-
@ronan-a might take a look if he found a minute free (which is complicated right now
) -
@olivierlambert @Jonathon Unfortunately we don't maintain this package, so it's not available in our repositories, the simplest thing is that you address this problem directly to linbit. Maybe there is a regression or something else?
-
This post is deleted! -
I spoke with one of our developers. He said:
"When I search for
Device read short 40960 bytes remainingI only get results for XCP-ng/Citrix with LVM. So I think this is an issue with LVM on xcp-ng. One thing we changed between thin-send-recv 1.0.X and 1.1.X is the error handling, so now errors are properly propagated. So I would guess it was always broken but newer versions actually make the error visible."
Not sure if that helps, but if there is anything to relay I'm more than happy to pass it along.
-
@BHellman Appreciate the weigh in and the time from your dev.
Ok yeah I thought I was having a hallucination lol. v1.0.1 was 100% working when I installed it at time of my posting, and it was failing today. Restarting all the satellites and it works, assuming it will break again.
When it actually works, I can see the pvc in s3 remote
Here are a scatter of commands and outputs. In this I restarted the satellites, so it may be difficult to read but thought it would be better then nothing.
commands-and-outputs.txtxen01-linstor-Satellite.txt
xen02-linstor-Satellite.txt
xen03-linstor-Satellite.txt -
And now for something completely different lol.It's the same thing
We have a new xcp-ng cluster that we would like to migrate everything to. Not migrating k8s clusters, creating new ones on a new RKE2 rancher. So to migrate the applications it would simplify things if I could move pvc's over.
Command that fails, same if I add
--target-storage-pool xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_devicejonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 backup ship newCluster pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f ERROR: Description: Remote 'newCluster': Could not find suitable storage pool to receive backup Cause: ErrorReport id on target cluster: 66FF0E92-00000-000011Setup remotes
jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 controller list-properties ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ Key ┊ Value ┊ ╞═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ Cluster/LocalID ┊ 941fc610-acb9-484a-9837-d2c0df8a86aa jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 controller list-properties ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ Key ┊ Value ┊ ╞═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ Cluster/LocalID ┊ 717be8f7-1aec-4830-9aab-cc0afba0dd3a linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 remote create linstor newCluster 10.2.0.10 --cluster-id 717be8f7-1aec-4830-9aab-cc0afba0dd3a linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 remote create linstor sourceCluster 10.2.0.19 --cluster-id 941fc610-acb9-484a-9837-d2c0df8a86aaNothing interesting in any satellite logs.
Error on new clusterjonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 err show 66FF0E92-00000-000011 ERROR REPORT 66FF0E92-00000-000011 ============================================================ Application: LINBIT® LINSTOR Module: Controller Version: 1.26.1 Build ID: 12746ac9c6e7882807972c3df56e9a89eccad4e5 Build time: 2024-02-22T05:27:50+00:00 Error time: 2024-10-07 14:51:35 Node: ovbh-pprod-xen01 Thread: MainWorkerPool-3 ============================================================ Reported error: =============== Category: RuntimeException Class name: ApiRcException Class canonical name: com.linbit.linstor.core.apicallhandler.response.ApiRcException Generated at: Method 'restoreBackupL2LInTransaction', Source file 'CtrlBackupRestoreApiCallHandler.java', Line #1123 Error message: Could not find suitable storage pool to receive backup Asynchronous stage backtrace: Error has been observed at the following site(s): *__checkpoint ⇢ restore backup *__checkpoint ⇢ Backupshipping L2L start receive Original Stack Trace: Call backtrace: Method Native Class:Line number restoreBackupL2LInTransaction N com.linbit.linstor.core.apicallhandler.controller.backup.CtrlBackupRestoreApiCallHandler:1123 Suppressed exception 1 of 1: =============== Category: RuntimeException Class name: OnAssemblyException Class canonical name: reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly.OnAssemblyException Generated at: Method 'restoreBackupL2LInTransaction', Source file 'CtrlBackupRestoreApiCallHandler.java', Line #1123 Error message: Error has been observed at the following site(s): *__checkpoint ⇢ restore backup *__checkpoint ⇢ Backupshipping L2L start receive Original Stack Trace: Call backtrace: Method Native Class:Line number restoreBackupL2LInTransaction N com.linbit.linstor.core.apicallhandler.controller.backup.CtrlBackupRestoreApiCallHandler:1123 lambda$startReceivingInTransaction$4 N com.linbit.linstor.core.apicallhandler.controller.backup.CtrlBackupL2LDstApiCallHandler:526 doInScope N com.linbit.linstor.core.apicallhandler.ScopeRunner:149 lambda$fluxInScope$0 N com.linbit.linstor.core.apicallhandler.ScopeRunner:76 call N reactor.core.publisher.MonoCallable:72 trySubscribeScalarMap N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap:127 subscribeOrReturn N reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMapMany:49 subscribe N reactor.core.publisher.Flux:8759 onNext N reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMapMany$FlatMapManyMain:195 request N reactor.core.publisher.Operators$ScalarSubscription:2545 onSubscribe N reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMapMany$FlatMapManyMain:141 subscribe N reactor.core.publisher.MonoJust:55 subscribe N reactor.core.publisher.MonoDeferContextual:55 subscribe N reactor.core.publisher.Flux:8773 onNext N reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMapMany$FlatMapManyMain:195 onNext N reactor.core.publisher.FluxMapFuseable$MapFuseableSubscriber:129 completePossiblyEmpty N reactor.core.publisher.Operators$BaseFluxToMonoOperator:2071 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.MonoCollect$CollectSubscriber:145 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMapMany$FlatMapManyInner:260 checkTerminated N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:847 drainLoop N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:609 drain