Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    143 Topics
    5k Posts
    F
    Installed on my usual test hosts. No issues so far.
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    laszlobortelL
    @aflons @jgrafton First of all, I would like to thank very much both of you for replying so quickly to this old thread! Our failure rate is roughly 1 frozen VM / 90 Rocky8 VMs / day, which is not tolerable. We have further hundreds of Rocky8 VMs on VMware, waiting for migration to XCP-ng. I tried to summarise our options: Our kernels are pretty fresh, but we can try the very latest available for Rocky 8. Upgrading to Rocky 9 on the sort term is not an option. We have to migrate Rocky 8 from VMware to XCP-ng first, then we can think about switching to Rocky 9 later. VMware tools removed during migration as part of the migration procedure. We are aready on shared lvmohba storage, which is a production grade Hitachi Vantara all SSD, same as under VMware, so I see no room for change/improvement here. As last resort we can try disable load-balancing plugin and reboot monthly during our maintenance window, but this would be an ugly workaround. Is there anything I forgot? @jgrafton Was there any useful suggestion or conclusion in your Vates support ticket #7726289? I am afraid that we are facing a tricky interworking issue between the xen hypervisor and the 4.18.0 kernel and both components are independent from XCP-ng and Vates.
  • 3k Topics
    28k Posts
    DanpD
    @skipthompson81 said: this CONFLICT is not OK! You will need to provide more details about this specific backup job. It's possible that the backup succeeded, but then the subsequent Health Check failed or timed out. Have you tried downloading and examining the full log from the failed backup? [image: 1781371917690-65a4470c-0b71-474b-b506-1512e1fbbf45-image.jpeg]
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    47 Topics
    755 Posts
    poddingueP
    Thanks for coming back to close it out. That's useful to know. So I was plenty wrong, as it was the XOSTOR licensing backend rather than the repo side I guessed at; those -32000 errors really don't give much away. For anyone landing here later: sounds like -32000 on XOSTOR creation can come from either end, a licensing/entitlement issue that support sorts, or a host not reaching the package repo, so both are worth checking. @alcoralcor, did support get yours sorted too, or is yours still the repodata / repo-reachability one? Glad you're unblocked either way.
  • 35 Topics
    113 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Ah excellente nouvelle Je passe le sujet en résolu !