I powered on my spare test "server" and ran this update.
All went fine.
After the reboot I started the fully updated XOA (local installed) and ran it for a few minutes.
then I shut it down but it sat for a few minutes so I did a force shut down from xsconsole.
Rebooted the host again and started the XOA, shut it down and it worked fine
Tested one more time and it went OK.
Best posts made by ph7
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀
Upgrade to RC2 worked fine so far with netinstall ISO in ventoy on a 8 gen i5 HP laptop. And a "full" ISO on its own USB on a Lenovo Thinkcentre Ryzen 5 2400GE
-
RE: Performance-Plugin is showing the wrong SR on resolution
@olivierlambert
I have reported a similar issue with the cpu report:
Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/9658/lots-of-performance-alerts-after-upgrading-xo-to-commit-aa490/14#
-
RE: Disk exclusion from backup
yes there is, in the docs
https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/backups#exclude-disks -
RE: Need some advice on retention
I have a similar backup strategy
One backup job with 2 schedules
Works fine for me -
RE: How to Migrate VMs Seamlessly in Xen Orchestra ??
@danieeljosee
Take a look at Tom Lawrence YT channel
Lots of good stuff there
https://www.youtube.com/@LAWRENCESYSTEMS -
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀
@ph7 said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback :
Upgrade to RC2 worked fine so far with netinstall ISO in ventoy on a 8 gen i5 HP laptop. And a "full" ISO on its own USB on a Lenovo Thinkcentre Ryzen 5 2400GE
2 days ago I upgraded my fully patched Ryzen 5 RC1 to RC2 by ISO.
Unfortunately I also upgraded my XO to commit aa490.
All backup jobs since then has triggered CPU performance alerts on my backed up delta, offline VM, XCP-ng host and the VM running XO.
I will update the XO to latest commit today.
Are there any changes in RC2 that could cause this?
I have only received 1 alert on high memory earlier. -
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀
@stormi
I ran yum update a few minutes ago and got this:
warning: %triggerin(sm-3.2.3-1.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Non-fatal <unknown> scriptlet failure in rpm package sm-3.2.3-1.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
The server started and the VMs seems to be running.
I'm not running iSCSI so i hope its OK
Latest posts made by ph7
-
RE: Backup Retention vs Long-Term Backup Retention
@DustinB
Backup / Restore / trashcan -
RE: Backup Retention vs Long-Term Backup Retention
@DustinB
The schedule I am testing is hourly with a pause when the other jobs are runningIn the setup the
Long-term retention of backups
like this:And this is the result so far:
We are getting closer to the weekly now.
Cant wait -
RE: Backup Retention vs Long-Term Backup Retention
@DustinB
I think You only need the Backuo retension = 7 inside the schedule.
I think You can delete (disable for now) the other 2
The long term retention will fix the weeks and month.
maybe remove the 7Number of daily backups kept
I am running a test job and I will post some info in a "minute" -
RE: Disk exclusion from backup
yes there is, in the docs
https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/backups#exclude-disks -
RE: Long-term retention of backups
@olivierlambert said in Long-term retention of backups:
@ph7 said in Long-term retention of backups:
VM_LACKS_FEATURE
This means there's no tools installed or working on that VM
The original job is still not running
I was thinking about this and came up with this cunning plan- Shut down the VM to see if there is still a problem with the tools
- Run the original job manually
No. it did not work, still failing
entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52
{ "data": { "mode": "delta", "reportWhen": "failure", "backupReportTpl": "mjml" }, "id": "1735908223694", "jobId": "6a12854b-cc07-4269-b780-fe87df6cd867", "jobName": "LongTerm-5+2", "message": "backup", "scheduleId": "4f8cc819-2cf7-42ac-94ae-ee005727ecf7", "start": 1735908223694, "status": "failure", "infos": [ { "data": { "vms": [ "1b75faf0-f4db-5aa9-d204-9bee6f2abfd6" ] }, "message": "vms" } ], "tasks": [ { "data": { "type": "VM", "id": "1b75faf0-f4db-5aa9-d204-9bee6f2abfd6", "name_label": "Debian" }, "id": "1735908225556", "message": "backup VM", "start": 1735908225556, "status": "failure", "tasks": [ { "id": "1735908225574", "message": "clean-vm", "start": 1735908225574, "status": "success", "end": 1735908225783, "result": { "merge": false } }, { "id": "1735908225605", "message": "clean-vm", "start": 1735908225605, "status": "success", "end": 1735908225828, "result": { "merge": false } }, { "id": "1735908226496", "message": "snapshot", "start": 1735908226496, "status": "success", "end": 