XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    huge number of api call "sr.getAllUnhealthyVdiChainsLength" in tasks

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    28 Posts 8 Posters 4.2k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      manilx @manilx
      last edited by

      @manilx Was fine for a short while only: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/9275/starting-getting-again-retry-the-vm-backup-due-to-an-error-error-vdi-must-be-free-or-attached-to-exactly-one-vm

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rvreugdeR Offline
        rvreugde
        last edited by rvreugde

        Same problem here 300+ sessions and counting
        07564582-c58a-490e-8921-5f5de0e98fa6-image.png
        XAPI restart did not solve the issue...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ryan.gravelR Offline
          ryan.gravel
          last edited by

          Doesn't seem to be respecting [NOBAK] anymore for storage repos. Tried '[NOSNAP][NOBAK] StorageName' and it still grabs it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            On the VDI name, right?

            ryan.gravelR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ryan.gravelR Offline
              ryan.gravel @olivierlambert
              last edited by ryan.gravel

              @olivierlambert I believe so. It is the Disks tab of a VM. [NOBAK] was working but now the NAS is complaining about storage space. This VM has a disk on the NAS so it is backing it up twice. Added [NOSNAP] just as a test with the same result.
              24516021-d80c-4418-a539-a89b7ca17797-image.png

              It is running a full backup if that makes any difference.

              julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Ping @julien-f

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • julien-fJ Offline
                  julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @ryan.gravel
                  last edited by

                  @ryan-gravel I cannot reproduce, both Full Backup and Incremental Backup correctly ignore VDIs with [NOBAK] in their name label.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Online
                    Andrew Top contributor @julien-f
                    last edited by

                    @julien-f It's happening to me too... my [NOBAK] disk is being backed up now (commit 0e4a3) using the normal Backup (running a full).

                    ryan.gravelR A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • ryan.gravelR Offline
                      ryan.gravel @Andrew
                      last edited by

                      @Andrew @julien-f Ran a full backup with commit 96b76 and it is working properly now. Started thinking that I was the only one 🙂 Thanks a lot for everyone's help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Online
                        Andrew Top contributor @Andrew
                        last edited by

                        With today's update (feat: release 5.96.0, master 96b7673) things are working well again. I have not seen any Orphan VDI/snapshots or stuck Control Domain VDIs (but it may take time to test). Thanks to the Vates team!

                        julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • julien-fJ Offline
                          julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @Andrew
                          last edited by

                          Hello, can you please try the buffered-task-events branch and let me know if that solves the issue?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post