Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    142 Topics
    4k Posts
    bvitnikB
    @Tristis-Oris maybe a few comparative screenshots would help
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    Y
    Hi, Someone from the Hypervisor & Kernel team will have a look shortly, we'll get back to you with our findings. Thanks a lot for the very detailed report! Yann
  • 3k Topics
    28k Posts
    P
    Hi, Did you notice that since latest releases (I guess from 6.3.0 upward) that the merge process in the final phase of backups is stalling ? 57 seconds of transfer phase, followed by 8min of clean VM stuff (probably merging) [image: 1775672881981-ac16ac28-913b-47f9-b5bd-8b755df463ed-image.jpeg] 2min47sec of transfer / 15min of clean-vm [image: 1775672976149-c0896855-8972-47c0-a1e7-c7b37a3fccb0-image.jpeg] when you have lots of VMs, this adds up a lot to the backup window... how could we make this better ? @florent could you describe what is happening in the two clean-vm phases ? start and end ? we tried many tricks to make this better (concurrency to 1 to avoid multiple mergings happening simultaneously, add cpu & RAM to the xoproxy VM, to the minio remotes too, to better handle the load) but quite not there yet... still having quite long merging times in regard to the transfered size (i know this isn't last transfer that is merged it's the oldest, but seeing this behavior on quite similar incremental backup transfers) I think this is new, due to latest releases and updates to backup code
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    44 Topics
    731 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Different use cases: Ceph is better with more hosts (at least 6 or 7 minimum) while XOSTOR is better between 3 to 7/8. We might have better Ceph support in the future for large clusters.
  • 34 Topics
    102 Posts
    B
    La remarque a été intégrée dans l'article: https://www.myprivatelab.tech/xcp_lab_v2_ha#perte-master Merci encore pour le retour.