XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports

    Development
    16
    58
    5977
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      swivvle
      last edited by

      Can we get a little more information on how we would create SR's with SMAPIv3 after installing xcp-ng-vdi-stream?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO
        olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
        last edited by

        Ping @ronan-a for that

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ronan-aR
          ronan-a Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€
          last edited by olivierlambert

          @swivvle You can create a ext4 SR like this:

          xe sr-create type=ext4-ng name-label=sr-test device-config:device=/dev/sda3
          

          For a basic filebased SR:

          xe sr-create type=filebased name-label=sr-test2 device-config:file-uri=/root/sr-folder
          

          Don't hesitate if you have other questions.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • AnonabharA
            Anonabhar
            last edited by

            Will it support LVMoiSCSI? Or, is that a future addition?

            ~Peg

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO
              olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
              last edited by olivierlambert

              You need to get rid of SMAPIv1 concepts ๐Ÿ˜‰ If you meant "iSCSI block" support, the answer for right now: no.

              It's a brand new approach so we'll take time to find the best one, to avoid all the mess that had SMAPIv1 on block devices (non thin, race conditions etc.)

              I think the next big "device type" support might be raw (passing a whole disk without any extra layer to the guest).

              _danielgurgel_ tjkreidlT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • S
                swivvle
                last edited by swivvle

                Edit: needed to do

                yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage --enablerepo='xcp-ng-testing'
                systemctl start qemuback.service

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  swivvle
                  last edited by swivvle

                  @ronan-a said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                  xe sr-create type=ext4-ng name-label=sr-test device-config:device=

                  I can create the SR, create the disk in the SR, but I cannot it attach it to a VM. Error is

                  "Please include a URI in the device-config " Both filebased and ext4 do this for me.

                  ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • _danielgurgel_
                    _danielgurgel @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert raw over iscsi?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO
                      olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                      last edited by olivierlambert

                      raw means any "whole" block device, meaning no snapshot, clone, no shared SR case, etc. Doesn't matter what's underneath. I would say the first use case is passing a whole drive to a VM (eg FreeNAS).

                      But yeah, you would be able to pass a LUN if you like ๐Ÿ™‚

                      C C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ronan-aR
                        ronan-a Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€ @swivvle
                        last edited by ronan-a

                        @swivvle What's your exact command line? Have you restarted the toolstack?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          cocoon XCP-ng Center Team ๐Ÿš๏ธ @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert
                          Hi, just one question to clarify:
                          does it mean I could map an untouched/unmodified LUN to a VM?
                          because I have a usecase where it is very important that the (very small) LUN is not modified as it is used as communication device between the storage system and the guest.
                          That would be great!
                          As soon as this is available I will do some testing!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO
                            olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                            last edited by

                            I think, yes.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • R
                              r1 XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€
                              last edited by r1

                              @Marc-pezin said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                              yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage

                              This needs to be # yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing

                              I tried following

                              [13:33 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                              ...
                              [13:34 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# systemctl start qemuback.service
                              [13:34 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# systemctl status qemuback.service
                              โ— qemuback.service - qemuback daemon
                                 Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/qemuback.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
                                Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/qemuback.service.d
                                         โ””โ”€slice.conf
                                 Active: active (running) since Sat 2019-10-05 13:34:59 IST; 5s ago
                               Main PID: 10221 (qemuback.py)
                                 CGroup: /control.slice/qemuback.service
                                         โ”œโ”€10221 /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/qemuback.py
                                         โ””โ”€10222 /usr/bin/xenstore-watch /local/domain/0/backend
                              
                              [13:35 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe sr-create type=filebased name-label=sr-test2 device-config:file-uri=/root/sr-folder
                              c6e9c83c-78ee-7727-dec3-1c7474aef533
                              [13:36 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# ls sr-folder/
                              1  db_backups  lock_db  lock_db_backup  lock_gl  meta.json  meta.lock  sqlite3-metadata.db
                              [13:37 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vbd-create vdi-uuid=cb6cf26c-b079-44e2-9466-3d61fc7ac553 vm-uuid=a00c837e-20ab-4b3b-b125-2a73df1070d2 device=5
                              6877ea3b-d3c7-e708-5b34-c5e61e5dd1eb
                              [13:37 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vbd-plug uuid=6877ea3b-d3c7-e708-5b34-c5e61e5dd1eb 
                              Error code: MISSING_URI
                              Error parameters: Please include a URI in the device-config
                              
                              
                              FYI
                              [13:38 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vdi-list uuid=cb6cf26c-b079-44e2-9466-3d61fc7ac553 
                              uuid ( RO)                : cb6cf26c-b079-44e2-9466-3d61fc7ac553
                                        name-label ( RW): New virtual disk (1)
                                  name-description ( RW): 
                                           sr-uuid ( RO): c6e9c83c-78ee-7727-dec3-1c7474aef533
                                      virtual-size ( RO): 1073741824
                                          sharable ( RO): false
                                         read-only ( RO): false
                              

                              What can be done for Error code: MISSING_URI?

                              Edit: I did not read the restart instruction.

                              After restarting tool stack it worked and disk attached as /dev/nbd0!

                              [13:55 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe-toolstack-restart 
                              Executing xe-toolstack-restart
                              done.
                              [13:56 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vbd-plug uuid=6877ea3b-d3c7-e708-5b34-c5e61e5dd1eb
                               
                              
                              Marc.pezinM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Marc.pezinM
                                Marc.pezin Vates ๐Ÿช Sales ๐ŸŽค @r1
                                last edited by

                                @r1 You are absolutely right, I have updated the command in the initial post and in the devblog. Thanks.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R
                                  r1 XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€ @Marc.pezin
                                  last edited by

                                  @Marc-pezin Thanks. I'd suggest to also add # xe-toolstack-restart so that Error code: MISSING_URI does not show up ๐Ÿ‘

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • R
                                    r1 XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€
                                    last edited by

                                    @ronan-a is VDI move from SMAPIv1 to SMAPIv3 supported?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO
                                      olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                      last edited by

                                      Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C
                                        cg @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                                        raw means any "whole" block device, meaning no snapshot, clone, no shared SR case, etc. Doesn't matter what's underneath. I would say the first use case is passing a whole drive to a VM (eg FreeNAS).

                                        But yeah, you would be able to pass a LUN if you like ๐Ÿ™‚

                                        Sounds a bit like VVOLs from VMware. Not sure how exactly they work but LUNs exclusively for VMs could be an easy thing, regarding TRIM/DISCARD etc.

                                        It just still needs mechanics for XAPI etc. to grab/backup them. Also Snapshots could be done with that, just a different logic.

                                        But first it's probably a target for people needing pure performance.

                                        @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                                        Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

                                        Noone noes if Citrix has plans at all - not even paying customers. Their communication is kind of a nightmare.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambertO
                                          olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                          last edited by

                                          Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration ๐Ÿ™‚

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            cg @olivierlambert
                                            last edited by

                                            @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                                            Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration ๐Ÿ™‚

                                            Any idea about the release date? I mean their "one release a quater" only worked for very short and they failed again with 8.1, which should have been released until 1st of October.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post