N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:589 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:466 checkTerminated N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:847 drainLoop N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:609 innerComplete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:895 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapInner:998 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxMap$MapSubscriber:144 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.Operators$MultiSubscriptionSubscriber:2205 onComplete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxSwitchIfEmpty$SwitchIfEmptySubscriber:85 complete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxCreate$BaseSink:460 drain N reactor.core.publisher.FluxCreate$BufferAsyncSink:805 complete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxCreate$BufferAsyncSink:753 drainLoop N reactor.core.publisher.FluxCreate$SerializedFluxSink:247 drain N reactor.core.publisher.FluxCreate$SerializedFluxSink:213 complete N reactor.core.publisher.FluxCreate$SerializedFluxSink:204 apiCallComplete N com.linbit.linstor.netcom.TcpConnectorPeer:506 handleComplete N com.linbit.linstor.proto.CommonMessageProcessor:372 handleDataMessage N com.linbit.linstor.proto.CommonMessageProcessor:296 doProcessInOrderMessage N com.linbit.linstor.proto.CommonMessageProcessor:244 lambda$doProcessMessage$4 N com.linbit.linstor.proto.CommonMessageProcessor:229 subscribe N reactor.core.publisher.FluxDefer:46 subscribe N reactor.core.publisher.Flux:8773 onNext N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlatMap$FlatMapMain:427 drainAsync N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlattenIterable$FlattenIterableSubscriber:453 drain N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlattenIterable$FlattenIterableSubscriber:724 onNext N reactor.core.publisher.FluxFlattenIterable$FlattenIterableSubscriber:256 drainFused N reactor.core.publisher.SinkManyUnicast:319 drain N reactor.core.publisher.SinkManyUnicast:362 tryEmitNext N reactor.core.publisher.SinkManyUnicast:237 tryEmitNext N reactor.core.publisher.SinkManySerialized:100 processInOrder N com.linbit.linstor.netcom.TcpConnectorPeer:419 doProcessMessage N com.linbit.linstor.proto.CommonMessageProcessor:227 lambda$processMessage$2 N com.linbit.linstor.proto.CommonMessageProcessor:164 onNext N reactor.core.publisher.FluxPeek$PeekSubscriber:185 runAsync N reactor.core.publisher.FluxPublishOn$PublishOnSubscriber:440 run N reactor.core.publisher.FluxPublishOn$PublishOnSubscriber:527 call N reactor.core.scheduler.WorkerTask:84 call N reactor.core.scheduler.WorkerTask:37 run N java.util.concurrent.FutureTask:264 run N java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask:304 runWorker N java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor:1128 run N java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker:628 run N java.lang.Thread:829 END OF ERROR REPORT.Info on new cluster
jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 r l | grep -e "pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f" | pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f | ovbh-pprod-xen10 | 7117 | Unused | Ok | UpToDate | 2023-05-31 14:42:09 | | pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f | ovbh-pprod-xen12 | 7117 | Unused | Ok | UpToDate | 2023-05-31 14:42:09 | | pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f | ovbh-pprod-xen13 | 7117 | Unused | Ok | UpToDate | 2023-05-31 14:42:07 | | pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f | ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker01 | 7117 | InUse | Ok | Diskless | 2024-08-09 11:31:25 | | pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f | ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker03 | 7117 | Unused | Ok | Diskless | 2024-06-13 14:15:57 | jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 rd l | grep -e "pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f" | pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f | 7117 | sc-74e1434b-b435-587e-9dea-fa067deec898 | ok | jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 rg l ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ ResourceGroup ┊ SelectFilter ┊ VlmNrs ┊ Description ┊ ╞═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ DfltRscGrp ┊ PlaceCount: 2 ┊ ┊ ┊ ╞┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╡ ┊ sc-74e1434b-b435-587e-9dea-fa067deec898 ┊ PlaceCount: 3 ┊ 0 ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ DisklessOnRemaining: True ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ LayerStack: ['DRBD', 'STORAGE'] ┊ ┊ ┊ ╞┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╡ ┊ sc-b066e430-6206-5588-a490-cc91ecef53d6 ┊ PlaceCount: 1 ┊ 0 ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ DisklessOnRemaining: True ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ LayerStack: ['DRBD', 'STORAGE'] ┊ ┊ ┊ ╞┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╡ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ PlaceCount: 3 ┊ 0 ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ StoragePool(s): xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ DisklessOnRemaining: True ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ LayerStack: ['DRBD', 'STORAGE'] ┊ ┊ ┊ ╰───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 sp l ╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ StoragePool ┊ Node ┊ Driver ┊ PoolName ┊ FreeCapacity ┊ TotalCapacity ┊ CanSnapshots ┊ State ┊ SharedName ┊ ╞══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen10 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen10;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen11 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen11;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen12 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen12;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen13 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen13;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker01 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker01;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker02 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker02;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker03 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker03;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker07 