XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    264 Posts 43 Posters 176.6k Views 39 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • AnonabharA Offline
      Anonabhar
      last edited by Anonabhar

      The good news is that I eventually got 8.3 installed and it is looking good.. I had a few problems, but this was mostly down to something weird with the partition layout.

      Every time I installed 8.3 (fresh install) onto a machine, it would refuse to create any "Local Storage". I bounced around in circles many time and gave up, installing 8.2 (fresh install) and got the same result. What I had to do eventually is "ALT+Right Arrow" until I got to a # prompt, do a lvdisplay to find the VG and then do a lvremove on the VG + a wipefs -a -f /dev/sda3 to clear EVERYTHING out. It was somehow picking up that the drives I were using previously were used in a ZFS pool (btw.. This is really weird as these drives were used in a different machine, on a different RAID system, etc.. I have no idea how it figured out there was a ZFS pool, but whatever).

      Once I did the above, the fresh install worked just fine (8.2), joined it my my existing pool, promote it to a pool master and then do an upgrade to 8.3

      After the upgrade, local storage was showing offline for about 5 minutes, but then it magically kicked itsself into life. I am assuming it was doing something in the background as the new pool master.

      As a point of note, it looks like XCP-ng Center V20.11.0.3 is still compatiable as I am using that as well as XO to manage the pool with no issues (so far)

      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Anonabhar
        last edited by

        @Anonabhar said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

        As a point of note, it looks like XCP-ng Center V20.11.0.3 is still compatiable as I am using that as well as XO to manage the pool with no issues (so far)

        This looks suspicious. It should have complained about the version. Are you sure the upgrade went fine on all hosts?

        AnonabharA C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • AnonabharA Offline
          Anonabhar @stormi
          last edited by

          @stormi Yea.. I though it was weird as well, but I was happy to see it work.. Here is a screen shot of the XCP-ng screen.. I havent upgraded the Peg02 yet (as I have to get more disks in there tonight in order to migrate things around), but notice the version number on the Peg03

          74253b9d-d8f8-4013-a93a-82482b397c8f-image.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @psafont
            last edited by

            @psafont

            Yes the key is 1024:

            [11:45 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# openssl x509 -text -noout -in /etc/xensource/xapi-ssl.pem
            Certificate:
                Data:
                    Version: 3 (0x2)
                    Serial Number:
                        b2:32:6b:a9:eb:51:99:0c
                Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption
                    Issuer: CN=192.168.56.102
                    Validity
                        Not Before: May  4 15:23:19 2018 GMT
                        Not After : May  1 15:23:19 2028 GMT
                    Subject: CN=192.168.56.102
                    Subject Public Key Info:
                        Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption
                            Public-Key: (1024 bit)
                            Modulus:
                                00:c2:62:b4:fc:54:a0:1b:7c:5d:3e:61:4c:51:ef:
                                ff:a4:a0:da:ab:ea:49:f5:99:3e:14:67:a7:9d:68:
                                28:8e:ea:54:75:45:55:8b:78:fa:46:65:f5:f2:a2:
                                5e:ca:20:8c:c7:d4:4b:c4:21:a2:70:0e:49:d0:aa:
                                f0:2a:21:40:db:39:2f:57:ec:18:dc:82:2e:d0:b5:
                                f4:cb:48:a0:b8:9d:3f:c4:f5:75:cb:1b:1c:4b:47:
                                a2:07:2f:3c:b4:b1:37:d0:e8:11:e6:00:49:cf:89:
                                e6:4f:38:3d:a6:6f:bb:02:84:e8:17:3c:5b:a1:f7:
                                98:87:03:ad:36:26:31:ca:63
                            Exponent: 65537 (0x10001)
                    X509v3 extensions:
                        X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
                            DNS:xcp-ng-vm1, DNS:xcp-ng-vm1
                Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption
                     01:dc:44:77:3e:34:3a:b2:06:c5:bc:07:ab:e9:8c:c4:5e:cf:
                     c5:33:fc:74:83:cf:4c:14:cc:2f:fb:dc:d5:45:ff:84:76:40:
                     fc:b0:9c:00:af:a5:00:85:13:97:90:7e:66:81:36:3b:d3:83:
                     55:2c:e2:54:3d:85:d5:1d:d0:fe:1e:b7:2f:4d:76:8b:01:e1:
                     a5:be:ed:62:73:e0:44:65:74:6e:e3:eb:5b:72:21:66:7f:03:
                     28:c4:f7:d9:dc:72:46:d1:fc:b0:5f:18:bf:bd:ef:44:9c:64:
                     09:94:c8:65:1b:6b:06:26:ca:91:ee:ee:19:12:80:f0:f5:5f:
                     17:f4
            
            

            I found a slightly different command to reset the cert and it seems to work:

