XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CBT: the thread to centralize your feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    439 Posts 37 Posters 386.5k Views 29 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Online
      flakpyro @andyh
      last edited by flakpyro

      After a number of XOA Updates i decided to test CBT with snapshot delete again.

      Instead of " "can't create a stream from a metadata VDI, fall back to a base" i am seeing a more verbose error but the issue remains the same. In a 2 host pool with shared NFS storage if i have CBT with Snap delete enabled after a VM is migrated from host A to host B (remaining on the shared NFS SR) and a backup runs the delta backup fails and a full runs. This time the error shows " Can't do delta with this vdi, transfer will be a full"

      This is with XOA Latest: 5.100.0

      I have attached the backup log if this helps.

      2024-11-05T17_37_58.455Z - backup NG.json.txt

      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        rtjdamen @flakpyro
        last edited by

        @flakpyro in general this error means that the cbt is not valid, we have seen this as well and i know vates is looking into this. In general we saw this problem more on nfs then on iscsi, not shure if it is nfs related but maybe if u have access to an iscsi target try your results there.

        F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F Online
          flakpyro @rtjdamen
          last edited by

          @rtjdamen this test pool is running on TrueNAS, so i could configure iSCSI. Our production is on NFS so i tried to keep test close to the same as far as storage is concerned. We currently use NBD + CBT without the snapshot delete function in production and it works well via NFS. Will continue to keep testing as updates roll out and look forward to when this is completely stable. If there's anything anyone at Vates needs log or test wise i'm happy to help!

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R Offline
            rtjdamen @flakpyro
            last edited by

            @flakpyro i think that would be a good test, can u check how it is behaving on iscsi on your end?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              chr1st0ph9 @StormMaster
              last edited by

              @StormMaster Thank you - I experienced that too , 2 backup plans with same VMs. Backup failed once out of two with error message "can't create a stream from a metadata VDI, fall back to a base"

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                rtjdamen @chr1st0ph9
                last edited by

                @chr1st0ph9 i understand a fix is being made for this, @florent patched our proxy yesterday and since then no more fulls so far!

                F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F Online
                  flakpyro @rtjdamen
                  last edited by

                  @rtjdamen Thats great news, with both block and file based SRs?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • florentF Offline
                    florent Vates 🪐 XO Team
                    last edited by florent

                    this branch ( already deployed on @rtjdamen systems) add a better handing of host that took too much time to compute the changed block list :
                    https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/8120

                    it will be release in patch this week

                    I am still investigating an error that still occurs occasionally : XapiError: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_460(, Failed to calculate changed blocks for given VDIs. [opterr=Source and target VDI are unrelated], )

                    fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                    closed fix(@xen-orchestra/xapi): use callAsync for VDI_listChangedBlocks #8120

                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      rtjdamen @florent
                      last edited by

                      @florent thanks for letting me know, on our end this error seems to occur on the same vms every time, it are just a handfull. Could it be these vms are facing higher load on them what causes xapi tasks to take longer then expected?

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F Online
                        flakpyro @rtjdamen
                        last edited by flakpyro

                        @rtjdamen @florent Be very curious to test this once it hits XOA.

                        The lab i am testing this a two host pool with each server having a 24 Core Epyc CPU and 256 GB of ram. There are only around 4 VMs running on this test environment currently and all are low load VMs.

                        Is it still something that mostly occurs with file based SRs? I never did get a chance to setup ISCSI and test with it instead of NFS.

                        Once this becomes stable there i definitely plan to switch to this backup method in production!

                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R Offline
                          rtjdamen @flakpyro
                          last edited by

                          @flakpyro no on my end there is no difference for nfs or iscsi on XOA backups, we only had this issue with Alike Backup, my assumption was this would be the case in XOA as well, but not at this time.

                          What i found out is that one of my vms facing this issue has 2 disks, both on a different SR, i am moving one of the disks to the same SR and check tomorrow (tonight will be a full after migrating) if this is still the case there.

                          The other vm we face this issue on is has both disks on the same SR so that cannot be the case there. keep u posted on the results.

                          florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • florentF Offline
                            florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @rtjdamen
                            last edited by florent

                            @rtjdamen we found a clue with @Bastien-Nollet : there was a race condition between the timeframe allowed to enable CBT and the snapshot, leading to a snapshot taken before CBT , thus failing to compute correctly the list of changed block at the next backup

                            The fix is deployed, and we'll see this night. If everything goes well, this night will be a full, but the disks will keep CBT enabled. And the next night, we'll have delta

                            if everything is ok, it will be released in a second patch ( 5.100.2 )

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • R Offline
                              rtjdamen @florent
                              last edited by

                              @florent sounds like a plan! i will keep an eye on them and let u know the results!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B Offline
                                barwys
                                last edited by

                                Hi,
                                I observed one issue with the backup process when the CBT is enabled. The case is showing when the VM has two disks on different SRs. When the backup tries to be taken, it fails, and the machine goes to a state where no other changes/reconfiguration is possible. It is not possible to disable CBT, move a disk to a different SR or create another backup. Sometimes after a failed backup the console access and machine are freezing. Everything works fine when all of the VM disks are on one SR.

                                The logs from the first backup:
                                SCR-20241113-jypa.png

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi @barwys

                                  Can you provide more details? We need to know on which commit or XOA version you are 🙂

                                  B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B Offline
                                    barwys @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by

                                    @olivierlambert Xen Orchestra, commit 804af
                                    Both SRs are the shared storage by Fibre Channels connection (multipathing enabled). I tested on the Windows or Linux guest system as well. XenTools respectively 9.4.0/9.3.3 and 8.4.0-1 respectively.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      This commit is already a week old, please update to the latest one, rebuild and try again

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B Offline
                                        barwys @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        Hello @olivierlambert,
                                        After upgrading to commit 05c4e, I cannot reproduce this issue again. It seems to work much better.
                                        Thanks

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                          last edited by

                                          Great! Please remember to always be on latest commit before reporting a problem, as you can see the code base is evolving fast 😉

                                          F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • F Online
                                            flakpyro @olivierlambert
                                            last edited by

                                            @olivierlambert Unfortunately after updating to 5.100.2 (XOA and Proxies) i am still running into XOA backups falling back to full after preforming a VM migration between two hosts within a pool when snapshot deletion is enabled. This doesnt happen if the snapshot is retained.

                                            My test setup:
                                            Servers: 2 x HP DL325 Gen 10 AMD Epyc Servers
                                            Storage: TrueNAS Mini R running TrueNAS Scale 24.10 serving an NFS SR shared between both servers.
                                            All VMs running on the same shared SR on the TrueNAS.

                                            Scenario:
                                            VM 1 Migrated from Host A to Host B
                                            VM 2 Migrated from Host B to Host A

                                            Running a CBT with Snapshot delete backup after migration the VM between hosts while they remain on the same shared SR results in the error:

                                            "Can't do delta with this vdi, transfer will be a full"
                                            "Can't do delta, will try to get a full stream"

                                            Full log and screenshot of the error:
                                            2024-11-14T19_20_40.383Z - backup NG.json.txt

                                            Screenshot_20241114_132811.png

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post