XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    63 Posts 16 Posters 33.5k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

      onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • onurO Offline
        onur @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

        What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

        xe sr-param-list uuid=3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
        uuid ( RO)                    : 3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
                      name-label ( RW): ssd240Toshiba
                name-description ( RW):
                            host ( RO): OB1
              allowed-operations (SRO): VDI.enable_cbt; VDI.list_changed_blocks; unplug; plug; PBD.create; VDI.disable_cbt; update; PBD.destroy; VDI.resize; VDI.clone; VDI.data_destroy; scan; VDI.snapshot; VDI.mirror; VDI.create; VDI.destroy; VDI.set_on_boot
              current-operations (SRO):
                            VDIs (SRO): 5da0c967-657f-43f2-8e4a-7cb80b7938ef; 2dd44491-b458-4119-a024-a48ace2a23e3; 05910aa1-8c5e-4af7-8ffc-11dbdcae5116; 60a7602d-ec61-4ef4-9db1-0f3fdbcd43f9
                            PBDs (SRO): 96e685a7-f5cc-32fa-8289-b10e4a8ea4f5
              virtual-allocation ( RO): 481036337152
            physical-utilisation ( RO): 153255415808
                   physical-size ( RO): 192280748032
                            type ( RO): ext
                    content-type ( RO): user
                          shared ( RW): false
                   introduced-by ( RO): <not in database>
                     is-tools-sr ( RO): false
                    other-config (MRW): i18n-original-value-name_label: Local storage; i18n-key: local-storage
                       sm-config (MRO): devserial: scsi-3500080dc0133cdc2
                           blobs ( RO):
             local-cache-enabled ( RO): true
                            tags (SRW):
                       clustered ( RO): false
        
        
        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @onur
          last edited by

          @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

          type ( RO): ext

          As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.

          onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • onurO Offline
            onur @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

            @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

            type ( RO): ext

            As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.
            already created bug for XCP-ng center, but it looks like system is not reporting ext type

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Yes, it was just to be sure it's a XCP-ng Center issue πŸ™‚ Now we are 100% sure.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • borzelB Offline
                borzel XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
                last edited by borzel

                @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

                Check the output of mount instead.

                I think we should not trust πŸ™‚ I assume the ext4 uses internally the same xapi-ID like the old ext.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  A better label would just be "ext" so that it works both for ext3 and ext4.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    pnunn
                    last edited by

                    Running two hosts on the beta in my lab and so far have had no issues at all (touch wood). Looking forward to this hitting production.

                    P.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Thanks for the feedback!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        cnaumer
                        last edited by

                        Same here, a single host as well as two host pool are running fine so far. All upgraded via yum from 7.6.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • nikadeN Offline
                          nikade Top contributor
                          last edited by

                          Did anyone try the performance of VM export/import yet?
                          I am really excited to see the increase since this was one of the improvements mentioned by Citrix.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            pnunn
                            last edited by

                            I've not imported full VM's but have imported a number of disks and they worked reasonably quickly I guess, although I have only very limited reference from another much more powerful setup to compare with.

                            Peter.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                              last edited by

                              This thread is now dead, long live the 8.1 RC thread!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • First post
                                Last post