XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha ๐Ÿš€

    News
    41
    255
    15963
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO
      olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
      last edited by

      @cocoon VM actions are already planned (next step after the graphs, so maybe before 2023, but there's very little time now ๐Ÿ˜„ )

      About ublock, I don't remember having issues with it, but obviously, we'll test ๐Ÿ™‚ (also, on the longer run, if the "online version" will fail to load, we'll fallback to an locally "older" installed version.

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • C
        cocoon XCP-ng Center Team ๐Ÿš๏ธ @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert
        In that Browser I have even more blockers like AdNauseam + uBlock + NoScript, but the problem can be the same, just to remember that Browsers might have blocking utils in it if there is a problem for someone.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO
          olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
          last edited by

          But that's weird that Adblockers will block our domain, which is harmless and without any spam ๐Ÿค” How could we explain it's "flagged"?

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cocoon XCP-ng Center Team ๐Ÿš๏ธ @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert
            I can't explain it, just had seen the error ๐Ÿค”
            and here it seems to have happened, too:
            https://stackoverflow.com/a/62646075/19868457

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO
              olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
              last edited by

              Might worth a contact to the plugin authors to put it in a authorized list (or avoid to put it in a block list)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • apzA
                apz
                last edited by

                Is this release technically the point where XCP-ng starts to veer off more from the XS source as to my understanding they're already keeping some parts out of public repos nowdays?

                It'd be interesting to see newer Xen for example in the future and the SMAPIv3!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO
                  olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                  last edited by

                  We can't answer since it's not only on us. But on our side, we have more knowledge and more capabilities than previously to make our own moves. However, we want to keep our "upstream first" philosophy and convince XS to stay close to us. That's why we spend some times to get decent pull requests and some patience to get them merged ๐Ÿ™‚

                  We truly hope to share a common future where we wouldn't have to work twice on the same problems, but instead share our man power to be more efficient together. The rest is on XS team ๐Ÿ™‚

                  Also, as said before, in increasing order of complexity:

                  1. Get a more recent Xen version
                  2. Get a more recent Linux kernel version
                  3. Get a more recent platform (beyond CentOS 7)
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • AnonabharA
                    Anonabhar
                    last edited by

                    Hi Everyone,

                    I was wondering if this is a bug or if it is something specific to my setup. But.. I just noticed that a 'rescan' seems to be happening on my lab server every 30 seconds..

                    I noticed this because I was making a new template for XOCE and was deleting snapshots (viewing the /var/log/SMlog to wait until the coalescing was complete) and noticed that this was happening.

                    I will include the log file for viewing.. The log file is trimmed from 0730 -> present so it would fit in the posting limits.. But this was happening from the begging of the rotated logfile..

                    smlog.txt

                    ~Peg

                    ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO
                      olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                      last edited by

                      This is normal ๐Ÿ™‚ Adding @ronan-a in the loop to get a confirmation that SMAPIv1 is scanning every 30 secs.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ronan-aR
                        ronan-a Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€ @Anonabhar
                        last edited by

                        @Anonabhar Could you upload the other logs (xensource.log, daemon.log, etc)? There is no valid reason to have a call to cleanup.py (not a SR scan) every 30s if there is nothing to coalesce. ๐Ÿ™‚

                        AnonabharA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • AnonabharA
                          Anonabhar @ronan-a
                          last edited by

                          @ronan-a Sure.. I would be happy to... I just had to append a .txt to the end of the file in order to upload it.. Please remove .txt and decompress

                          logs2.tar.gz.txt

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            Fungusware
                            last edited by

                            So I read about the 'VM snapshot with disk exclusion' feature.

                            Is this supported at the XAPI level now? If so, how would one go about using it?

                            Regards

                            BenjiReisB olivierlambertO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • BenjiReisB
                              BenjiReis Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€ @Fungusware
                              last edited by

                              @Fungusware Hi!

                              Yes this feature is supported at XAPI level, the VM.snapshot method now has a ignore_vdis field which is a list of VDI ref to not include in the snapshot.
                              This also available through xe:

                              xe vm-snapshot vm=... ignore-vdi-uuids=uuid1,uuid2...
                              

                              Regards

                              F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • olivierlambertO
                                olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ @Fungusware
                                last edited by

                                @Fungusware Yes, @BenjiReis spent some time to make that contribution to XAPI upstream, see https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/pull/4563

                                benjamreis opened this pull request in xapi-project/xen-api

                                closed Add `ignore_vdis` to `VM.snapshot` method #4563

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO
                                  olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                  last edited by olivierlambert

                                  Note: this is already implemented in Xen Orchestra since a while ๐Ÿ™‚ (by default we try to ignore the [NOBAK] disk if XAPI is able to do it, which is now the case for 8.3)

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • F
                                    Fungusware @BenjiReis
                                    last edited by

                                    @BenjiReis Thanks for the info.

                                    I'll see if I can support into the SDK also, at least for .NET anyway.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • H
                                      hoerup
                                      last edited by

                                      What is current status? What is the rough expectation of next alpha/beta release

                                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambertO
                                        olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                        last edited by

                                        What kind of status are you expecting?

                                        AnonabharA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • F
                                          Fungusware @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          @olivierlambert Yes, I had been doing this also for quite some time. It was certainly one of the most requested features. It also felt a bit 'brute force' to me so would be nice to use it built in.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • AnonabharA
                                            Anonabhar @olivierlambert
                                            last edited by

                                            @olivierlambert Well.. I have been doing the occasional "yum update" with no new problems. Everything is working great, but I still have that re-scanning of the FS every 30 seconds.. Not impacting anything but just a little weird...

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post