XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    63 Posts 16 Posters 33.6k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      What do you mean? SR file system or root filesystem?

      onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • onurO Offline
        onur @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

        What do you mean? SR file system or root filesystem?

        The Local Storage for VM.
        ![alt text](Ek Açıklama 2020-02-28 124558.png image url)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

          Check the output of mount instead.

          onurO borzelB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • onurO Offline
            onur @stormi
            last edited by

            here is the output. So I assume ext4 should be default when selecting EXT on the setup.

            @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

            I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

            Check the output of mount instead.

             mount
            sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
            proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
            devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,size=1270132k,nr_inodes=317533,mode=755)
            securityfs on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
            tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev)
            devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000)
            tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,mode=755)
            tmpfs on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (ro,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd)
            pstore on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/memory type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,memory)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls,net_prio)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices)
            cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer)
            configfs on /sys/kernel/config type configfs (rw,relatime)
            
            /dev/sda1 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime)
            
            debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,relatime)
            mqueue on /dev/mqueue type mqueue (rw,relatime)
            xenfs on /proc/xen type xenfs (rw,relatime)
            xenstore on /var/lib/xenstored type tmpfs (rw,relatime,mode=755)
            
            /dev/sda5 on /var/log type ext3 (rw,relatime)
            
            /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea-3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea on /run/sr-mount/3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea type ext4 (rw,relatime)
            
            tmpfs on /run/user/0 type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=256416k,mode=700)
            
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

              /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea-3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea on /run/sr-mount/3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea type ext4 (rw,relatime)

              It's ok, the SR is mounted as ext4 so this means it was created as ext4.

              onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • onurO Offline
                onur @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea-3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea on /run/sr-mount/3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea type ext4 (rw,relatime)

                It's ok, the SR is mounted as ext4 so this means it was created as ext4.

                great thank you very much @stormi . As you suspected, XCP-ng Center shows wrong format (I guess here is a bug for XCP-ng center devs)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  Please create an issue there: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/issues

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

                    onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • onurO Offline
                      onur @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                      What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

                      xe sr-param-list uuid=3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
                      uuid ( RO)                    : 3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
                                    name-label ( RW): ssd240Toshiba
                              name-description ( RW):
                                          host ( RO): OB1
                            allowed-operations (SRO): VDI.enable_cbt; VDI.list_changed_blocks; unplug; plug; PBD.create; VDI.disable_cbt; update; PBD.destroy; VDI.resize; VDI.clone; VDI.data_destroy; scan; VDI.snapshot; VDI.mirror; VDI.create; VDI.destroy; VDI.set_on_boot
                            current-operations (SRO):
                                          VDIs (SRO): 5da0c967-657f-43f2-8e4a-7cb80b7938ef; 2dd44491-b458-4119-a024-a48ace2a23e3; 05910aa1-8c5e-4af7-8ffc-11dbdcae5116; 60a7602d-ec61-4ef4-9db1-0f3fdbcd43f9
                                          PBDs (SRO): 96e685a7-f5cc-32fa-8289-b10e4a8ea4f5
                            virtual-allocation ( RO): 481036337152
                          physical-utilisation ( RO): 153255415808
                                 physical-size ( RO): 192280748032
                                          type ( RO): ext
                                  content-type ( RO): user
                                        shared ( RW): false
                                 introduced-by ( RO): <not in database>
                                   is-tools-sr ( RO): false
                                  other-config (MRW): i18n-original-value-name_label: Local storage; i18n-key: local-storage
                                     sm-config (MRO): devserial: scsi-3500080dc0133cdc2
                                         blobs ( RO):
                           local-cache-enabled ( RO): true
                                          tags (SRW):
                                     clustered ( RO): false
                      
                      
                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @onur
                        last edited by

                        @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                        type ( RO): ext

                        As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.

                        onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • onurO Offline
                          onur @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                          @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                          type ( RO): ext

                          As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.
                          already created bug for XCP-ng center, but it looks like system is not reporting ext type

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            Yes, it was just to be sure it's a XCP-ng Center issue 🙂 Now we are 100% sure.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • borzelB Offline
                              borzel XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
                              last edited by borzel

                              @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                              I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

                              Check the output of mount instead.

                              I think we should not trust 🙂 I assume the ext4 uses internally the same xapi-ID like the old ext.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                A better label would just be "ext" so that it works both for ext3 and ext4.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P Offline
                                  pnunn
                                  last edited by

                                  Running two hosts on the beta in my lab and so far have had no issues at all (touch wood). Looking forward to this hitting production.

                                  P.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Thanks for the feedback!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C Offline
                                      cnaumer
                                      last edited by

                                      Same here, a single host as well as two host pool are running fine so far. All upgraded via yum from 7.6.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • nikadeN Offline
                                        nikade Top contributor
                                        last edited by

                                        Did anyone try the performance of VM export/import yet?
                                        I am really excited to see the increase since this was one of the improvements mentioned by Citrix.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P Offline
                                          pnunn
                                          last edited by

                                          I've not imported full VM's but have imported a number of disks and they worked reasonably quickly I guess, although I have only very limited reference from another much more powerful setup to compare with.

                                          Peter.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                            last edited by

                                            This thread is now dead, long live the 8.1 RC thread!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post