XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
      last edited by stormi

      @Tristis-Oris indeed, I can confirm. I'm not sure about the config file because it's the same version of mc as we have on 8.2.1, where it's working.

      Maybe it needs a rebuild.

      G N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        Greg_E @stormi
        last edited by Greg_E

        @stormi

        I noticed an error message while performing this upgrade... Says we should be using UEFI from this point forward. I didn't see that in the release notes, or didn't really read that part very well. It lets you go forward but mentions that higher revisions will not be able to work in BIOS mode.

        Here's a question that probably doesn't need to be worked out yet:

        If we have old BIOS boot for 8.2.x, and we go to upgrade to 8.x.x (next LTS), are we going to be able to switch to shutdown, switch to UEFI, boot the installer, and upgrade? Or is this going to need a clean install?

        uefi_warning.png

        J stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          john.c @Greg_E
          last edited by john.c

          @Greg_E said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

          @stormi

          I noticed an error message while performing this upgrade... Says we should be using UEFI from this point forward. I didn't see that in the release notes, or didn't really read that part very well. It lets you go forward but mentions that higher revisions will not be able to work in BIOS mode.

          Here's a question that probably doesn't need to be worked out yet:

          If we have old BIOS boot for 8.2.x, and we go to upgrade to 8.x.x (next LTS), are we going to be able to switch to shutdown, switch to UEFI, boot the installer, and upgrade? Or is this going to need a clean install?

          uefi_warning.png

          The release of 8.3 is the last version in the 8.x version series. Also 8.3 is a special release at the moment its a standard release, then at a later date its going to become the LTS (next one from after 8.2).

          The next version number after 8.3 is going to be 9.0 (https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2024/10/07/xcp-ng-8-3/ and https://docs.xcp-ng.org/releases/release-8-3/).

          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            Greg_E @john.c
            last edited by

            @john-c
            The UEFI only is going to cut off a bunch of older lab hardware, my HP DL360 gen 8 do not (can not?) have UEFI. That also means that Supermicro X9 is probably out, not sure about old Dell.

            It's progress and as such need to move with the times, but Beta 9 is going to be a long way off for my testing it due to hardware limitations.

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              john.c @Greg_E
              last edited by john.c

              @Greg_E said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

              @john-c
              The UEFI only is going to cut off a bunch of older lab hardware, my HP DL360 gen 8 do not (can not?) have UEFI. That also means that Supermicro X9 is probably out, not sure about old Dell.

              It's progress and as such need to move with the times, but Beta 9 is going to be a long way off for my testing it due to hardware limitations.

              If your old Dell machines are from PowerEdge Gen 12 or later then they can use EFI (UEFI) just need to enable it in the BIOS of those servers.

              May also be possible with your Supermicro X9, though a link to the model or the datasheet would help please?

              The HPE DL360 Gen8 is likely definitely out unless it has a EFI option via an update. Though for sure the use of HPE DL360 Gen9 or higher will work.

              A G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tristis OrisT
                Tristis Oris Top contributor
                last edited by

                weird that i got warning even with UEFI enabled.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Greg_E
                  last edited by

                  @Greg_E All answers are actually in the release notes: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/releases/release-8-3/#legacy-bios

                  The deprecation decision comes from XenServer. Whether we'll follow the same schedule as them is yet to be decided, also depending on when they remove its support completely.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    Andrew Top contributor @john.c
                    last edited by

                    @john-c No UEFI on HP DL Gen8.... it too bad because they work just fine. HP DL Gen9 servers support UEFI boot. By the time XCP 9.x rolls around it will be time to trash the G8 machines anyway. But lack of BIOS boot will limit cheap lab/home machines...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      Greg_E @john.c
                      last edited by

                      @john-c

                      HP says Gen9 has UEFI, and probably those are now in the $200 shipped range with 40 threads and 128gb of RAM like the gen8 were when I bought them.

                      I'll have to upgrade at some point, probably going to be a mini system next time.

                      As an FYI, I think Vsphere8 products require UEFI, I saw a notice in the instructions about this, haven't installed yet. Yes testing the competition and mostly for experience migrating off of VMware.

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        john.c @Greg_E
                        last edited by john.c

                        @Greg_E said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                        @john-c

                        HP says Gen9 has UEFI, and probably those are now in the $200 shipped range with 40 threads and 128gb of RAM like the gen8 were when I bought them.

                        I'll have to upgrade at some point, probably going to be a mini system next time.

                        As an FYI, I think Vsphere8 products require UEFI, I saw a notice in the instructions about this, haven't installed yet. Yes testing the competition and mostly for experience migrating off of VMware.

                        Bargain Hardware carries a HPE DL360 Gen9 for only £80, a HPE DL380 Gen9 for £80 and a HPE DL560 Gen9 for £237. Check them out! https://www.bargainhardware.co.uk

                        I used them for my Home Lab's Dell PowerEdge servers, they are really good. I haven't had problems with them or their products if I do they are very good at helping out. Also are a good source for access to components and upgrades which are hard to get!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          nomad @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @Greg_E I saw a similar thing and dealt with it thusly:

                          Upgrade the master in BIOS to preserve the configuration
                          Upgrade second (only other, in this case) host in the pool using UEFI boot
                          Migrate 'master' status to the second host
                          re-install the first host with UEFI, re-join it to the pool.