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker07;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker01 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker01;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker02 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker02;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker03 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker03;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker04 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker04;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen10 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 2.48 TiB ┊ 3.49 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen10;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen11 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 2.42 TiB ┊ 3.49 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen11;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen12 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 2.83 TiB ┊ 3.49 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen12;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen13 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 4.12 TiB ┊ 4.99 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen13;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯On the new cluster
jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 rg l ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ ResourceGroup ┊ SelectFilter ┊ VlmNrs ┊ Description ┊ ╞═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ DfltRscGrp ┊ PlaceCount: 2 ┊ ┊ ┊ ╞┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╡ ┊ sc-74e1434b-b435-587e-9dea-fa067deec898 ┊ PlaceCount: 3 ┊ 0 ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ DisklessOnRemaining: True ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ LayerStack: ['DRBD', 'STORAGE'] ┊ ┊ ┊ ╞┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╡ ┊ xcp-ha-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ PlaceCount: 3 ┊ 0 ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ StoragePool(s): xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ DisklessOnRemaining: False ┊ ┊ ┊ ╞┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╡ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ PlaceCount: 3 ┊ 0 ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ StoragePool(s): xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ DisklessOnRemaining: False ┊ ┊ ┊ ╰───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 sp l ╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ StoragePool ┊ Node ┊ Driver ┊ PoolName ┊ FreeCapacity ┊ TotalCapacity ┊ CanSnapshots ┊ State ┊ SharedName ┊ ╞══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen01 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen01;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen02 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen02;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen03 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen03;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-rancher01 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-rancher01;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-rancher02 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-rancher02;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vprod-rancher03 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vprod-rancher03;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker01 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker01;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker02 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker02;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker03 ┊ DISKLESS ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ False ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker03;DfltDisklessStorPool ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen01 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 13.75 TiB ┊ 13.97 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen01;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen02 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 13.75 TiB ┊ 13.97 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen02;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ┊ xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen03 ┊ LVM_THIN ┊ linstor_group/thin_device ┊ 13.75 TiB ┊ 13.97 TiB ┊ True ┊ Ok ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen03;xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device ┊ ╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ -
Turns out I did not have
SOCATon the new linstor cluster, and that was why I was getting that error messageI am able to run the command
jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 backup create linbit-velero-preprod-backup pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker01' for snapshot SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker03' for snapshot SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen13' for snapshot SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen12' for snapshot SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen10' for snapshot SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker01' SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker03' SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen13' SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen12' SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen10' SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker01' after snapshot SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-vtest-k8s02-worker03' after snapshot SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen13' after snapshot SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen12' after snapshot SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen10' after snapshot INFO: Generated snapshot name for backup of resourcepvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f to remote linbit-velero-preprod-backup INFO: Shipping of resource pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f to remote linbit-velero-preprod-backup in progress. SUCCESS: Started shipping of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' SUCCESS: Started shipping of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' SUCCESS: Started shipping of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f'But over an hour later it has still not finished.
jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 s l ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ ResourceName ┊ SnapshotName ┊ NodeNames ┊ Volumes ┊ CreatedOn ┊ State ┊ ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f ┊ back_20241009_161658_5ttp634a ┊ ovbh-pprod-xen01 ┊ 0: 8 GiB ┊ 2024-10-09 13:17:02 ┊ Restoring ┊ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 rd l ╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ ResourceName ┊ Port ┊ ResourceGroup ┊ State ┊ ╞══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f ┊ ┊ DfltRscGrp ┊ ok ┊ ╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯Seems like it might be the same issue as S3.
2024_10_09 16:17:00.885 [MainWorkerPool-11] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Snapshot 'back_20241009_161658' of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' registered. 2024_10_09 16:17:00.886 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Aligning /dev/linstor_group/pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000 size from 8390440 KiB to 8392704 KiB to be a multiple of extent size 4096 KiB (from Storage Pool) 2024_10_09 16:17:01.034 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' [DRBD] adjusted. 2024_10_09 16:17:01.262 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 96 2024_10_09 16:17:01.262 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 97 2024_10_09 16:17:01.301 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 97 2024_10_09 16:17:01.301 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 98 2024_10_09 16:17:02.765 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 98 2024_10_09 16:17:02.766 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 99 2024_10_09 16:17:02.774 [MainWorkerPool-1] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Snapshot 'back_20241009_161658' of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' registered. 2024_10_09 16:17:02.774 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Aligning /dev/linstor_group/pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000 size from 8390440 KiB to 8392704 KiB to be a multiple of extent size 4096 KiB (from Storage Pool) 2024_10_09 16:17:03.012 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' [DRBD] adjusted. 2024_10_09 16:17:03.037 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: 2024/10/09 16:17:03 socat[23463] E connect(5, AF=2 10.2.0.10:12012, 16): No route to host 2024_10_09 16:17:03.092 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 40960 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.094 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 40960 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.095 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 94208 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.095 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 57856 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.099 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 94208 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.100 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 57856 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.109 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 82432 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.248 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 40960 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.249 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 40960 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.250 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 94208 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.251 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 57856 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.254 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 94208 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.256 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 57856 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.266 [pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000_back_20241009_161658] WARN LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - stdErr: Device read short 82432 bytes remaining 2024_10_09 16:17:03.282 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 99 2024_10_09 16:17:03.282 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 100 2024_10_09 16:17:03.288 [MainWorkerPool-3] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Snapshot 'back_20241009_161658' of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' registered. 2024_10_09 16:17:03.289 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Aligning /dev/linstor_group/pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000 size from 8390440 KiB to 8392704 KiB to be a multiple of extent size 4096 KiB (from Storage Pool) 2024_10_09 16:17:03.421 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' [DRBD] adjusted. 2024_10_09 16:17:03.644 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 100 2024_10_09 16:17:03.644 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 101 2024_10_09 16:17:03.674 [MainWorkerPool-5] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Snapshot 'back_20241009_161658' of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' registered. 2024_10_09 16:17:03.674 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Aligning /dev/linstor_group/pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f_00000 size from 8390440 KiB to 8392704 KiB to be a multiple of extent size 4096 KiB (from Storage Pool) 2024_10_09 16:17:03.807 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' [DRBD] adjusted. 2024_10_09 16:17:04.031 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 101 2024_10_09 16:17:04.031 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 102 2024_10_09 16:47:03.682 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - End DeviceManager cycle 102 2024_10_09 16:47:03.682 [DeviceManager] INFO LINSTOR/Satellite - SYSTEM - Begin DeviceManager cycle 103Full log: linstor-satellite.txt
No Error Report on either cluster
-
I am curious if anyone else can replicate this, as it is just attempting to move a resource between two xostor clusters? If it is just me I can continue troubleshooting, otherwise it would be nice to know it is an exercise in futility.
