XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. dthenot
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 62
    • Groups 4

    dthenot

    @dthenot

    Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
    108
    Reputation
    79
    Profile views
    62
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    dthenot Unfollow Follow
    Storage Team Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Admin

    Best posts made by dthenot

    • RE: New XCP-ng developers

      Hello,

      I'm a new developer on XCP-ng, I'll work on the Xen side to improve performance.
      I'm a newly graduated of University of Versailles Saint-Quentin with a specialty in parallel computing and HPC, I have a big interest in operating systems.

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • LargeBlockSR for 4KiB blocksize disks

      Hello,

      As some of you may know, there is currently a problem with disks with blocksize of 4KiB not being compatible to be a SR disk.
      It is an error with the vhd-util utilities that is not easily fixed.
      As such, we quickly developed a SMAPI driver using losetup ability to emulate another sector size to be able to workaround the problem for the moment.

      The real solution will involve SMAPIv3, which the first driver is available to test: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2024/04/19/first-smapiv3-driver-is-available-in-preview/

      To go back to the LargeBlock driver, it is available in 8.3 in sm 3.0.12-12.2.

      To set it up, it is as simple as creating a EXT SR with xe CLI but with type=largeblock.

      xe sr-create host-uuid=<host UUID> type=largeblock name-label="LargeBlock SR" device-config:device=/dev/nvme0n1
      

      It does not support using multiple devices because of quirks with LVM and the EXT SR driver.

      It automatically creates a loop device with a sector size of 512b on top of the 4KiB device and then creates a EXT SR on top of this emulated device.

      This driver is a workaround, we have automated tests but they can't catch all things.
      If you have any feedbacks or problems, don't hesitate to share here 🙂

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @ph7 It's only enabled for the two yum command with the --enablerepo explicitly used.
      It's disabled in the config otherwise.
      No need to do anything 🙂

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XOSTOR hyperconvergence preview

      @gb.123 Hello,
      The instruction in the first post are still the way to go 🙂

      posted in XOSTOR
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: Attach a Physical HD to a VM?

      @nasheayahu Hello,

      I do this in my homelab with a disk since I imported it from a physical machine:

      mkdir /srv/NAS
      xe sr-create type=udev device-config:location=/srv/NAS name-label="NAS Disks" host-uuid=<UUID of the host with the disks>
      

      Then you make a symlink to the device:

      ln -s /dev/sda /srv/NAS/sda #although it might be better to use a stable identifier if you have multiple disks
      xe sr-scan uuid=<UUID of the udev SR>
      

      The disk will appear as a VDI in the SR that you can then plug to a VM.

      I also renamed the VDI [NOSNAP][NOBAK] NAS Drive
      [NOSNAP][NOBAK] instruct XO to not snapshot and export the disk in backups (since it can't).

      It's not passthrough, as in the disk is not directly given to the VM, but tapdisk (the process virtualizing storage) will give access to the whole disk to the guest, so it can mount any FS on it.

      The udevSR is usually used for plugging USB from what I could gather from existing code. But users in homelabs have been using it like this for a while.
      Though you will likely not have native performance level since it's not exactly passthrough.

      posted in Management
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @Andrew Hello,

      I have been able to find the problem and make a fix, it's in the process of being packaged.
      I can confirm it only happen for file based SR when using purge snapshots.
      For some reason, the vdi type of CBT_metadata is cbtlog for FileSR but stays the image format it was for LVMSR
      And it would make a condition fail during the list_changed_blocks call.

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: Possible to reconnect SR automatically?

      @manilx Hi,

      yum install plug-late-sr
      

      Should do the trick to install it 🙂

      posted in Development
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: Unable to add new node to pool using XOSTOR

      @olivierlambert In 8.2 yes, linstor sm version is separated, it's not the case in 8.3 anymore.

      posted in XOSTOR
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XOSTOR appears to be broken on the new XCP-NG May 2026 update

      @ccooke Hello,

      We have a fix, we are aiming to validate it rapidly so it shouldn't happen for others.
      Thank you for reporting the issue. I'll update the thread again when the update is available and it should be safe for other people going through here to update using the RPU.

      posted in XOSTOR
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: CBT: the thread to centralize your feedback

      @olivierlambert I am 🙂

      posted in Backup
      dthenotD
      dthenot

    Latest posts made by dthenot

    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @probain Hello,

      It's likely linked to the List index out of range bug.
      That bug was linked to the SR scan failing to introduce CBT_metatadata VDI in the XAPI database, could you try to launch a xe sr-scan uuid=<SR UUID> and try again to disable CBT?
      If it does not work, could you share the /var/log/SMlog of around the time you are trying to disable CBT?

