Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    145 Topics
    5k Posts
    A
    @rzr Updates installed and running. I also run the snapshot-fixer.py and xapi_leaked_vbds.py scripts... The fixer found/fixed lots on many pools... @andriy.sultanov I have the same error... On one pool, I ran snapshot-fixer.py and it fixed about 50 of them, but xapi_leaked_vbds.py still returns an error (before and after fix): Traceback (most recent call last): File "./xapi_leaked_vbds.py", line 23, in <module> snap = xapi.VM.get_parent(snap) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/XenAPI.py", line 317, in __call__ return self.__send(self.__name, args) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/XenAPI.py", line 198, in xenapi_request result = _parse_result(getattr(self, methodname)(*full_params)) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/XenAPI.py", line 292, in _parse_result raise Failure(result['ErrorDescription']) XenAPI.Failure: ['HANDLE_INVALID', 'VM', 'Ref:119']

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    henri9813H
    Hello @poddingue , you right. Yes i saw this article, but it was unrelated to my issue. I agree your guess. How can i mark the topic as Solved ?

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    29k Posts
    poddingueP
    I had a look at your screenshots. The Topology dropdown is greyed out with a tooltip saying Requires admin permissions, so this looks deliberate rather than broken: the field seems gated on being a full XO admin, not on being admin of your own resource set. I couldn't find an existing report asking for it to respect resource-set admin instead, so feedback.vates.tech is probably the right place to raise it. It would carry more weight coming from you, with those screenshots, than from me. I don't know whether the ACL rework changes any of this, so I wouldn't count on it until someone who works on it says so. Might be worth a mention to @Team-XO-Backend, since where that permission gate lives is really their call.

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    49 Topics
    765 Posts
    poddingueP
    The timing evidence here looks strong to me. Your second Grafana window is doing a lot of work: linstor-satellite.service jumps to roughly 8,700 log lines in the three minutes around the panic, well above linstor-controller at 926 and xapi at 460, and the priority chart goes red at the same moment. A backup that fans out volume creates and deletes across three replicas, landing on a DRBD race, fits what you are seeing. Throttling Velero should tell you a lot. If the crashes stop with clientQPS: 3 and itemBlockWorkerCount: 1, that narrows it to concurrency rather than anything about those particular volumes. For the logs question, a xen-bugtool --yestoall bundle from a host that has panicked is usually the thing people ask for first (https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/log-files), since it sweeps up the kernel side alongside the storage logs you already have in Loki. I don't know DRBD internals well enough to say which trace matters most, so it might be worth a mention to @Team-Storage. They can say what they actually need rather than have you guess, and a panic that reproduces on a schedule is a good deal easier for them to chase than most.

  • Non-English speakers

    36 Topics
    117 Posts
    B
    Merci beaucoup pour vos retours ! @nathanael-h : C'est l'étape suivante !!! J'ai découvert cluster API le mois dernier et j'ai déja testé sur d'autres plateforme ! ça déchire !!! Je ne savais pas qu'il y avait un support de XCP-ng ! Je finis ma série d'article pour une installation classique et je bascule sur cluster API ! @ataxyanetwork Merci pour ton repo. Je vais regarder ça