But I am well aware that the release a few days ago has everyone swamped and this can wait, would just be awesome to know as it would change migration plans.
https://linbit.com/drbd-user-guide/linstor-guide-1_0-en/#s-linstor-snapshots-shipping
thin-send-recv is needed to ship data when using LVM thin-provisioned volumes
Yeah this seems to be for any type of shipping, s3 or otherwise.
-
So, did more testing. Looks like thin_send_recv is not the problem, but maybe socat.
I am able to manually migrate resource between XOSTOR (linstor) cluster using thin_send_recv. I have encluded all steps below so that it can be replicated.And we know socat is used, cause it complains if it is not there.
jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 backup ship newCluster pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f INFO: Cannot use node 'ovbh-pprod-xen10' as it does not support the tool(s): SOCAT INFO: Cannot use node 'ovbh-pprod-xen12' as it does not support the tool(s): SOCAT INFO: Cannot use node 'ovbh-pprod-xen13' as it does not support the tool(s): SOCAT ERROR: Backup shipping of resource 'pvc-086a5817-d813-41fe-86d8-3fac2ae2028f' cannot be started since there is no node available that supports backup shipping.Using 1.0.1 thin_send_recv.
[16:16 ovbh-pprod-xen11 ~]# thin_send --version 1.0.1 [16:16 ovbh-pprod-xen01 ~]# thin_recv --version 1.0.1Versions of socat match.
[16:16 ovbh-pprod-xen11 ~]# socat -V socat by Gerhard Rieger and contributors - see www.dest-unreach.org socat version 1.7.3.2 on Aug 4 2017 04:57:10 running on Linux version #1 SMP Tue Jan 23 14:12:55 CET 2024, release 4.19.0+1, machine x86_64 features: #define WITH_STDIO 1 #define WITH_FDNUM 1 #define WITH_FILE 1 #define WITH_CREAT 1 #define WITH_GOPEN 1 #define WITH_TERMIOS 1 #define WITH_PIPE 1 #define WITH_UNIX 1 #define WITH_ABSTRACT_UNIXSOCKET 1 #define WITH_IP4 1 #define WITH_IP6 1 #define WITH_RAWIP 1 #define WITH_GENERICSOCKET 1 #define WITH_INTERFACE 1 #define WITH_TCP 1 #define WITH_UDP 1 #define WITH_SCTP 1 #define WITH_LISTEN 1 #define WITH_SOCKS4 1 #define WITH_SOCKS4A 1 #define WITH_PROXY 1 #define WITH_SYSTEM 1 #define WITH_EXEC 1 #define WITH_READLINE 1 #define WITH_TUN 1 #define WITH_PTY 1 #define WITH_OPENSSL 1 #undef WITH_FIPS #define WITH_LIBWRAP 1 #define WITH_SYCLS 1 #define WITH_FILAN 1 #define WITH_RETRY 1 #define WITH_MSGLEVEL 0 /*debug*/ ... [16:17 ovbh-pprod-xen01 ~]# socat -V socat by Gerhard Rieger and contributors - see www.dest-unreach.org socat version 1.7.3.2 on Aug 4 2017 04:57:10 running on Linux version #1 SMP Tue Jan 23 14:12:55 CET 2024, release 4.19.0+1, machine x86_64 features: #define WITH_STDIO 1 #define WITH_FDNUM 1 #define WITH_FILE 1 #define WITH_CREAT 1 #define WITH_GOPEN 1 #define WITH_TERMIOS 1 #define WITH_PIPE 1 #define WITH_UNIX 1 #define WITH_ABSTRACT_UNIXSOCKET 1 #define WITH_IP4 1 #define WITH_IP6 1 #define WITH_RAWIP 1 #define WITH_GENERICSOCKET 1 #define WITH_INTERFACE 1 #define WITH_TCP 1 #define WITH_UDP 1 #define WITH_SCTP 1 #define WITH_LISTEN 1 #define WITH_SOCKS4 1 #define WITH_SOCKS4A 1 #define WITH_PROXY 1 #define WITH_SYSTEM 1 #define WITH_EXEC 1 #define WITH_READLINE 1 #define WITH_TUN 1 #define WITH_PTY 1 #define WITH_OPENSSL 1 #undef WITH_FIPS #define WITH_LIBWRAP 1 #define WITH_SYCLS 1 #define WITH_FILAN 1 #define WITH_RETRY 1 #define WITH_MSGLEVEL 0 /*debug*/Full steps needed to manually migrate a volume in XOSTOR, and have it running and tested in k8s.