            [11:54 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# cat /etc/xensource-inventory | grep -i installation_uuid
            INSTALLATION_UUID='efe93b3d-ce2e-4f37-8a0d-00abf186c688'
            [11:54 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# xe host-refresh-server-certificate host uuid=efe93b3d-ce2e-4f37-8a0d-00abf186c688
            Error: No matching hosts found
            [11:55 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# xe host-list
            uuid ( RO)                : efe93b3d-ce2e-4f37-8a0d-00abf186c688
                      name-label ( RW): xcp-ng-vm1
                name-description ( RW): Default install
            
            
            [11:55 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# xe host-refresh-server-certificate host uuid='efe93b3d-ce2e-4f37-8a0d-00abf186c688'
            Error: No matching hosts found
            [11:55 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# xe host-emergency-reset-server-certificate
            [11:56 xcp-ng-vm1 xensource]# openssl x509 -text -noout -in /etc/xensource/xapi-ssl.pem
            Certificate:
                Data:
                    Version: 3 (0x2)
                    Serial Number: 1652293449990601601 (0x16ee20237764fb81)
                Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption
                    Issuer: CN=xcp-ng-vm1
                    Validity
                        Not Before: Nov 21 10:56:45 2022 GMT
                        Not After : Nov 18 10:56:45 2032 GMT
                    Subject: CN=xcp-ng-vm1
                    Subject Public Key Info:
                        Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption
                            Public-Key: (2048 bit)
                            Modulus:
                                00:a4:4d:a0:35:42:cc:1b:0c:0c:1e:5e:68:84:9e:
                                a0:66:5e:9d:d0:e1:8a:9c:00:d8:e1:d9:be:81:6e:
                                f4:88:dd:ee:e3:ba:cf:19:01:74:05:f6:be:f0:b2:
                                7b:36:3d:99:b1:b8:79:52:10:dc:71:db:5c:4c:cd:
                                03:cc:2d:49:e9:3f:ab:31:5b:f1:f6:8e:33:99:b0:
                                ed:ee:a6:f8:af:f7:46:25:db:fc:2f:05:da:16:de:
                                58:df:c8:70:75:17:1f:a8:d9:ed:d9:31:da:f5:5e:
                                ce:d3:93:d1:00:b4:e8:27:29:cb:a6:a8:e6:e1:97:
                                92:84:74:84:30:b2:09:fc:e4:60:79:6c:4b:f4:07:
                                e3:ba:e6:da:b0:be:6a:35:ef:d8:bc:47:df:58:45:
                                a0:c6:1a:56:ee:2e:32:1c:13:17:66:5c:41:93:1d:
                                da:e2:ac:03:31:16:6d:0c:33:f4:df:67:47:8b:bb:
                                53:6f:cd:12:aa:aa:af:12:25:77:38:20:d5:88:97:
                                cf:35:b7:e2:cb:28:60:15:a8:9a:8f:69:ce:a1:f1:
                                4a:de:bf:6a:9e:f6:4a:fc:a4:1e:07:1c:21:db:c0:
                                db:3c:fb:31:5c:cf:4a:95:05:ca:ef:d1:4e:6e:a1:
                                dd:6b:c8:e2:9c:f4:f3:05:2e:b5:a1:bc:78:54:29:
                                df:35
                            Exponent: 65537 (0x10001)
                    X509v3 extensions:
                        X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
                            DNS:xcp-ng-vm1, IP Address:192.168.220.106
                Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption
                     23:bb:bf:fb:78:5e:df:7a:00:15:1a:09:d6:9c:81:b3:ef:e2:
                     a3:a1:6c:18:5f:fe:dd:77:ae:99:48:92:d7:b6:76:c7:93:2f:
                     40:c3:43:a0:9f:ae:eb:b0:68:56:f0:65:04:29:49:01:b6:c7:
                     96:42:85:70:29:d0:cb:bc:21:26:55:5a:9e:af:97:4b:4a:19:
                     ad:5d:07:39:e3:e4:e5:6b:4b:2a:f3:7d:de:e5:8f:ea:3a:34:
                     0b:5e:6a:06:c4:34:d6:e8:5a:12:70:14:2f:95:12:66:da:79:
                     d0:10:43:e9:9d:75:68:e9:aa:56:ae:fe:49:2b:79:b9:f8:16:
                     be:7a:86:ff:b5:b4:84:14:cb:d1:91:ca:4d:95:36:91:43:1e:
                     1e:50:a6:70:93:77:1c:2e:bb:ee:5f:33:5e:c7:f2:98:2a:b4:
                     9d:40:a8:a8:ae:22:71:11:50:f4:62:ff:72:3f:9d:c6:0c:6a:
                     7e:34:c8:c1:f9:8f:5c:ac:fa:9b:bf:8b:e7:6b:92:9a:00:dc:
                     59:6d:15:23:af:28:c7:b5:b6:0a:a3:d5:98:86:9f:b2:31:1a:
                     29:16:ca:60:b2:a8:1e:68:b2:14:37:e6:f0:6c:cd:2b:43:d0:
                     18:6a:c0:43:70:ee:8b:c3:b2:fc:15:6c:a4:e7:c2:12:20:41:
                     ed:e6:23:60
            
            
            olivierlambertO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • C Offline
              cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
              last edited by cocoon

              @stormi That is my special build where I "fixed" the min version problem that now is in the other "official" client ^^

              was here back when the previous relase had no working client for some time 😉
              https://github.com/cocoon/xenadmin/releases

              AnonabharA stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @cocoon
                last edited by

                @cocoon Ah great news then!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AnonabharA Offline
                  Anonabhar @cocoon
                  last edited by

                  @cocoon Thank you for doing that!!!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @cocoon
                    last edited by stormi

                    @cocoon Ah, I thought you had pushed it to https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/ at that time.

