XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    News
    16
    63
    7924
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • onurO
      onur @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

      @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

      type ( RO): ext

      As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.
      already created bug for XCP-ng center, but it looks like system is not reporting ext type

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO
        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder🦸 CEO πŸ§‘β€πŸ’Ό
        last edited by

        Yes, it was just to be sure it's a XCP-ng Center issue πŸ™‚ Now we are 100% sure.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • borzelB
          borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ @stormi
          last edited by borzel

          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

          I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

          Check the output of mount instead.

          I think we should not trust πŸ™‚ I assume the ext4 uses internally the same xapi-ID like the old ext.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS
            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€
            last edited by

            A better label would just be "ext" so that it works both for ext3 and ext4.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              pnunn
              last edited by

              Running two hosts on the beta in my lab and so far have had no issues at all (touch wood). Looking forward to this hitting production.

              P.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • olivierlambertO
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder🦸 CEO πŸ§‘β€πŸ’Ό
                last edited by

                Thanks for the feedback!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  cnaumer
                  last edited by

                  Same here, a single host as well as two host pool are running fine so far. All upgraded via yum from 7.6.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nikadeN
                    nikade
                    last edited by

                    Did anyone try the performance of VM export/import yet?
                    I am really excited to see the increase since this was one of the improvements mentioned by Citrix.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      pnunn
                      last edited by

                      I've not imported full VM's but have imported a number of disks and they worked reasonably quickly I guess, although I have only very limited reference from another much more powerful setup to compare with.

                      Peter.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS
                        stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€
                        last edited by

                        This thread is now dead, long live the 8.1 RC thread!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post