XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    huge number of api call "sr.getAllUnhealthyVdiChainsLength" in tasks

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    28 Posts 8 Posters 4.2k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      On the VDI name, right?

      ryan.gravelR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ryan.gravelR Offline
        ryan.gravel @olivierlambert
        last edited by ryan.gravel

        @olivierlambert I believe so. It is the Disks tab of a VM. [NOBAK] was working but now the NAS is complaining about storage space. This VM has a disk on the NAS so it is backing it up twice. Added [NOSNAP] just as a test with the same result.
        24516021-d80c-4418-a539-a89b7ca17797-image.png

        It is running a full backup if that makes any difference.

        julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Online
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Ping @julien-f

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • julien-fJ Offline
            julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @ryan.gravel
            last edited by

            @ryan-gravel I cannot reproduce, both Full Backup and Incremental Backup correctly ignore VDIs with [NOBAK] in their name label.

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              Andrew Top contributor @julien-f
              last edited by

              @julien-f It's happening to me too... my [NOBAK] disk is being backed up now (commit 0e4a3) using the normal Backup (running a full).

              ryan.gravelR A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • ryan.gravelR Offline
                ryan.gravel @Andrew
                last edited by

                @Andrew @julien-f Ran a full backup with commit 96b76 and it is working properly now. Started thinking that I was the only one 🙂 Thanks a lot for everyone's help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  Andrew Top contributor @Andrew
                  last edited by

                  With today's update (feat: release 5.96.0, master 96b7673) things are working well again. I have not seen any Orphan VDI/snapshots or stuck Control Domain VDIs (but it may take time to test). Thanks to the Vates team!

                  julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • julien-fJ Offline
                    julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @Andrew
                    last edited by

                    Hello, can you please try the buffered-task-events branch and let me know if that solves the issue?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post