Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    145 Topics
    5k Posts
    gduperreyG
    Thank you everyone for your tests and your feedback! The updates are live now: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/08/27/august-2026-updates-2-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    julienXOvatesJ
    @acomav We will actually propose to change the date and time format in XO6 settings, so you would be able to choose between : YYYY-MM-DD MM/DD/YYYY DD/MM/YYYY and 12h or 24h time format. Hopefully in one of the next 3 months ! I hope that will answer your need, otherwise let me know !
  • 3k Topics
    29k Posts
    K
    @Cyrille Thanks for the response. Regarding the --controllers=cloud-node-label-sync flag: RKE2 does not use an external cloud-controller-manager (CCM) by default unless explicitly configured; it relies on its internal node controllers. Because of this, it won't automatically sync the topology.k8s.xenorchestra/* labels required by your CSI topology setup. The main issue we are running into: Even though we applied the topology labels to the node objects manually, the XenOrchestra CSI driver's ExternalProvisioning loop is failing with a ProvisioningFailed error (error generating accessibility requirements: no topology key found for node). This happens because the CSI driver expects the specific node providerID format to match XenServer / XenOrchestra constraints so it can look up and validate those manual topology keys. Because RKE2 sets its own providerID formatting (providerID: rke2://koushik-xen01), the CSI driver cannot map the node to its Xen pool configuration. Is there any flag or configuration in the CSI driver to completely bypass the strict CCM/Topology validation logic for non-native cloud setups, or do we have to wait for an update that allows an option like is-the-ccm-mandatory=false?
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    50 Topics
    796 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Great, thanks for the feedback!
  • 37 Topics
    136 Posts
    J
    @AtaxyaNetwork Merci pour tes recherches ! Oui "cd_label" serait cool comme ajout au plugin ce qui permet sur les distro type Fedora/Redhat de ne pas avoir de boot_command à gérer