XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tristis OrisT Offline
      Tristis Oris Top contributor @Tristis Oris
      last edited by

      @Tristis-Oris after i fixed all dom0 stuck VDIs, backup succeed once and now stuck again.

      yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • yannY Offline
        yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
        last edited by

        @Tristis-Oris very strange, your log seems to show that 2 designate_new_master requests were handled one after the other (at 12:11:33 and 12:12:45), both to switch to the same host - and we see in the logs that while the 1st one got all phases executed (1, 2.1, 2.2), the second one starts to have issues during "Phase 2.1: telling everyone but me to commit". Sending a second request should indeed not trigger the whole thing again, so something apparently went quite wrong, but what is indeed not obvious.

        Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Tristis OrisT Offline
          Tristis Oris Top contributor @yann
          last edited by

          @yann so, i don't get indication about running master change and was able to run it again.

          yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • yannY Offline
            yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
            last edited by

            @Tristis-Oris Oh OK. Had a try to run it several times myself (though on a 2-host pool), and I was able to see the operation performed twice, though apparently the second op did finish.
            Running from the shell, if launch a second xe pool-designate-new-master while the first has not returned yet, it gets a DESIGNATE_NEW_MASTER_IN_PROGRESS error, but once it has returned there seem to be a window to do strange things.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • yannY Offline
              yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
              last edited by

              @Tristis-Oris and with a 3-host pool I can reproduce you issue on 2nd attempt: new master loses its xapi process

              When the master is changed, the xapi service is stopped and then restarted but something seems to get wrong this time.

              Among issues I realize that my former-master shows this at the time of the failing switch:

              Oct 14 15:20:50 xcpng83-bzkcpvhy xsh: [ warn||0 ||xsh] TLS verification is disabled on this host: /var/xapi/verify-certificates is absent
              

              (while both other hosts do have that file)

              daemon.log on new-master shows systemd desperately trying to restart xapi:

              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv xapi-init[1244028]: Stopping xapi: [  OK  ]
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: Unit xapi.service entered failed state.
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: xapi.service failed.
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: xapi.service holdoff time over, scheduling restart.
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit lvm2-activation.service, ignoring: Unit is masked.
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit lvm2-activation-early.service, ignoring: Unit is masked.
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: Starting XenAPI server (XAPI)...
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: Started XenAPI server (XAPI).
              Oct 14 15:20:59 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv xapi-init[1244047]: Starting xapi:
              Oct 14 15:21:00 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv systemd[1]: xapi.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=2/INVALIDARGUMENT
              Oct 14 15:21:00 xcp-ng-hqerhcgv xapi-init[1244078]: Stopping xapi: [  OK  ]
              

              and xensource.log is very similar to yours. Congrats, that's a nice bug πŸ™‚

              Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Tristis OrisT Offline
                Tristis Oris Top contributor @yann
                last edited by

                @yann yay! πŸ˜ƒ

                yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  Strebor
                  last edited by

                  Just a note to say thanks to all involved! Excellent job!

                  I yesterday upgraded our 8.3 release pool to 8.3 production. 2x Intel NUC11TNKi5. Running very nicely! The upgrade from release candidate with the ISO written to USB media went smoothly. Also the yum updates after the upgrade.

                  Now looking forward to see XO Lite be completed!
                  Keep up the great work!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • yannY Offline
                    yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
                    last edited by

                    @Tristis-Oris I also reproduced the issue on 8.2.1, and record the issue. As for your pool left in a tricky state, would it be reasonable for you to reinstall the impacted hosts?

                    Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Tristis OrisT Offline
                      Tristis Oris Top contributor @yann
                      last edited by

                      @yann yep, already reinstall it.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G Offline
                        gb.123
                        last edited by

                        Installed in my Homelab. Install went smoothly.

                        Small bugs I have noticed :
                        1.
                        XCP-NG Install Error.jpg

                        This ONLY happens when using KVM and 'scaling' the display to fit window.

                        XCP-NG Update Error.jpg

                        This happens ONLY on the first boot after applying patch ( 6 programs ) once release iso is installed.
                        This goes away from the second boot.


                        Everything seems to be working smoothly for now. Kudos to the Vates Team !

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • G Offline
                          gb.123
                          last edited by gb.123

                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by

                            Regarding xsconsole, I think it always had this issue where at some point it thinks (rightfully or not) that the screen is too small for it to run.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Tristis OrisT Offline
                              Tristis Oris Top contributor
                              last edited by

                              Already every VM at 8.3 pool stuck at control domain. Can't detach them without pool reboot. Any workaround?
                              2f0b2aae-92d5-4e86-a277-19f6a9643947-image.png

                              vbd.delete
                              {
                                "id": "7af4b39d-d6aa-2589-509f-f082a1f0f2bb
                              
                              "
                              }
                              {
                                "code": "OPERATION_NOT_ALLOWED",
                                "params": [
                                  "VBD '7af4b39d-d6aa-2589-509f-f082a1f0f2bb
                              