                          Before doing this take careful note of the xe pool-enable-tls-verification mentioned in the release notes. You won't be able to join the cleanly reinstalled host without it.

                          Typing 'master' so many times has me wishing we had a better word for the pool coordinator.

                          G N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            Greg_E @nomad
                            last edited by

                            @nomad

                            Thanks. I will eventually need to do this on my production system, thankfully it is new hardware and should be good until I retire (next guy's problem).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Tristis OrisT
                              Tristis Oris Top contributor
                              last edited by Tristis Oris

                              not sure is it XO or Xen issue.
                              8.3 release. i changed pool master and now it unavailable.

                              master
                              befc6f89-ffc1-4328-baa5-53b4f38b5bf3-image.png

                              hosts
                              f4edd025-e5f4-4e66-9fc4-6098eff0da0c-image.png

                              Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/5cceb02b-bda5-85d1-10c1-b5dfe4fbf66a/sr
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] Setting LVM_DEVICE to /dev/disk/by-scsid/36e43ec6100f01acf292713f000000006
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/845ef0aa-7561-9253-b9fa-0b862c145c54/sr
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] LVMCache created for VG_XenStorage-845ef0aa-7561-9253-b9fa-0b862c145c54
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph fairlock[3895]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper acquired
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph fairlock[3895]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper sent '420301 - 77059.294148651hz#006��^?'
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] ['/sbin/vgs', '--readonly', 'VG_XenStorage-845ef0aa-7561-9253-b9fa-0b862c145c54']
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301]   pread SUCCESS
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph fairlock[3895]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper released
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] Entering _checkMetadataVolume
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] LVMCache: will initialize now
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] LVMCache: refreshing
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph fairlock[3895]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper acquired
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph fairlock[3895]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper sent '420301 - 77059.464449994hz#006��^?'
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] ['/sbin/lvs', '--noheadings', '--units', 'b', '-o', '+lv_tags', '/dev/VG_XenStorage-845ef0aa-7561-9253-b9fa-0b862c145c54']
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301]   pread SUCCESS
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph fairlock[3895]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper released
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] Targets 1 and iscsi_sessions 1
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/5cceb02b-bda5-85d1-10c1-b5dfe4fbf66a/sr
Oct 11 12:12:00 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [420301] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/845ef0aa-7561-9253-b9fa-0b862c145c54/sr
Oct 11 12:22:19 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [423642] Raising exception [150, Failed to initialize XMLRPC connection]
Oct 11 12:22:19 rpsrv-cas-caph SM: [423642] Unable to open local XAPI session
                              stormiS yannY 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
                                last edited by

                                @Tristis-Oris

                                1. Is that on the released version of XCP-ng 8.3?
                                2. What steps did you follow to change the pool master and why? Was it in the middle of the pool upgrade?
                                3. check xensource.log around the time of the XAPI startup.
                                Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Tristis OrisT
                                  Tristis Oris Top contributor @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi

                                  1. release version.
                                  2. fresh pool installation. no tasks, just master change via XO.
                                  $
Oct 11 13:26:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC live_words = 1213142
Oct 11 13:26:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC heap_words = 1772032
Oct 11 13:26:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC free_words = 558699
Oct 11 13:29:38 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|stunnel] client cert verification 172.29.1.153:443: SNI=pool path=/etc/stun$
Oct 11 13:29:38 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] stunnel: stunnel start\x0A
Oct 11 13:29:38 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|stunnel] Started a client (pid:45316): -> 172.29.1.153:443
Oct 11 13:29:38 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [ info||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] stunnel disconnected fd_closed=true proc_quit=false
Oct 11 13:29:38 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [error||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] Caught Xapi_database.Master_connection.Goto_handler
Oct 11 13:29:38 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] Sleeping 256.000000 seconds before retrying master conne$
Oct 11 13:29:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC live_words = 854843
Oct 11 13:29:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC heap_words = 880128
Oct 11 13:29:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC free_words = 25284
Oct 11 13:32:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC live_words = 1571266
Oct 11 13:32:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC heap_words = 1772032
Oct 11 13:32:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC free_words = 200761
Oct 11 13:33:54 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|stunnel] client cert verification 172.29.1.153:443: SNI=pool path=/etc/stun$
Oct 11 13:33:54 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] stunnel: stunnel start\x0A
Oct 11 13:33:54 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|stunnel] Started a client (pid:46379): -> 172.29.1.153:443
Oct 11 13:33:54 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [ info||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] stunnel disconnected fd_closed=true proc_quit=false
Oct 11 13:33:54 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [error||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] Caught Xapi_database.Master_connection.Goto_handler
Oct 11 13:33:54 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] Sleeping 256.000000 seconds before retrying master conne$
Oct 11 13:35:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC live_words = 935099
Oct 11 13:35:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC heap_words = 1012224
Oct 11 13:35:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC free_words = 77123
Oct 11 13:38:10 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|stunnel] client cert verification 172.29.1.153:443: SNI=pool path=/etc/stun$
Oct 11 13:38:10 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] stunnel: stunnel start\x0A
Oct 11 13:38:10 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|stunnel] Started a client (pid:47395): -> 172.29.1.153:443
Oct 11 13:38:10 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [ info||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] stunnel disconnected fd_closed=true proc_quit=false
Oct 11 13:38:10 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [error||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] Caught Xapi_database.Master_connection.Goto_handler
Oct 11 13:38:10 rpsrv-cas-navi xapi: [debug||0 |bringing up management interface D:56aeb415b10f|master_connection] Sleeping 256.000000 seconds before retrying master conne$
Oct 11 13:38:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC live_words = 1213031
Oct 11 13:38:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC heap_words = 1772032
Oct 11 13:38:52 rpsrv-cas-navi xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC free_words = 558790
                                  Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Tristis OrisT
                                    Tristis Oris Top contributor @Tristis Oris
                                    last edited by Tristis Oris

