New VM MAC address restriction
- 
 Hey  Thanks for your feedback, asking around  
- 
 That's the part we need to change: 
 https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/blob/master/ocaml%2Fxapi%2Fxapi_vif_helpers.ml#L209But I think using the Xen OUI by default ( 00:16:3e) could leak information on the hypervisor used So we need to make it configurable. A XAPI issue will come next week and we'll see how to work with it So we need to make it configurable. A XAPI issue will come next week and we'll see how to work with it 
- 
 Pinging @BenjiReis as a reminder so we can discuss this somewhere next week  
- 
 @olivierlambert Did anything ever come of this? 
- 
 It's doable but it's not yet on top priority list to our work on getting 8.3 released. But IIRC it's in our backlog, right @BenjiReis ? 
- 
 It's in the backlog indeed but I don't know when the ETA to start this. 
 I guess an issue in the xen-api repo would be a good first step to see what the XAPI team think of the feature.
- 
 I'm in the same boat -- this totally-random-MAC system is causing serious problems with my system inventory. Can we get this moved up on the priority list somehow? It seems like a pretty simple change. 
- 
 It is not a problem at all. You can always set MAC manually, or create VIF with certain MAC via XAPI or cli. Link to XAPI https://xapi-project.github.io/xen-api/classes/vif.html 
 check create method.Cli command 
 xe vif-create vm-uuid=<VM UUID> network-uuid=<NETWORK UUID> device=<ETHERNET INTERFACE NUMBER> mac=<MAC ADDRESS>
 Devicecould be in range 0-15
 MACin format XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XXAfter you need "activate" new VIF by command 
 xe vif-plug uuid=<VIF UUID>
 If VM does not runningxe-guest-toolsyou have to switch off VM and power it on again to activate new VIF.
- 
 @splastunov -- not a problem if you have the time and can train all your people (and have them remember each time) to do this manual workaround and independently select a unique MAC, which will require having a list they can easily check (and keep updated!) so they don't duplicate a MAC. On the other hand, every other virtualization platform I've used has either had a fixed OUI or a settable OUI, so I don't think this is ridiculous to ask for. 
- 
 @mdraugh sure. As workaround you can create simple table with MAC-IP-VM fields, and simple script to deploy new VM with first "free" MAC. Yes, it sounds like to develop your own XO, but I belive it should help alot. 
- 
 It's not ridiculous, but it's always things to manage in our backlog. I would love to do everything at once (even if we grow fast, the backlog is still larger than our workforce). At least, it's planned. 
- 
 FYI, Xen has a registered OUI: 00:16:3Eedit: I didn't read @olivierlambert previous post mentioning the OUI   
 Source: https://www.macvendorlookup.com 