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @Andrew Hello,

      I'm also getting error on some VMs while trying to export a disk and also trying to even start some VMs from NFS (that were fine before).

      Is it still a problem? It might have multiple causes. If it's still an issue, could you share the logs: /var/log/{SMlog,xensource.log,daemon.log}. It contains information that could help us investigate.

      The VDI not detached cleanly means that the VDI still has a reference to the host it was running on before.
      It's might be caused by the xenopsd error earlier or maybe it's the cause.

      If you are sure no tapdisk are using the VDI, you can look at tap-ctl list output on each host.
      You can clean this reference with the script in /opt/xensource/sm/resetvdis.py single <VDI UUID>.

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: Attach a Physical HD to a VM?

      @nasheayahu Sorry, I made a mistake, it's device-config:location --'
      I'll edit my first post with the correct configuration, you will also likely need to give the host-uuid of the host the disk is on.

      posted in Management
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: Attach a Physical HD to a VM?

      @nasheayahu Hello,

      I do this in my homelab with a disk since I imported it from a physical machine:

      mkdir /srv/NAS
      xe sr-create type=udev device-config:location=/srv/NAS name-label="NAS Disks" host-uuid=<UUID of the host with the disks>
      

      Then you make a symlink to the device:

      ln -s /dev/sda /srv/NAS/sda #although it might be better to use a stable identifier if you have multiple disks
      xe sr-scan uuid=<UUID of the udev SR>
      

      The disk will appear as a VDI in the SR that you can then plug to a VM.

      I also renamed the VDI [NOSNAP][NOBAK] NAS Drive
      [NOSNAP][NOBAK] instruct XO to not snapshot and export the disk in backups (since it can't).

      It's not passthrough, as in the disk is not directly given to the VM, but tapdisk (the process virtualizing storage) will give access to the whole disk to the guest, so it can mount any FS on it.

      The udevSR is usually used for plugging USB from what I could gather from existing code. But users in homelabs have been using it like this for a while.
      Though you will likely not have native performance level since it's not exactly passthrough.

      posted in Management
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XOSTOR appears to be broken on the new XCP-NG May 2026 update

      Hello again,

      The updates have been made available and RPU with xostor should be safe to run 🙂
      https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/05/07/may-2026-updates-2-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

      posted in XOSTOR
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XOSTOR appears to be broken on the new XCP-NG May 2026 update

      @ccooke Hello,

      We have a fix, we are aiming to validate it rapidly so it shouldn't happen for others.
      Thank you for reporting the issue. I'll update the thread again when the update is available and it should be safe for other people going through here to update using the RPU.

      posted in XOSTOR
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XOSTOR appears to be broken on the new XCP-NG May 2026 update

      @ccooke Hello,

      You should be able to make the XOSTOR SR work again if you update sm and sm-fairlock on the other hosts.

      yum update sm sm-fairlock
      

      Then you should be able to re-plug the SR on the master and proceed with the RPU.

      posted in XOSTOR
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @IgorGlock Hello,

      Could you share the exception that should be in /var/log/SMlog?

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @Andrew Hello,

      I have been able to find the problem and make a fix, it's in the process of being packaged.
      I can confirm it only happen for file based SR when using purge snapshots.
      For some reason, the vdi type of CBT_metadata is cbtlog for FileSR but stays the image format it was for LVMSR
      And it would make a condition fail during the list_changed_blocks call.

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @Andrew Hello Andrew,

      Thank you for reporting.
      It appear that the CBT on FileSR-based SR is not working in addition to data-destroy (the option that allow to remove the VDI content and only keep the CBT).
      Can you confirm that you are using a FileSR (ext or nfs)?
      Is it possible to disable purge data on the CR job?

      posted in News
      dthenotD
      dthenot