                              ' still attached to 'e9e4e600-b180-481d-9a1b-a45be8fc192e
                              
                              '"
                                ],
                                "call": {
                                  "method": "VBD.destroy",
                                  "params": [
                                    "OpaqueRef:65481d14-d3de-82d7-fa7d-95131f14a209
                              
                              "
                                  ]
                                },
                                "message": "OPERATION_NOT_ALLOWED(VBD '7af4b39d-d6aa-2589-509f-f082a1f0f2bb
                              
                              ' still attached to 'e9e4e600-b180-481d-9a1b-a45be8fc192e
                              
                              ')",
                                "name": "XapiError",
                                "stack": "XapiError: OPERATION_NOT_ALLOWED(VBD '7af4b39d-d6aa-2589-509f-f082a1f0f2bb
                              
                              ' still attached to 'e9e4e600-b180-481d-9a1b-a45be8fc192e
                              
                              ')
                                  at Function.wrap (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202410181215/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)
                                  at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202410181215/packages/xen-api/transports/json-rpc.mjs:38:21
                                  at runNextTicks (node:internal/process/task_queues:60:5)
                                  at processImmediate (node:internal/timers:454:9)
                                  at process.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:130:17)"
                              }
                              
                              A MathieuM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                Ajmind 0 @Tristis Oris
                                last edited by

                                I have tried to install an old Intel Server (SR2625/S5520UR / Dual Xeon E5645) running XCP-NG XCP-NG 8.3 beta with 8.3 release ISO:

                                The Server was first running XCP-NG 8.2.1 and was upgraded with 8.3 beta 2 ISO.

                                I could run the installation proccess until

                                completing installation 50%
                                

                                And nothing happens further:
                                PXL_20241021_125706035.MP (Groß).jpg
                                PXL_20241021_125914275.jpg

                                Install media was freshly created and booted in EFI mode.
                                Any idea how to finish this process?

                                FinallfF yannY 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • FinallfF Offline
                                  Finallf @Ajmind 0
                                  last edited by

                                  @Ajmind-0
                                  try running the installation in safe option.

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jhansenJ Offline
                                    jhansen
                                    last edited by

                                    Version XCP-NG 8.3 RC
                                    XO lastest version

                                    Hello,
                                    I use XO with Delta Backup to back up my VM's. I have activated NBD and CBT in the backup. The backups run via the management interface with NBD activated.
                                    The first full backup runs error-free.
                                    The second backup with delta gives me the error message cleanVm: incorrect backup size in metadata and VDI_IN_USE and the backup ends with an error.
                                    After the delta backup, I then have snapshots on the storage that are blocked with "Control domain on host xxx". I can then no longer delete these. The only option is to reboot all Xen servers in the pool, after which the snapshots are still there, but can then be disconnected and forget to get them deleted.
                                    I was able to reproduce this error on different pools with different servers, all 8.3. It is always different VMs that trigger the error and others that are backed up without errors.
                                    If I delete all control domain blocked snapshots and also the purged snapshot from the storage, the next full backup runs error-free again.
                                    Does anyone have the same problem and maybe a solution?
                                    regards Joerg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jhansenJ Offline
                                      jhansen
                                      last edited by

                                      I saw that Tristis Oris seems to have a similar problem with snapshots.

                                      Something else, when updating from 8.2.1 to 8.3 RC.
                                      My 8.2.1 servers were still running on BIOS boot. When updating to 8.3 RC I got the message that there was still a DOS table on the hard drive and the update from the USB stick was aborted.
                                      A newly installed 8.3 server with UEFI cannot be integrated into the old 8.2 pool.

                                      Here is a small workaround:
                                      2 USB sticks, one with 8.2.1 and one with 8.3 RC.
                                      Take one server out of the pool, not the master.
                                      Reinstall with UEFI on 8.2.1.
                                      Integrate server into the old pool.
                                      make server as new pool master.
                                      The server can now be updated to 8.3 without any problems, the master is on UEFI and all pool information and VM are on 8.3.
                                      Now just take all other servers out of the pool, do a clean 8.3 UEFI installation and put them back into the pool.

                                      Maybe that will help others with the same problem.

                                      regards Joerg

                                      stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • MathieuM Offline
                                        Mathieu @Tristis Oris
                                        last edited by

                                        @Tristis-Oris
                                        It seems that since updating to 8.3, I also have VDI attached to control domain I cannot delete, they appear after a backup.
                                        The only solution to forget them is to a pool reboot.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @jhansen
                                          last edited by

                                          @jhansen said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                          Something else, when updating from 8.2.1 to 8.3 RC.

                                          Are you updating to 8.3 RC when the official 8.3.0 is now released?

                                          jhansenJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                            last edited by

                                            Given the diversity of issues reported above, and the fact that XCP-ng 8.3 is now released, I strongly suggest you all create new topics in the forum. You can reference them once in this thread to help them get attention, no problem with that.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post