XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Continuous Replication jobs creates full backups every time since 2025-09-06 (xo from source)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    31 Posts 5 Posters 1.5k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      peo @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert said in Continuous Replication jobs creates full backups every time since 2025-09-06 (xo from source):

      No, no confirmation so far, that's why we need more to investigate πŸ™‚

      Great (or maybe not) news.. At least on my system this is very easy to replicate.. On a tiny test machine that only have had a normal backup before, first time doing replication copy (to H2 SSD) it sends it as full as expected. Just did some simple operations on the machine (like apt update, no upgrade), then retried:
      96206924-73a5-484d-b089-ad9c673b4670-image.png

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        peo @peo
        last edited by

        Too bad it becomes that unexplainable slow when it has to fall back to a full backup:
        f971760e-3157-4352-a2e8-c0060aada73a-image.png

        The first (full) backup was 10x faster:
        19a77237-047f-4813-b72b-9c9b3459e888-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
          last edited by

          @olivierlambert This happens to me too with a459015ca91c159123bb682f16237b4371a312a6.

          I did open an issue https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/8969

          andrew64k created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

          open a459015 causes delta replication to always be full #8969

          olivierlambertO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO @Andrew
            last edited by

            @Andrew And it doesn't with the commit just before?

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert Correct. Running commit 4944ea902ff19f172b1b86ec96ad989e322bec2c works.

              florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                @florent so it's like https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/a459015ca91c159123bb682f16237b4371a312a6 might introduced a regression?

                0 fbeauchamp committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra
                Fix(replication): VDI_NOT_MANAGED error  (#8935)
                
                from ticket #40151
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • florentF Offline
                  florent Vates πŸͺ XO Team @Andrew
                  last edited by

                  @Andrew then again, with such a precise report, the fix is easier

                  the fix should join master soon

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by olivierlambert

                    If you want to test, you can switch to the relevant branch, which is fix_replication

                    https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/8971

                    fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                    closed fix(backups): replication doing always a full #8971

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert fix_replication works for some... but most of my VMs now have an error:
                      the writer IncrementalXapiWriter has failed the step writer.checkBaseVdis() with error Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'managed').

                            "result": {
                              "message": "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'managed')",
                              "name": "TypeError",
                              "stack": "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'managed')\n    at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalXapiWriter.mjs:29:15\n    at Array.filter (<anonymous>)\n    at IncrementalXapiWriter.checkBaseVdis (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalXapiWriter.mjs:26:8)\n    at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/IncrementalXapi.mjs:159:54\n    at callWriter (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_Abstract.mjs:33:15)\n    at IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner._callWriters (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_Abstract.mjs:52:14)\n    at IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner._selectBaseVm (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/IncrementalXapi.mjs:158:16)\n    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n    at async IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner.run (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_AbstractXapi.mjs:378:5)\n    at async file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/VmsXapi.mjs:166:38"
                            }
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Feedback for you @florent πŸ˜›

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J Offline
                          JB @peo
                          last edited by

                          @peo Yes, same problem!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            @olivierlambert @florent Looks like 1471ab0c7c79fa6dca9a1598e7be2a141753ba91 (in current master) has fixed the issue.

                            But, during testing I found a new related issue (no error messages). Running current XO master b16d5...

                            During the normal CR delta backup job, two VMs shows the warning message: Backup fell back to a full but it did a delta (not full) backup.

                            I caused this by running a different CR backup job (for testing) that used the two same VMs but to a different SR. The new test job did a full backup and delta backup correctly. Since there is only one CBT snapshot the normal backup job did recognize that the snapshot was not for the original normal backup job and should have done a full (and started a new CBT snapshot), but it only did a short delta.

                            As the VMs were off, I guess it could correctly use the other CBT snapshot as no blocks had changed... Just odd that CR backup said it was going to do a full and then did a delta.

                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • J Offline
                              JB @Andrew
                              last edited by

                              @Andrew backup-vms.jpeg

                              florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • florentF Offline
                                florent Vates πŸͺ XO Team @JB
                                last edited by

                                @JB this means that it should have done a delta ( as per the full backup interval ) , but had to fall back to a full for at least one disk
                                this can happens after a failed transfer, a new disk added and some edge case. This issue was not really visible before the latest release, even if the impacts can be important , saturating network and storage.

                                We are investigating this ( especially @Bastien-Nollet ) , and expect to have a fix and/or an explanation fast

                                Are you using "purge snapshot data" option ? Are there anything on the journalctl logs ?

                                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J Offline
                                  JB @florent
                                  last edited by

                                  @florent Thanks, Florent! No, No!

