I believe this issue was resolved when the health check system was changed to detect network connectivity at startup so it did not need to wait for then entire VM to boot. Needs the Xen tools to be installed. I have not had an issue since this change.
Best posts made by McHenry
-
RE: Backup Issue: "timeout reached while waiting for OpaqueRef"
-
RE: Large incremental backups
The server had high memory usage so I expect lots of paging, which could explain the block writes. I've increased the mem and want to see what difference that makes.
-
RE: Disaster Recovery hardware compatibility
Results are in...
Four VMs migrated. Three using warm migration and all worked. 4th used straight migration and BSOD but worked after a reboot.
-
RE: ZFS for a backup server
Thanks Oliver. We have used GFS with Veeam previously and will be a great addition.
-
RE: Alarms in XO
This host does not run any VMs, just used for CR
I've increased the dom0 ram to 4GB with no more alarms.
-
RE: Windows11 VMs failing to boot
Thank you so much. If you want me I'll be at the pub.
-
RE: Zabbix on xcp-ng
We have successfully installed using:
rpm -Uvh https://repo.zabbix.com/zabbix/7.0/rhel/7/x86_64/zabbix-release-latest.el7.noarch.rpm yum install zabbix-agent2 zabbix-agent2-plugin-* --enablerepo=base,updates
-
RE: Migrating a single host to an existing pool
Worked perfectly. Thanks guys.
-
RE: from Hyper-V
Our Hyper-V servers have no GUI and the process I use is:
- RDP to the Hyper-V host
- Open PowerShell
- Get a list of the VMs on the host
Get-VM
- Stop the VM
STOP-VM -Name <name of VM>
- Identify the VM's disk(s) for conversion
Get-VMHardDiskDrive -VMName <name of VM>
- Convert the VHDX to VHD (destination file extension sets the type so use ".vhd")
Convert-VHD -Path <source path> -DestinationPath <destination path> -VHDType Dynamic
To transfer the newly created .vhd files to xcp-ng we use Putty via the cli
Latest posts made by McHenry
-
RE: VM association with shared storage
To automatically update the hosts? I expect, to work, a host reboot would be required however how can this be automated if the host has running VMs?
-
RE: Alarms in XO
This host does not run any VMs, just used for CR
I've increased the dom0 ram to 4GB with no more alarms.
-
Alarms in XO
When I check "Health" in XO everything appears fine but I do see a number of Alarms, problems is I have no idea what they mean. I do not think I have any system performance issues but am sure these should not be ignored.
HST150 is a host for disaster recovery using CR
-
RE: VM association with shared storage
Why did I not do this sooner
-
VM association with shared storage
I have recently changed our setup to use FreeNAS shared storage for VMs. Now I have shared storage and two hosts I can move running VMs between hosts. This makes it easy to patch & restart a host by moving the VMs off it first.
As opposed to moving the VMs, I could schedule a maint windows and down the VMs then patch and reboot the host. In this scenario, if the host was to fail I expect nothing will be lost as the shared storage is independent. Then I can simple start the VMs on the remaining host, meaning there is no hard link between the host and VM.
Does this sound correct?
-
RE: Backup Issue: "timeout reached while waiting for OpaqueRef"
I believe this issue was resolved when the health check system was changed to detect network connectivity at startup so it did not need to wait for then entire VM to boot. Needs the Xen tools to be installed. I have not had an issue since this change.
-
VM resource usage
I have a host with 48 CPUs and 96GB RAM
I understand that the RAM cannot be over allocated to VMs or I get the no hosts available message a startup however I understand CPUs can, so I could allocate all VMs 48 CPUs and they will only utilise what they require. Is this correct and if so is there any reason not to allocate the max CPUs to a VM.
Further to this, if I only allocate the VMs a smaller number of CPUs do they all overlap on the first X CPUs and leave the others unused. i.e. if VM1 has 8 then it will only use the 1st 8 and if VM2 has 4 then it will only use the first 4.
I ask as I currently have multiple VMs using a lesser number of CPUs than the host has however the status only show the first 15 CPUs in use on the host:
-
RE: Best strategy for Continuous Replication
Here's the new model. We've tried a few combinations and I think with TrueNAS shared storage this will now work well.
-
RE: Best strategy for Continuous Replication
For anyone else looking to connect TrueNAS with XCP-NG
-
RE: Best strategy for Continuous Replication
In TrueNAS NFS share settings I set this and it now works.