1735908231603, "result": "4cf9de45-ff3f-f1a1-8a86-7b5cb03c9dd5" }, { "data": { "id": "446f82eb-2794-4c01-bd71-e247abd6a39c", "isFull": true, "type": "remote" }, "id": "1735908231603:0", "message": "export", "start": 1735908231603, "status": "failure", "end": 1735908231670, "result": { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } }, { "data": { "id": "0927f4dc-4476-4ac3-959a-bc37e85956df", "isFull": true, "type": "remote" }, "id": "1735908231605", "message": "export", "start": 1735908231605, "status": "failure", "end": 1735908231657, "result": { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } }, { "id": "1735908232625", "message": "clean-vm", "start": 1735908232625, "status": "success", "end": 1735908232700, "result": { "merge": false } }, { "id": "1735908232656", "message": "clean-vm", "start": 1735908232656, "status": "success", "end": 1735908232767, "result": { "merge": false } }, { "id": "1735908232981", "message": "snapshot", "start": 1735908232981, "status": "success", "end": 1735908234120, "result": "f614fec5-87a5-c227-4e0c-8fa76acbb271" }, { "data": { "id": "446f82eb-2794-4c01-bd71-e247abd6a39c", "isFull": true, "type": "remote" }, "id": "1735908234121", "message": "export", "start": 1735908234121, "status": "failure", "end": 1735908234135, "result": { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } }, { "data": { "id": "0927f4dc-4476-4ac3-959a-bc37e85956df", "isFull": true, "type": "remote" }, "id": "1735908234121:0", "message": "export", "start": 1735908234121, "status": "failure", "end": 1735908234129, "result": { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } }, { "id": "1735908234974", "message": "clean-vm", "start": 1735908234974, "status": "success", "end": 1735908235063, "result": { "merge": false } }, { "id": "1735908234994", "message": "clean-vm", "start": 1735908234994, "status": "success", "end": 1735908235091, "result": { "merge": false } }, { "id": "1735908235345", "message": "snapshot", "start": 1735908235345, "status": "success", "end": 1735908236519, "result": "319c12f9-6f35-411d-2a99-b2c55f7d469b" }, { "data": { "id": "446f82eb-2794-4c01-bd71-e247abd6a39c", "isFull": true, "type": "remote" }, "id": "1735908236520", "message": "export", "start": 1735908236520, "status": "failure", "end": 1735908236533, "result": { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } }, { "data": { "id": "0927f4dc-4476-4ac3-959a-bc37e85956df", "isFull": true, "type": "remote" }, "id": "1735908236520:0", "message": "export", "start": 1735908236520, "status": "failure", "end": 1735908236527, "result": { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } } ], "warnings": [ { "data": { "attempt": 1, "error": "all targets have failed, step: writer.prepare()" }, "message": "Retry the VM backup due to an error" }, { "data": { "attempt": 2, "error": "all targets have failed, step: writer.prepare()" }, "message": "Retry the VM backup due to an error" } ], "end": 1735908237352, "result": { "errors": [ { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" }, { "generatedMessage": false, "code": "ERR_ASSERTION", "actual": false, "expected": true, "operator": "strictEqual", "message": "entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52", "name": "AssertionError", "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: entries must be sorted in asc order 2025-01 2025-52\n at getOldEntries (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_getOldEntries.mjs:116:18)\n at IncrementalRemoteWriter._prepare (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalRemoteWriter.mjs:96:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)" } ], "message": "all targets have failed, step: writer.prepare()", "name": "Error", "stack": "Error: all targets have failed, step: writer.prepare()\n at IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner._callWriters (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_Abstract.mjs:64:13)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)\n at async IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner._copy (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/IncrementalXapi.mjs:42:5)\n at async IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner.run (file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_AbstractXapi.mjs:396:9)\n at async file:///root/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/VmsXapi.mjs:166:38" } } ], "end": 1735908237354 }
Maybe I'm wrong but I think we have a problem here. Could have something to do with the new year.
-
RE: Identify job from notification email
@McHenry
This is with theShorter backup reports
disabled: -
RE: Identify job from notification email
@McHenry
I enabled theShorter backup reports
in a failing backup job, and got the same short report as You did.