                                    @Tristis-Oris i tried to remove host from pool or change master, but can't execute even xe host-list with endless timeout

                                    done with

                                    xe pool-emergency-transition-to-master
xe pool-recover-slaves

                                    all vms at dead master counts as running, so i can't run them again.

                                    and can't forget host "code": "HOST_HAS_RESIDENT_VMS",

                                    upd
                                    need to reset vms with
                                    xe vm-reset-powerstate uuid=*** --force then forget host.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • yannY
                                      yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
                                      last edited by

                                      @Tristis-Oris is the xapi daemon still running? daemon.log and xensource.log around the time you changed the master could give more insight?

                                      Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Tristis OrisT
                                        Tristis Oris Top contributor @yann
                                        last edited by

                                        @yann

                                        Oct 11 16:05:51 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:05:55 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:05:55 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:05:59 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:05:59 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:06:03 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:06:03 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:06:07 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:06:07 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:06:11 rpsrv-cas-caph systemd[1]: Created slice User Slice of root.
Oct 11 16:06:11 rpsrv-cas-caph systemd[1]: Starting User Slice of root.
Oct 11 16:06:11 rpsrv-cas-caph systemd[1]: Started Session c9 of user root.
Oct 11 16:06:11 rpsrv-cas-caph systemd[1]: Starting Session c9 of user root.
Oct 11 16:06:11 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:06:11 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:06:15 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:06:15 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$
Oct 11 16:06:19 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: Caught: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", "")
Oct 11 16:06:19 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi-nbd[16958]: main: Failed to log in via xapi's Unix domain socket: Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ECONNREFUSED, "connect", ""); retrying in 4.0000$

                                        Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 14/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasi$
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 15/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasi$
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 16/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 67
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 17/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 94
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 18/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasi$
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 19/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasi$
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace] 20/20 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/log/debug.ml, line 250
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|backtrace]
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [ warn||0 |server_init D:b092c49f7d0d|startup] task [Synchronising host configuration files] exception: Pool_role.This_host_is_broken
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] server_init D:b092c49f7d0d failed with exception Pool_role.This_host_is_broken
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] Raised Pool_role.This_host_is_broken
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 1/15 xapi Raised at file ocaml/libs/log/debug.ml, line 267
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 2/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 3/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 4/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 186
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 5/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/startup.ml, line 95
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 6/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/startup.ml, line 103
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 7/15 xapi Called from file list.ml, line 110
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 8/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 9/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 10/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/xapi.ml, line 1081
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 11/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 67
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 12/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 94
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 13/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 14/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 15/15 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/log/debug.ml, line 250
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace]
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [debug||0 ||xapi] xapi top-level caught exception: INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Pool_role.This_host_is_broken ]
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] Raised Pool_role.This_host_is_broken
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace] 1/1 xapi Raised at file (Thread 0 has no backtrace table. Was with_backtraces called?, line 0
Oct 11 16:02:49 rpsrv-cas-caph xapi: [error||0 ||backtrace]
Oct 11 16:04:12 rpsrv-cas-caph xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC live_words = 743602
Oct 11 16:04:12 rpsrv-cas-caph xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC heap_words = 1795584
Oct 11 16:04:12 rpsrv-cas-caph xcp-rrdd: [ info||7 ||rrdd_main] GC free_words = 1051903
                                        yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Tristis OrisT
                                          Tristis Oris Top contributor
                                          last edited by

                                          also with two 8.3 pools, i have tons of logs everywhere.
                                          that for last 1 hour.

                                          98070b0a-93ce-47a4-8e58-7355231dd8e3-image.png

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • yannY
                                            yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
                                            last edited by

                                            @Tristis-Oris Pool_role.This_host_is_broken is a bit scary, and more logs will be needed to understand how it got there. I'm trying to follow the same procedure as you to request the right lines - how exactly did you perform the master change?

                                            Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post