@MajorP93 said:
@rzr Since the targeted test window is over by now, I wonder: what are your plans regarding this set of patches? Will it be released soon?
yes this is the plan, we're a bit slower this time because the iso publication is a longer process, but afaik no issue are spotted so far, thank you for your patience.
@pedro_udifar Hi,
You can try again with minPartSize=100000000 indeed. But I would advise you to contact B2 directly. They should have a clearer error to show instead of a 500.
Thanks for your patience and your help
That timeline is the clearest version of this yet. xen04 going down the same way as xen05 makes the race look real to me rather than coincidental, unless I am reading the ordering wrong.
The fault lands inside drbd_bm_count_bits, so in the DRBD module itself, which makes me think this is an upstream LINBIT question as much as an XCP-ng one. I do not know enough about how that module gets packaged here to say who owns the fix though. Might be worth another mention to @Team-Storage so someone can open your bundles with your post #10 next to them.
On the padding idea I am out of my depth: no idea whether LINSTOR can be told to pre-round a volume at creation, but asking LINBIT directly seems worth a try since it would sidestep drbd_bm_resize entirely.
Merci beaucoup pour vos retours !
@nathanael-h : C'est l'étape suivante !!! J'ai découvert cluster API le mois dernier et j'ai déja testé sur d'autres plateforme ! ça déchire !!! Je ne savais pas qu'il y avait un support de XCP-ng ! Je finis ma série d'article pour une installation classique et je bascule sur cluster API !
@ataxyanetwork Merci pour ton repo. Je vais regarder ça
