XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    63 Posts 16 Posters 33.5k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      Please create an issue there: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/issues

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

        onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • onurO Offline
          onur @olivierlambert
          last edited by

          @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

          What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

          xe sr-param-list uuid=3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
          uuid ( RO)                    : 3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
                        name-label ( RW): ssd240Toshiba
                  name-description ( RW):
                              host ( RO): OB1
                allowed-operations (SRO): VDI.enable_cbt; VDI.list_changed_blocks; unplug; plug; PBD.create; VDI.disable_cbt; update; PBD.destroy; VDI.resize; VDI.clone; VDI.data_destroy; scan; VDI.snapshot; VDI.mirror; VDI.create; VDI.destroy; VDI.set_on_boot
                current-operations (SRO):
                              VDIs (SRO): 5da0c967-657f-43f2-8e4a-7cb80b7938ef; 2dd44491-b458-4119-a024-a48ace2a23e3; 05910aa1-8c5e-4af7-8ffc-11dbdcae5116; 60a7602d-ec61-4ef4-9db1-0f3fdbcd43f9
                              PBDs (SRO): 96e685a7-f5cc-32fa-8289-b10e4a8ea4f5
                virtual-allocation ( RO): 481036337152
              physical-utilisation ( RO): 153255415808
                     physical-size ( RO): 192280748032
                              type ( RO): ext
                      content-type ( RO): user
                            shared ( RW): false
                     introduced-by ( RO): <not in database>
                       is-tools-sr ( RO): false
                      other-config (MRW): i18n-original-value-name_label: Local storage; i18n-key: local-storage
                         sm-config (MRO): devserial: scsi-3500080dc0133cdc2
                             blobs ( RO):
               local-cache-enabled ( RO): true
                              tags (SRW):
                         clustered ( RO): false
          
          
          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @onur
            last edited by

            @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

            type ( RO): ext

            As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.

            onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • onurO Offline
              onur @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

              @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

              type ( RO): ext

              As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.
              already created bug for XCP-ng center, but it looks like system is not reporting ext type

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Yes, it was just to be sure it's a XCP-ng Center issue πŸ™‚ Now we are 100% sure.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • borzelB Offline
                  borzel XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
                  last edited by borzel

                  @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                  I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

                  Check the output of mount instead.

                  I think we should not trust πŸ™‚ I assume the ext4 uses internally the same xapi-ID like the old ext.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by

                    A better label would just be "ext" so that it works both for ext3 and ext4.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      pnunn
                      last edited by

                      Running two hosts on the beta in my lab and so far have had no issues at all (touch wood). Looking forward to this hitting production.

                      P.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Thanks for the feedback!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C Offline
                          cnaumer
                          last edited by

                          Same here, a single host as well as two host pool are running fine so far. All upgraded via yum from 7.6.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • nikadeN Offline
                            nikade Top contributor
                            last edited by

                            Did anyone try the performance of VM export/import yet?
                            I am really excited to see the increase since this was one of the improvements mentioned by Citrix.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P Offline
                              pnunn
                              last edited by

                              I've not imported full VM's but have imported a number of disks and they worked reasonably quickly I guess, although I have only very limited reference from another much more powerful setup to compare with.

                              Peter.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                This thread is now dead, long live the 8.1 RC thread!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post