XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    42 Posts 15 Posters 11.5k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
      last edited by stormi

      I would have been interested in debugging why the system didn't boot successfully after an update using yum. Can you give us more details?

      To migrate the ZFS SR, the only clean way I am aware of is to create a new one. There may be a hacky way but it would probably involve modifying XAPI database objects dans metadata written in the SR itself so I wouldn't attempt it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @brezlord
        last edited by

        @brezlord said in XCP-ng 8.2.0 beta now available!:

        Could not change pool master from 8.2.0-beta to 8.1.0 host. Get Unknown error from peer.

        When you get such error in XO, there's usually more information in XO's log page. However, it is expected that you can't move the master to a host running a lower release.

        Both host on 8.2.0-beta, shut down host-02 which was not the pool master and the shared storage shows partially connected and no stats available for storage. Reboot host-02 and shared storage is now healthy and stats are back. Disabled host-02 and shutdown and still had the same issue as above. The only was to get stats back and get shares storage back to healthy and stats working is to forget the storage attached to host-02 that was shut down.

        Ok, I don't think it's a regression but it may be interesting to create a GitHub issue with all the details.

        Had to reinstall xscontainer package to have docker container visibility in XO.

        That is expected, unless you upgrade using yum.

        if you need any specific tests just let me know.

        If your host has an nVIDIA GPU, we would be interested in knowing it because there used to be bugs specific to hosts with such a GPU, even when not used.

        And be ready for testing UEFI VMs soon! I'll post here when the updated uefistored package is available.

        T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • brezlordB Offline
          brezlord
          last edited by

          Thanks for the info. So doing a ISO update is essentially like a fresh install but keeps settings.

          I don't have any nVIDIA GPUs, sorry can't help there.

          I'll boot the second host and get more info to raise an issue for the SR problem.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • brezlordB Offline
            brezlord
            last edited by

            I have raised issue https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/439 for the above SR problem.

            brezlord created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp

            open Shared storage & XCP-ng tools show partially connected when 1 of 2 hosts shutdown. #439

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • T Offline
              technot @stormi
              last edited by

              And be ready for testing UEFI VMs soon! I'll post here when the updated uefistored package is available.

              Does the host have to be booted in UEFI mode for UEFI VMs to function?

              If it does, is there an easy way to make the change from legacy to UEFI?
              All I know, is the install docs clearly state you should never change mode when upgrading.
              Is the only way to export all the vms, and reinstall, then import the vms back?

              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @technot
                last edited by

                @technot said in XCP-ng 8.2.0 beta now available!:

                Does the host have to be booted in UEFI mode for UEFI VMs to function?

                No, it's not related to the host's mode.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • T Offline
                  technot @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi
                  Is it only lacking to get built/compiled? If so I could do it sometime during the weekend. Or has the code not been updated to reflect any changes done with xcp-ng 8.2. If the latter, I am afraid I cant help.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by

                    It's not ready yet so you can't help now. Our developer who wrote that piece of code (uefistored) is chasing the last known bugs and then I'll build an update and push it to our RPM repository for XCP-ng 8.2. I'll announce it when it's ready.

                    T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • T Offline
                      technot
                      last edited by

                      I dont know if this is expected behaviour, after upgrading all the way from 7.6 to 8.2 beta. But on a windows guest I have an AMD gpu in full pci passthrough, the device didnt show up after boot. And instead there was another device showing fault.
                      Intel 8237sb pci to usb universal host controller, was throwing an error 43.
                      And under Display adapters, there was only the microsoft remote emulated and a "Microsoft Basic" devices showing.
                      I reinstalled the AMD driver, and rebooted. And it came back to life.

                      Also, I must say the vms feel snappier. Faster boots, and less delay/latency. But I have not meassured pre/post, so its only a feeling!:D

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        technot @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi
                        Im sorry, it wasnt clear. What I meant is XCP-ng Center. If that code has been updated, or just a question of compiling it.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • borzelB Offline
                          borzel XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi Heyho! I'll try to find some time. But first I'll setup an XCP-ng 8.2 host πŸ™‚

                          borzelB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • borzelB Offline
                            borzel XCP-ng Center Team @borzel
                            last edited by

                            https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/issues/195

                            borzel created this issue in xcp-ng/xenadmin

                            closed XCP-ng Center for XCP-ng 8.2 #195

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • ForzaF Offline
                              Forza
                              last edited by

                              Hi! When will 8.2 be released, and will there be an easy upgrade between 8.1 and 8.2?

                              I am currently setting up a new pool of EPYC servers to replace some older Xeon servers and well, I'd like to go on 8.2 right away if it is released soon πŸ™‚

                              B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B Offline
                                Biggen @Forza
                                last edited by Biggen

                                @S-Pam Literally the first post has a big bold headline that tells exactly how you go about upgrading by linking to the docs.

                                And then in the sixth post from the top Oliver says it’s reasonable to believe the final release will be in 2 months.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  And I expect that XCP-ng 8.2.0 will be perfectly stable well before we release it officially. The main missing piece is fixes to UEFI VM support.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    I just pushed xcp-ng-pv-tools-8.2.0-1.xcpng8.2.noarch.rpm to the 8.2 base repository. Beta testers can install it with a simple yum update. No reboot required. Please check that :

                                    • guest tools attached to existing VMs are detached during the update
                                    • the new guest tools ISO is available for attaching to VMs after the update
                                    • the updated README.txt looks fine (updated links to the docs, and added a FreeBSD section)
                                    • tools can be installed to linux and FreeBSD VMs
                                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                    • D Offline
                                      demanzke @stormi
                                      last edited by

                                      @stormi The new iso worked as usual on a Ubuntu 20.04 VM.
                                      README text formatting looks fine, updating guest tools using the install.sh worked.
                                      When done it still asks the user to reboot the VM though.
                                      Without a working XCP-ng center I'm not sure how to test the guest tools features.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        @demanzke with the preferred client for XCP-ng: Xen Orchestra πŸ™‚ You'll have Ubuntu logo and VM IP address πŸ™‚

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by

                                          The new implementation of UEFI support for VMs just landed through the last update to the beta.

                                          yum update will install uefistored-0.2.1-1.xcpng8.2.x86_64, then a simple xe-toolstack-restart will take it into account.

                                          Dedicated thread for tests, feedback, debug and discussion: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/32335

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                          • ChuckNorrisonC Offline
                                            ChuckNorrison
                                            last edited by ChuckNorrison

                                            Upgrade finally done, works flawlessly. Citrix Hypervisor 8.2 -> XCP-ng 8.2 beta.

                                            Iam using Ubuntu 20.04 Server VMs and a single Windows 10 VM (uefi). NFS Storage is used for Backups and SMB ISO Library.

                                            • Patches got applied successful
                                            • Several Host restarts successful
                                            • Create VM successful
                                            • USB Passthrough to Ubuntu 20.04 with APC-1400 USV successful
                                            • Dynamic Memory settings successful

                                            You make me happy πŸ™‚

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post