XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. sluflyer06
    S
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 13
    • Posts 83
    • Groups 0

    sluflyer06

    @sluflyer06

    14
    Reputation
    17
    Profile views
    83
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    sluflyer06 Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by sluflyer06

    • Is v6 preview not available on XO from source?

      just updated XO (source) to 4cf03, wanted to check out v6, but when i enter http://10.10.10.42/v6 (usually use RP but wasn't sure if that was a problem so entered IP directly)

      I just get a 'Cannot GET /v6'

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Veeam and XCP-ng

      Before migrating to XCP-NG I was a VMWare user with Veeam as my backup solution, it works but it's 3rd party and somewhat bloated. I think one of the big things xcp-ng has to offer is the native backup. I honestly wouldn't even consider Veeam unless there is some niche use for it that native can't do.

      posted in XCP-ng
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Can't pass multiple PCI devices

      Thank you, low on sleep and of course you were right...

      posted in Hardware
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Threadripper TRX50 7960x....yaay/nay?

      @planedrop thank you for the input.

      posted in Hardware
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Is v6 preview not available on XO from source?

      @Gaiking Wow, a little harsh don't you think? If you've been around XCP-NG/XO for any length of time at all you'd know development actually happens at a pretty miraculous pace.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Is v6 preview not available on XO from source?

      @olivierlambert ah ok, cool, just tried it in XOA and voila. Have a nice weekend.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Just performed server update and stats page is blank in XO now.

      @olivierlambert oh cool, i did poke around the xo forum but not the 8.3 thread, awesome no problem then, thanks!

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Want to compare insecure_nbd but doesn't seem to work (secure does)

      @olivierlambert I'm willing to dig in and provide any data. right now it's 10 VM's all with 1 disk each, i'm currently running a backup without NBD using my flash array as a NFS destination, it's a handful of fast samsung SAS 12 SSD's that are striped (they're 3.2TB each). When that finishes I'll flip NBD back up and re-run so at least I think that will take storage out of the equation I believe.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Cannot export OVAs

      @Andrew Exporting all my large VM's worked on that branch.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Backup jobs started to fail after last XOA update

      @Forza Wow, I just tried that out and backup speed increased by 48%.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06

    Latest posts made by sluflyer06

    • RE: Is supermicro IPMI data display planned?
      [{"name": "CPU Temp", "value": "39 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "System Temp", "value": "31 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "Peripheral Temp", "value": "46 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "NIC Temp", "value": "59 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_VRM0 Temp", "value": "43 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_VRM1 Temp", "value": "34 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "SOC_VRM Temp", "value": "44 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "VDDIO_VRM Temp", "value": "48 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "DIMMA~C Temp", "value": "45 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "DIMME~G Temp", "value": "44 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 12V", "value": "12.08 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 5VCC", "value": "5.10 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 3.3VCC", "value": "3.35 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "VBAT", "value": "0x04", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 5VSB", "value": "5.06 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 3.3VSB", "value": "3.39 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 1.8VSB", "value": "1.84 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 2.5V", "value": "2.47 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 1.8V", "value": "1.77 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 1.2V", "value": "1.19 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 1.0V", "value": "0.99 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 3.3VSB", "value": "3.28 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_SOC", "value": "1.22 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_VDDIO", "value": "1.12 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN1", "value": "2100 RPM", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN2", "value": "1960 RPM", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN3", "value": "2100 RPM", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN4", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "FANA", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "FANB", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "FANC", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "M2_SSD1 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "M2_SSD2 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "Chassis Intru", "value": "0x00", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "NVMe_SSD1 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "NVMe_SSD2 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "GPU4 Temp", "value": "49 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "GPU6 Temp", "value": "34 degrees C", "event": "ok"}]
      
      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Is supermicro IPMI data display planned?

      @olivierlambert

      computed "cpuHighestTemp" thrown TypeError: r.forEach is not a function
          cpuHighestTemp tab-general.js:45
          get factory.js:219
          o factory.js:112
          get factory.js:50
          default tab-general.js:80
          React 36
          _unsubscribes add-subscriptions.js:35
          p index.js:269
          Lodash 4
          p index.js:264
      
      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Is supermicro IPMI data display planned?

      Screenshot 2025-11-01 at 9.47.20 PM.png

      Weird it is not showing CPU temperatures, that was shown in the test command. (H13SRA-TF super micro board)

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Is supermicro IPMI data display planned?
      [{"name": "CPU Temp", "value": "37 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "System Temp", "value": "30 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "Peripheral Temp", "value": "46 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "NIC Temp", "value": "59 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_VRM0 Temp", "value": "43 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_VRM1 Temp", "value": "34 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "SOC_VRM Temp", "value": "44 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "VDDIO_VRM Temp", "value": "48 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "DIMMA~C Temp", "value": "45 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "DIMME~G Temp", "value": "44 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 12V", "value": "12.08 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 5VCC", "value": "5.10 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 3.3VCC", "value": "3.35 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "VBAT", "value": "0x04", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 5VSB", "value": "5.06 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 3.3VSB", "value": "3.39 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "MB 1.8VSB", "value": "1.84 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 2.5V", "value": "2.47 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 1.8V", "value": "1.77 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 1.2V", "value": "1.19 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 1.0V", "value": "0.99 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "BMC 3.3VSB", "value": "3.28 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_SOC", "value": "1.22 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "CPU_VDDIO", "value": "1.12 Volts", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN1", "value": "1960 RPM", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN2", "value": "1960 RPM", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN3", "value": "1960 RPM", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "FAN4", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "FANA", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "FANB", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "FANC", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "M2_SSD1 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "M2_SSD2 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "Chassis Intru", "value": "0x00", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "NVMe_SSD1 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "NVMe_SSD2 Temp", "value": "no reading", "event": "ns"}, {"name": "GPU4 Temp", "value": "51 degrees C", "event": "ok"}, {"name": "GPU6 Temp", "value": "35 degrees C", "event": "ok"}]
      
      

      This is on a H13SRA-TF board.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Is supermicro IPMI data display planned?

      I'm def willing to test and provide feedback from mine. I have a newer threadripper SM build I can test with. (H13 board)

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • Is supermicro IPMI data display planned?

      Reading the email today about what's in new release of XO with the added Lenovo support being the 3rd vendor now supported. Is SuperMicro planned for the same type of support?

      Thanks and great update, as always.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Intel ARC 310 Problem

      @chicagomed there's no need to be editing grub for pass thru, I would use the standard commands and avoid corrupting grub in the process.

      posted in Hardware
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Epyc VM to VM networking slow

      @manilx is your nas virtualized on the host, or a separate physical box?

      posted in Compute
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Epyc VM to VM networking slow

      @Seneram ah well excuse my ignorance then, I thought people said the limits were much lower. I can see what you are saying and the big issue with that.

      posted in Compute
      S
      sluflyer06
    • RE: Epyc VM to VM networking slow

      Here's a little test I just ran between VM's over SMB on my Threadripper 7960x build on a Supermicro H13SRA-TF motherboard, def not too bad, these VM's are on different SR's.
      dada79bd-02ac-4045-81a8-ab424d9d320f-image.png

      posted in Compute
      S
      sluflyer06