Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    146 Topics
    5k Posts
    gduperreyG
    @MajorP93 We discussed your feedback yesterday, but we don't have an explanation at the moment. Our Windows expert tried to reproduce the behavior but was unable to trigger this error. Furthermore, we haven't encountered any issues on our end with the RPU (Rolling Pool Update) operations performed during our tests, whether done manually or via XO. It is possible, however, that we are missing the specific scenario (VMs or configuration) required to trigger this one. Have you been able to find any further information in the host logs? If not, could you export and send us a status report using xen-bugtool? Perhaps one of our developers will be able to spot something in it that helps explain the issue.
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    16k Posts
    O
    @yannsionneau I don't use Ubuntu, but I have a few linux vm's ranging from Debian 13-14 to RHEL 10 and in all of them the passthrough works fine.
  • 3k Topics
    29k Posts
    Z
    @poddingue Quick update: I disabled “Purge snapshot data when using CBT” in the XO replication job. I still see NBD+CBT displayed in the XO task manager during replication, but after letting the jobs run for a few cycles, last night’s Veeam backups completed without any CBT warnings or fallback to full. I’m going to add a couple more VMs and continue monitoring. We use Veeam as part of our overall backup strategy for regular VM backups, and switching away from it would be a fairly large project. Veeam doesn’t provide the XCP-ng replication we need, so we’re using XO specifically to maintain replicas at our other site which is why we are using both products.
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    55 Topics
    828 Posts
    Maelstrom96M
    Is there a chance something is broken with XOSTOR when adding a new node? I've added one and tried to ran the addHost command, but whatever I do, the SM logs are filled with Nov 3 18:45:01 van3-pprod-xen05 SM: [7577][MainThread] Got exception: Unable to find controller uri.... Retry number: 8 Nov 3 18:45:05 van3-pprod-xen05 SM: [4767][MainThread] Got exception: Unable to find controller uri.... Retry number: 16 Nov 3 18:45:23 van3-pprod-xen05 SM: [5313][MainThread] Got exception: Unable to find controller uri.... Retry number: 15 Nov 3 18:45:23 van3-pprod-xen05 SM: [9900][MainThread] Got exception: Unable to find controller uri.... Retry number: 3 Networking seems all good, but the node is not able to be enabled because of that.
  • 37 Topics
    137 Posts
    S
    @jqueiroz said: Bom dia a todos, Estou com um problema em uma VM, ela está ligando/desligando sozinha, repetidamente. Não encontro nenhuma mensagem de erro explicando o motivo. Alguém pode me dar alguma dica sobre como solucionar isso? Uso o XCP-NG 8.0 em um cluster de dois servidores HP Proliant DL-360, com o HA-Lizard. Tudo vinha funcionando bem até alguns dias atrás, quando houve uma queda de energia no datacenter da localidade. Tenho o mesmo arranjo de VMs/servidores em mais seis localidades, nenhuma apresenta esse problema. Analisar esse comportamento instável do cluster é quase como prever resultados complexos, parecendo a análise de riscos que a malta faz ao dar palpites no https://mostbetbrasil.lat. Grato. Como o problema começou depois da queda de energia e só acontece nessa localidade, eu começaria verificando os logs do XCP-ng e do HA-Lizard para entender quem está disparando os reinícios. Pode ser alguma política de HA tentando recuperar a VM repetidamente, algum problema de armazenamento ou até inconsistência no estado do host após a interrupção. Também vale conferir o estado do pool e os logs do Xen Orchestra, se estiver usando. Se possível, desative temporariamente a automação de recuperação dessa VM, com cuidado para não comprometer a disponibilidade, e veja se ela continua reiniciando sozinha. Isso ajuda a isolar a causa.