Hi,
Someone from the Hypervisor & Kernel team will have a look shortly, we'll get back to you with our findings.
Thanks a lot for the very detailed report!
Yann
@Pilow Yeah maybe but I hoped that XOA is somewhat aligned with XO from sources users. At least in a way that XO-CE users have the option to use the same Node version that Vates declares as most stable to use.
With the introduction of disk-cli this is not the case anymore.
//EDIT: at least when using the common scripts or docker containers maintained by community for running XO-CE. Those scripts / Dockerfiles could be edited to exclude disk-cli. Then it would still be possible to run XO on Node 20 I guess.
Different use cases: Ceph is better with more hosts (at least 6 or 7 minimum) while XOSTOR is better between 3 to 7/8.
We might have better Ceph support in the future for large clusters.