Prep migration
[13:29 ovbh-pprod-xen11 ~]# lvs --noheadings --units B -o lv_size linstor_group/pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000 Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 94208 bytes remaining Device read short 57856 bytes remaining Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 94208 bytes remaining Device read short 57856 bytes remaining Device read short 82432 bytes remaining 26851934208B [13:53 ovbh-pprod-xen01 ~]# lvcreate -V 26851934208B --thinpool linstor_group/thin_device -n pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000 linstor_group Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 40960 bytes remaining Device read short 82432 bytes remaining Logical volume "pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000" created.Create snapshot
15:35:03] jonathon@jonathon-framework:~$ linstor --controller 10.2.0.19 s create pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d s_test SUCCESS: Description: New snapshot 's_test' of resource 'pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d' registered. Details: Snapshot 's_test' of resource 'pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d' UUID is: 3a07d2fd-6dc3-4994-b13f-8c3a2bb206b8 SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d]' on 'ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker02' for snapshot SUCCESS: Suspended IO of '[pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen11' for snapshot SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d]' on 'ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker02' SUCCESS: Took snapshot of '[pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen11' SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d]' on 'ovbh-vprod-k8s04-worker02' after snapshot SUCCESS: Resumed IO of '[pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d]' on 'ovbh-pprod-xen11' after snapshotMigration
[13:53 ovbh-pprod-xen11 ~]# thin_send /dev/linstor_group/pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000_s_test 2>/dev/null | ssh root@10.2.0.10 thin_recv linstor_group/pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000 2>/dev/nullNeed to yeet errors on both ends of command or it will fail.
Setup in linstor on new cluster
linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 resource-definition create pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 volume-definition create pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d 26851934208B --storage-pool xcp-sr-linstor_group_thin_device linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 resource create ovbh-pprod-xen01 pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8dAdd to k8s worker
linstor --controller 10.2.0.10 resource create ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker01 pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d --storage-pool DfltDisklessStorPoolCreate PV, ensure it is on the right worker/host
apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolume metadata: name: pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d annotations: pv.kubernetes.io/provisioned-by: linstor.csi.linbit.com finalizers: - external-provisioner.volume.kubernetes.io/finalizer - kubernetes.io/pv-protection - external-attacher/linstor-csi-linbit-com spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteOnce capacity: storage: 25Gi # Ensure this matches the actual size of the LINSTOR volume persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain storageClassName: linstor-replica-three # Adjust to the storage class you want to use volumeMode: Filesystem csi: driver: linstor.csi.linbit.com fsType: ext4 volumeHandle: pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d volumeAttributes: linstor.csi.linbit.com/mount-options: '' linstor.csi.linbit.com/post-mount-xfs-opts: '' linstor.csi.linbit.com/uses-volume-context: 'true' linstor.csi.linbit.com/remote-access-policy: | - fromSame: - xcp-ng/node nodeAffinity: required: nodeSelectorTerms: - matchExpressions: - key: xcp-ng/node operator: In values: - ovbh-pprod-xen01Create PVC
apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim metadata: annotations: pv.kubernetes.io/bind-completed: 'yes' pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: 'yes' volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-provisioner: linstor.csi.linbit.com volume.kubernetes.io/selected-node: ovbh-vtest-k8s01-worker01 volume.kubernetes.io/storage-provisioner: linstor.csi.linbit.com finalizers: - kubernetes.io/pvc-protection name: test-test namespace: default spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteOnce resources: requests: storage: 25Gi storageClassName: linstor-replica-one-local volumeMode: Filesystem volumeName: pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8dAnd it works!
-
The reason that it may be socat, is because the commands fail when I try using it, as instructed by https://github.com/LINBIT/thin-send-recv
[13:03 ovbh-pprod-xen11 ~]# thin_send linstor_group/pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000_s_test 2>/dev/null | zstd | socat STDIN TCP:10.2.0.10:4321 2024/10/28 13:04:59 socat[25701] E write(5, 0x55da36101da0, 8192): Broken pipe ... [13:03 ovbh-pprod-xen01 ~]# socat TCP-LISTEN:4321 STDOUT | zstd -d | thin_recv linstor_group/pvc-12aca72c-d94a-4c09-8102-0a6646906f8d_00000 2>/dev/null 2024/10/28 13:04:59 socat[27039] E read(1, 0x560ef6ff4350, 8192): Bad file descriptorAnd the same thing happens if I exclude
zstdfrom both commands. -
Hi!
