a bout resource limitation, which is not my task. Or i'm wrong?

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D Offline
                  DustinB @Tristis Oris
                  last edited by

                  @Tristis-Oris you can read up on it here, https://xen-orchestra.com/docs/users.html#self-service-portal

                  While Self-Service might "scratch the itch" I've been able to talk my team off the edge and just let me manage the environment and grant them access to the VM's through other means.

                  Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Tristis OrisT Offline
                    Tristis Oris Top contributor @DustinB
                    last edited by

                    @DustinB yeah i already remember about that button. Still not sure is it suitiable for me. Need to check it again.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Tristis OrisT Offline
                      Tristis Oris Top contributor
                      last edited by

                      yes, it almost what i need, really great. But you can't setup host affinity via self-service VM creation. Since i have different GPU on hosts, some persons required only 1 host from the whole pool.

                      self
                      e6af7800-6ecc-4ece-9b4f-b17965b02ef4-image.png

                      basic admin
                      0a86dffb-6419-4d13-95b6-1215d5ad977e-image.png

                      Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Tristis OrisT Offline
                        Tristis Oris Top contributor @Tristis Oris
                        last edited by

                        you can't configure vGPU limitation at self-service rule, but user can select vGPU at VM creation based on that rule. So it would be unlimited. But i can't really check it with my nvidia cards.

                        and what is Share this VM?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post