XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    New Rust Xen guest tools

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    152 Posts 38 Posters 85.7k Views 35 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • yannY Offline
      yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @dClauzel
      last edited by

      @dClauzel since Debian has switched away from sysvinit we did not take the time to provide an init.d script, but if there is a need, we can include one. Feel free to open an issue (or, even better, a merge request 😉) on the project in Gitlab!

      Thanks for your feedback!

      dClauzelD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • dClauzelD Offline
        dClauzel @yann
        last edited by

        @yann Thanks for the fast reply ❤

        Ok, I am opening a ticket, and providing a simple support script.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • D Offline
          David_5.1
          last edited by David_5.1

          Hello,

          I have a setup with routers (running Debian Bookworm) that need more interfaces than the maximum allowed number of vifs so the VM has one vif and VLAN untagging is done inside it.
          As no IPs were detected by the traditional xen tools, I switched to the new, Rust ones, but they fail to detect IPs too 😕

          I think it is caused by the lack of /sys/class/net/enX0.*/device/devtype files, despite a few enX0.* interfaces (and folders) and /sys/class/net/enX0/device/devtype (containing vif, as expected) exist.

          Should I create an issue directly in the Gitlab project, or comment the partially-related one for SR-IOV support?

          yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • yannY Offline
            yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @David_5.1
            last edited by

            @David_5.1 a new issue would be better. Thanks fo your feedback!

            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              David_5.1 @yann
              last edited by

              @yann here you are : https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-guest-agent/-/issues/22

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • D Offline
                Dillweed @yann
                last edited by

                @kevdog @yann said in New Rust Xen guest tools:

                @kevdog great news, looking forward for this PKGBUILD!
                Wouldn't it make sense to build from release packages rather than from Git?

                The CI scripts should give you some guidance. For dependencies you should have a list at https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-guest-agent#build-requirements. Not sure why you would want python-setuptools?

                Hey all, I put together PKGBUILD for Arch which pulls the latest git. It seems to be working fine for me. You'll need to install xen package on AUR.
                https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xen-guest-agent-git

                It's my first attempt at submitting something on AUR. I look forward to any feedback.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • A Online
                  Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert No IP record... Using Debian 11 with Management agent 1.0.0-proto-0.4.0. It's a non-standard interface setup with the IPv4/IPv6 assigned to the bridge interface. The agent does not report any addresses up to XO.

                  1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
                      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
                      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
                         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
                      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
                         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
                  2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master br0 state UP group default qlen 1000
                      link/ether 32:a9:24:28:18:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
                  3: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
                      link/ether 52:31:46:59:66:a1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
                      inet 192.168.1.33/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global br0
                         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
                      inet6 2000::5031:46ff:fe59:66a1/64 scope global dynamic mngtmpaddr
                         valid_lft 2591833sec preferred_lft 604633sec
                      inet6 fe80::5031:46ff:fe59:66a1/64 scope link
                         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Likely because br0 isn't parsed. Pinging @yann and @TeddyAstie

                    yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • yannY Offline
                      yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
                      last edited by yann

                      @olivierlambert yes, and that's a known issue. The protocol used to communicate with XAPI only allows to report info for VIFs (and SR/IOV, with support coming with in a PR). We can likely implement something by querying the status of bridge devices and listening to their changes like we do for the VIFs, and report those for the VIFs that are part of bridges - but it's a bit more than just "parsing br0" 😉 .

                      Opened https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-guest-agent/-/issues/24

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F Offline
                        flakpyro @yann
                        last edited by flakpyro

                        With the release of Debian 13 apt now complains that the repo is not signed. Also Debain has changed to using .sources files for repos.

                        For example,, the new format would be:

                        Types: deb
                        URIs: https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project%2Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64/
                        Suites: release/
                        Components: 
                        Signed-By: https://path/to/release.gpg
                        Trusted: yes
                        
                        

                        Maybe worth addding a release.gpg to the repo and updating documentation when configuring the repo on newer Debian / Ubuntu releases?

                        Example of the error when no key is present:

                        Ign:8 https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project%2Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64 release/ InRelease
                        Hit:9 https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project%2Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64 release/ Release
                        Ign:10 https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project%2Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64 release/ Release.gpg
                        Fetched 176 kB in 1s (154 kB/s)
                        All packages are up to date.    
                        Notice: Missing Signed-By in the sources.list(5) entry for 'https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project%2Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64'
                        
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          @yann can you update the README accordingly?

                          yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • yannY Offline
                            yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            @olivierlambert updating the README will be quick enough... but if the sig is indeed mandatory we need to setup something for this first... and autosigning from a CI rather requires doing that on a trusted runner rather than on gitlab-provided ones, so that requires some provisioning and IT work first.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post