I'm looking for new storage cluster for XCP-ng, because ceph RBD performance is very poor.
The main quetion now - is it possible to build XOSTOR (linstore) cluster separatly from xcp-ng and connect it over ethernet?
No inforamtion about such scenario in this article.
So I would like to have "compute" claster of xcp-ng nodes with fast local NVMe disks + and dedicated storage cluster with big amount of HDDs connected vie ethernet.And second question is about scaling.
How this storage cluster could be scaled? Is it possible to add storage nodes online without interrupting clients (VMs)?Thank you
-
LINSTOR can be reach in NFS or iSCSI if I remember correctly. You question is more for LINSTOR than for XCP-ng
-
@olivierlambert NFS and iSCSI have single point of failure. Yes, it is possible to deploy multipath iSCSI, but it is to complicated. I like CEPH RBD because it does not have single point of failure.
So I'm looking for something similar.From my point of vew XOSTOR is good idea, but in some cases there is no need to use all nodes as xcp-ng hosts. For example you do not need large amount of RAM and fast modern CPU for storage cluster nodes.
I think the best solution in my case will be to deploy XOSTOR controller in xcp-ng cluster connected to separate storage cluster.At first glance, I assume that it should be possible to connect storage cluster to xcp-ng with this command
linstor resource create node1 test1 --disklessSo the base idea is to use xcp-ng nodes for linstor-controllers/linstor-satellite and "storage" nodes as linstor-satellite only.
-
@splastunov / all.
Just on multipath iSCSI. I had this running for years with separate switches running the 'A side' and 'B side' multipath networks between the iSCSI dot hill's resilient and redundant controllers.
Once you have it configured, it is incredibly solid for what is a very budget solution. It just takes a bit of careful planning up front to make sure you wire up in a way that is properly resilient. Plus reliable monitoring to make sure that you notice when one of the resilient elements fails.
We had a number of switch power supply failures over the 10 year period that were completely transparent to the services running on the connected XCP-NG and XenServer hosts.
Similarly we were able to do a full DotHill controller replacement without any downtime after one of the two controllers failed.
We also replaced the hypervisor hardware a number of times over the lifetime of the platform.
-
@Mark-C Thank you!
Could you tell please how you scale your storage with iSCSI? What hardware/software are you using for storage? Is it possible to add storage nodes on fly or you have to deploy new storag cluster every time when you grow? -
@splastunov The DotHill certainly wasn't great for scaling out, because of the age of the firmware and the old-school treatment of the disk arrays.
We did deploy several disk expansion trays that were part populated at purchase as some level of expansion, and operated most of the array as a single underlying pool, which was then split up into iSCSI presented volumes.
So the limitations of the DotHill controllers and firmware we were using didn't address the storage pool scaling issue that CEPH / GPFS / etal are designed to.
However, some of the newer filer heads that treat their entire available disk array as a consolidated pool and support iSCSI would have that scalability, whilst keeping the hypervisor side relatively straight-forward.
CEPH etal are also in a much more mature place than they were back in the early 2010s too, so if I was doing it again, maybe we would go for a solution architecture based around that. Or XOSTOR, of course!
My intent was to present an iSCSI setup instance as something we found relatively bomb-proof, and post-initial configuration, relatively easy to scale. We provisioned 24 port A and B side network switches with jumbo frame support to give us the scalability to add further pools of hypervisors or storage, as required.
-
The typical hypervisor node was provisioned with at least 4 network ports, but most had 8 to allow trunking/resilience for every connection:
Management + live migration (Isolated)
World (Trunk)
iSCSI-A
iSCSI-BThe DotHills were 4 ports per controller, and the two controllers were configured as:
Management
iSCSI-A
iSCSI-B
SpareThe iSCSI-A and iSCSI-B were simple web-managed procurves with 24 ports each.
We had this scaled to 12 hypervisor nodes in 3 pools, all running off the same underlying dothill (dual redundant controller) hardware. We had provisioned some local SSD storage in each hypervisor for any nodes that were struggling for IOPs but ultimately never needed that.