                                  florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • florentF Offline
                                    florent Vates πŸͺ XO Team @JB
                                    last edited by

                                    @JB Doyou have anything related in journalctl ? like can't connect through NBD, fall back to stream export or can't compute delta ${vdiRef} from ${baseRef}, fallBack to a full or anything starting by 'xo:xapi:xapi-disks'

                                    A J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      Andrew Top contributor @florent
                                      last edited by

                                      @florent

                                      Sep 15 10:00:01 xo1 xo-server[5582]: 2025-09-15T14:00:01.026Z xo:backups:worker INFO starting backup
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]: 2025-09-15T14:00:32.794Z xo:xapi:xapi-disks INFO Error in openNbdCBT XapiError: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_460(, Failed to calculate changed blocks for given VD
                                      Is. [opterr=Source and target VDI are unrelated], )
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at XapiError.wrap (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at default (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/packages/xen-api/_getTaskResult.mjs:13:29)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at Xapi._addRecordToCache (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1073:24)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1107:14
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at Xapi._processEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1097:12)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at Xapi._watchEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1270:14)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5) {
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   code: 'SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_460',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   params: [
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     '',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     'Failed to calculate changed blocks for given VDIs. [opterr=Source and target VDI are unrelated]',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     ''
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   ],
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   call: undefined,
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   url: undefined,
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   task: task {
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     uuid: '6265a41c-29c3-f4d9-5f0c-e52db6e0fcc9',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     name_label: 'Async.VDI.list_changed_blocks',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     name_description: '',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     allowed_operations: [],
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     current_operations: {},
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     created: '20250915T14:00:32Z',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     finished: '20250915T14:00:32Z',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     status: 'failure',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     resident_on: 'OpaqueRef:65b7a047-094b-4c7a-a503-2823e92b9fe4',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     progress: 1,
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     type: '<none/>',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     result: '',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     error_info: [
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       'SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_460',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       '',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       'Failed to calculate changed blocks for given VDIs. [opterr=Source and target VDI are unrelated]',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       ''
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     ],
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     other_config: {},
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     subtask_of: 'OpaqueRef:NULL',
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     subtasks: [],
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     backtrace: '(((process xapi)(filename lib/backtrace.ml)(line 210))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/storage_utils.ml)(line 141))((process xapi)(fi
                                      lename ocaml/xapi/message_forwarding.ml)(line 141))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 24))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/x
                                      api-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 39))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/rbac.ml)(line 188))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/rbac.ml)(line 197))((process xapi)
                                      (filename ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml)(line 77)))'
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   }
                                      Sep 15 10:00:32 xo1 xo-server[5582]: }
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]: 2025-09-15T14:00:35.240Z xo:xapi:vdi WARN invalid HTTP header in response body {
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   body: 'HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Error\r\n' +
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     'content-length: 318\r\n' +
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     'content-type: text/html\r\n' +
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     'connection: close\r\n' +
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     'cache-control: no-cache, no-store\r\n' +
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     '\r\n' +
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:     '<html><body><h1>HTTP 500 internal server error</h1>An unexpected error occurred; please wait a while and try again. If the problem persists, please
                                       contact your support representative.<h1> Additional information </h1>VDI_INCOMPATIBLE_TYPE: [ OpaqueRef:ec54186c-0ab5-0390-d244-64414e9d8887; CBT metadata ]</body></html>'
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]: }
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]: 2025-09-15T14:00:35.249Z xo:xapi:xapi-disks WARN can't compute delta OpaqueRef:888ccaa8-07c6-e6f0-3bfb-3e6b5ac4da2a from OpaqueRef:ec54186c-0ab5-0390-d2
                                      44-64414e9d8887, fallBack to a full {
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:   error: Error: invalid HTTP header in response body
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at checkVdiExport (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/vdi.mjs:36:19)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async Xapi.exportContent (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/vdi.mjs:244:5)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async #getExportStream (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/disks/XapiVhdStreamSource.mjs:123:20)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async XapiVhdStreamSource.init (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/disks/XapiVhdStreamSource.mjs:135:23)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async #openExportStream (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/disks/Xapi.mjs:128:7)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async #openNbdStream (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/disks/Xapi.mjs:81:22)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async XapiDiskSource.openSource (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/xapi/disks/Xapi.mjs:191:18)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async XapiDiskSource.init (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/disk-transform/dist/DiskPassthrough.mjs:28:41)
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]:       at async file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150942/@xen-orchestra/backups/_incrementalVm.mjs:67:5
                                      Sep 15 10:00:35 xo1 xo-server[5582]: }
                                      
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P Offline
                                        peo
                                        last edited by

                                        I'm currently testing the "fixed" version. At the time I ran the replications the first time, I expected and accepted it doing new "first" full backups/transfers, but even this small, singe-disk VM (the one for my XO) is still doing full transfers:
                                        fe04762a-02ed-4b4e-9e14-fcb7be8330d9-image.png

                                        This simple operation previously taking 2-5 minutes now takes 44 minutes:
                                        39bc2c0a-93dc-4627-8901-e24fb5ddf729-image.png

                                        Compared to the previous "normal" backup time:
                                        19407049-8301-4a15-8afd-d6e3f78f36c6-image.png

                                        The same goes for "Admin Ubuntu 24", single but slightly larger disk (50GB) which yesterday took 4 hours (initial "new" "first" backup, so I don't know if it still takes that time)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J Offline
                                          JB @florent
                                          last edited by

                                          @florent JOURNALCTL.jpeg

                                          I made the backup again and everything went back to normal. Everything is wonderful! Thank you so much!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • florentF Offline
                                            florent Vates πŸͺ XO Team
                                            last edited by

                                            @Andrew @peo
                                            are you using purge snapshot data ?
                                            In both case, can you try disabling it and disabling CBT on the relevant VMs ?

                                            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post