XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    no LTR possibility in MIRROR COPY JOB, no SMART copy either

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    5 Posts 3 Posters 62 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      Pilow
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I'm trying to get together homogeneous backup copies for client VMs that have backup copy option on our side.

      First of all, there is no LTR options possible in MIRROR COPY jobs. the only way to have more points in the backup copy is to get a longer retention in mirror copy job schedule than the source job schedule.
      Could we get LTR options also in mirror copy job ?

      Second point, mirror copy job is either all VMs from remote, or manually selected VMs, no possibility of "SMART" selection by tags.
      I'd like to be able to TAG VMs with client_name/backupcopy_option to autoselect the concerned VMs

      3858b9c7-fa8e-4c67-915f-771df2d5745c-image.png

      If you could get these demands in future dev, would be great 🙂

      Thanks in advance.

      @Bastien-Nollet @florent 😃

      Bastien NolletB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • P Offline
        Pilow
        last edited by Pilow

        and I noticed a "bug?" with mirror copy job ?

        Even if I only manually select one VM out of the 7 that are on the remote, they are "checked" by the job, but excluded by the job filter
        e06fdcfe-bc30-45a6-b583-21f64078e5e1-image.png

        on the remote, all 7 VMs folders are created, but only the copied VM contains data
        dc4ff839-74b6-4bfa-afa4-d6a0ed7082e9-image.png

        the copy is OK for the selected VM, but why check and create the other VMs/folders ?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Question for @Bastien-Nollet or @florent

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Bastien NolletB Offline
            Bastien Nollet Vates 🪐 XO Team @Pilow
            last edited by

            Hi @Pilow,

            We plan to make LTR available also for mirror backups and metadata backups in the future, but we didn't have the time to do it yet.

            Smart mode on mirror incremental backups would be a bit tricky to do, as it would require us to handle incomplete chains of backups, for cases when a tag is removed from a VM and then added back. We might still implement it in the future, though.

            About the bug you noticed about VMs showing in backup log despite being excluded, I think it was intentional at some point, but now it would make sense to remove it. Thanks for the feedback, we'll change this.

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • P Offline
              Pilow @Bastien Nollet
              last edited by

              @Bastien-Nollet I'm not a big fan of the way it is implemented right now : when you make a mirror copy, it first duplicate all the points then prune to the desired retention

              but if you keep this way of handling mirror copies, it has the advantage of not needing to handle incomplete chains ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post