Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    144 Topics
    5k Posts
    rzrR
    @marcoi said: Applied the latest pushed updated to production, no major issues. Thank you for testing The only thing to note is my backup XCP config failed Sunday, (...) This morning the backup ran without issues. Glad it has finally to work, if problem occurs again feel free to ask about this feature in this subforum: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/category/21/backup
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    M
    @poddingue Yeah, that does make sense. I understand that this wouldn't necessarily be an intended usecase. I'll probably just get a cheap consumer GPU. And apologies for if this question is painfully obvious, but how would I mention @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel? But if I can hypothesize, firmware is usually accessible via sysfs, there's an Archlinux guide here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface/Secure_Boot#Determine_OpROM_signature for determining OpROM signatures, which includes getting it as a file, so maybe that could be loaded in someway, but I know not of the feasibility of that.
  • 3k Topics
    28k Posts
    florentF
    @poddingue said: Thanks for the detailed write-up, Pedro. I'm not a backup expert, far from it. but you might be right that https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9396 only fixed the size estimation for direct full backups, not the mirror path. Your error is the same as the maximum size allowed one, just twelve bytes over 209715200000. Before this turns into a GitHub issue, it would help to know whether it reproduces on a fresh mirror job and whether bumping minPartSize actually cleared it, so we can be sure it's the mirror code and not the B2 remote settings. The object storage docs list Backblaze B2 as supported (https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/xo5/object-storage-support#supported-storage-providers) but don't say much about part-size tuning. If it's awkward to test in isolation, a mention to @Team-XO-Backend is probably the quickest route, since they own the backup job code. The XVA checksum warnings in your second screenshot look like a separate non-blocking clean VM directory step rather than the cause. I hope that points somewhere useful! nice catch and the mirror path is easier to fix . Thaks @pedro_udifar and @poddingue we will fix it asap will it be possible to test a potential fix @pedro_udifar , since it's often specific to a provider ( and need huge VM to work )?
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    48 Topics
    758 Posts
    J
    I've installed the latest updates to all hosts, and restarted everything. I also have all xcp-ng logs going into loki now, so next time something happens I will see everything lol. [image: 1782860175138-156f9ac1-f1bb-47f3-a789-8551c8614805-image-resized.jpeg]
  • 35 Topics
    113 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Ah excellente nouvelle Je passe le sujet en résolu !