                    EDIT: actually you did, but maybe your forked build was more permissive regarding the host version.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C Offline
                      cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
                      last edited by cocoon

                      @stormi I will add some details here:

                      https://github.com/cocoon/xenadmin/blob/ddc54106203a6030d6e45955937ea769c7441e67/XenAdmin/MainWindow.cs#L946

                      This was my "hardcoded" value, that is not intended to be used here.

                      Instead the official way is to extend some Enums with supported API Versions.
                      If the Version of the host (for 8.3 it is 2.20) is not found in the enums, it get's set to 99 = Unknown.

                      The current enum contain only up to 2.16 (API_2_16) so API_2_20 is not found --> set to 99:
                      https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/blob/development/XenModel/XenAPI/ApiVersion.cs#L38

                      Problem is here where it compares the min version to the current and if it is higher (and it is with 99) it refuses to connect.

                      https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/blob/development/XenAdmin/MainWindow.cs#L928

                      As I hardcoded it to a lower value (20) it is now lower and allows to connect.

                      And btw: my build was based on a slightly newer commit from Citrix than the one at xcp-ng repo.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • AnonabharA Offline
                        Anonabhar
                        last edited by Anonabhar

                        I was just wondering... Is it just my installation or is there no XenTools ISO in the dropdown for virtual disks?

                        EDIT: Never mind.. Its a XCP-ng Center thing.. I can mount the ISO from XO (it does not show up in XCP-ng Center in the dropdown list or even when it is mounted)..

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J Offline
                          jameso
                          last edited by

                          No offence to cocoon for doing great work with their release, but will v20.04.01 or variant be made available to support 8.3? 🙂

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • AnonabharA Offline
                            Anonabhar
                            last edited by

                            Oh! Is this a new feature in XCP-ng 8.3????

                            179a8ab7-7c29-4aab-b241-34e9ef54708a-image.png

                            If so... YEA!!!!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              It's a new feature added in SMAPIv1, creating XAPI tasks for the coalesce process 🙂 (done by Mark Syms at XenServer). I was VERY happy to saw that pull request 1y ago 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • C Offline
                                cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @jameso
                                last edited by

                                As I had now a chance to take a quick look, XO Light will be a great addition when it's ready 👍

                                Currently I cannot test the Console, but the Dashboard looks nice and of course I would have some ideas what would be great to have there, but you might already have a list.
                                But I would say for troubleshooting to extract logs and use the bugtool might be handy to have available.

                                I could not get any VM button to do anything, it simply might not be implemented right now, like poweron etc.

                                But I have seen at least one possible problems that you might want to add to a FAQ:
                                If you have ublock adblocker installed it seems to cause problems if you don't whitelist:

                                001-ublock.png

                                @jameso said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

                                No offence to cocoon for doing great work with their release, but will v20.04.01 or variant be made available to support 8.3? 🙂

                                Just my 2 cents:
                                I think chances are a bit better now, because it looks like both teams (XCP-NG and Citrix) are working more closely together now.
                                In the past I would have said that development goes much more in different directions and so new things would usually not be added to the client as nobody is really working on it.

                                But now it could happen maybe if release is near or ready. I would not expect it for alphas and betas, but mostly depends on if @borzel will find the time then.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  @cocoon VM actions are already planned (next step after the graphs, so maybe before 2023, but there's very little time now 😄 )

                                  About ublock, I don't remember having issues with it, but obviously, we'll test 🙂 (also, on the longer run, if the "online version" will fail to load, we'll fallback to an locally "older" installed version.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • C Offline
                                    cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by

                                    @olivierlambert
                                    In that Browser I have even more blockers like AdNauseam + uBlock + NoScript, but the problem can be the same, just to remember that Browsers might have blocking utils in it if there is a problem for someone.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      But that's weird that Adblockers will block our domain, which is harmless and without any spam 🤔 How could we explain it's "flagged"?

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C Offline
                                        cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        @olivierlambert
                                        I can't explain it, just had seen the error 🤔
                                        and here it seems to have happened, too:
                                        https://stackoverflow.com/a/62646075/19868457

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                          last edited by

                                          Might worth a contact to the plugin authors to put it in a authorized list (or avoid to put it in a block list)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • apzA Offline
                                            apz
                                            last edited by

                                            Is this release technically the point where XCP-ng starts to veer off more from the XS source as to my understanding they're already keeping some parts out of public repos nowdays?

                                            It'd be interesting to see newer Xen for example in the future and the SMAPIv3!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post