XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backup fails with "Body Timeout Error", "all targets have failed, step: writer.run()"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Backup
    42 Posts 18 Posters 5.3k Views 18 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • acebmxerA Offline
      acebmxer
      last edited by acebmxer

      Looking threw the backup logs at work and it seems i might be having a similar issue with only one of my pools and it does not happen all the time....

      Dates of errors... Each time if I restarted the tool stack for host 1 on the effected pool the follow run of the job would be successful until one day it fails again. Let me know if you would like for me to open a support tunel.
      7/30/26
      7/25/26
      7/24/26

       },
        "id": "1784976796895",
        "jobId": "42b76839-453e-4486-83e7-d736d8625ce5",
        "jobName": "Tilton Pool Backup",
        "message": "backup",
        "proxyId": "9d22fb88-8bdd-44d3-a3a3-9ff5401f95df",
        "scheduleId": "828b5e60-4302-455c-94f1-479a8001f955",
        "start": 1784976796895,
        "status": "failure",
        "tasks": [
          {
            "id": "0ms093lzi-tuc7iks1oqp",
            "start": 1784976800526,
            "status": "success",
            "tasks": [
              {
                "id": "0ms093lzj-fo91s5yb7xv",
                "start": 1784976800527,
                "status": "success",
                "end": 1784976800603,
                "message": "Starting XO metadata backup for the remote (3022703c-5029-4ac3-bda1-3a76c6634a39). (42b76839-453e-4486-83e7-d736d8625ce5)",
                "data": {
                  "id": "3022703c-5029-4ac3-bda1-3a76c6634a39",
                  "type": "remote"
                }
              }
            ],
            "end": 1784976800603,
            "message": "Starting XO metadata backup. (42b76839-453e-4486-83e7-d736d8625ce5)",
            "data": {
              "type": "xo"
            }
          },
          {
            "id": "0ms093lzn-gw1xvnk515",
            "start": 1784976800531,
            "status": "failure",
            "tasks": [
              {
                "id": "0ms093m09-e5tj4brl4hh",
                "start": 1784976800553,
                "status": "failure",
                "end": 1784977100916,
                "result": {
                  "name": "BodyTimeoutError",
                  "code": "UND_ERR_BODY_TIMEOUT",
                  "message": "Body Timeout Error",
                  "stack": "BodyTimeoutError: Body Timeout Error\n    at FastTimer.onParserTimeout [as _onTimeout] (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/@xen-orchestra/proxy/node_modules/undici/lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js:702:28)\n    at Timeout.onTick [as _onTimeout] (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/@xen-orchestra/proxy/node_modules/undici/lib/util/timers.js:162:13)\n    at listOnTimeout (node:internal/timers:585:17)\n    at process.processTimers (node:internal/timers:521:7)"
                },
                "message": "Starting metadata backup for the pool (64466023-8ef0-f5de-54ed-57e30eca644b) for the remote (3022703c-5029-4ac3-bda1-3a76c6634a39). (42b76839-453e-4486-83e7-d736d8625ce5)",
                "data": {
                  "id": "3022703c-5029-4ac3-bda1-3a76c6634a39",
                  "type": "remote",
                  "progress": 0
                }
              }
            ],
            "end": 1784977100917,
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • christopher-petzelC Offline
        christopher-petzel
        last edited by christopher-petzel

        @florent suggesting this looks like a network issue, I took a look at my XO's server's syslog and found the error when this occurs.

        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428083-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]: 2026-07-31T04:10:00.427Z xo:xo-server ERROR uncaught exception {
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428186-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:   error: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The expression evaluated to a falsy value:
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428262-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428309-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     assert(!this.paused)
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428341-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428391-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:       at Parser.finish (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607200851/node_modules/undici/lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js:302:5)
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428414-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:       at TLSSocket.<anonymous> (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607200851/node_modules/undici/lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js:741:32)
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428434-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:       at TLSSocket.emit (node:events:521:24)
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428478-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:       at TLSSocket.patchedEmit [as emit] (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607200851/@xen-orchestra/log/configure.js:52:17)
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428508-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:       at endReadableNT (node:internal/streams/readable:1729:12)
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428525-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:       at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428549-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     generatedMessage: true,
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428567-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428582-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     actual: false,
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428599-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     expected: true,
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428614-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     operator: '==',
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428628-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:     diff: 'simple'
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428642-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]:   }
        2026-07-31T00:10:00.428659-04:00 mis-26-svr xo-server[1298]: }
        

        So it looks like xo-server is dying, could it be the module undici that the problem here? Keep in mind that 13 other instances of xo-server performed the backup without a problem at the exact same time. Some days this never happens, some days it could be 4 instances of xo-server that die the same way in executing the backup.

        I think it's also important to note that the instance of xo-server dying happens immediately upon the backup being started at 10 minutes after midnight. I would think that if the problem were the network itself, that there would be some timeout period before causing the xo-server instance to crash.

        To answer a question asked of @jb , this is a local XCP-ng management network and there are no other backups occurring at 00:10.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        • First post
          Last post