Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    142 Topics
    4k Posts
    Tristis OrisT
    @benapetr Nice, great. How about to implement a launch of CR backup VMs? https://xcp-ng.org/forum/assets/uploads/files/1769679350079-677dfcbb-211b-452f-ad8f-db59e2860579-изображение.png https://xcp-ng.org/forum/assets/uploads/files/1769679584572-3e39d799-a2fd-4cb0-8e2e-6b9c4312a2e6-изображение.png
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    14k Posts
    gskgerG
    Hi everyone, I’m currently working with XCP-ng 8.3 (fully updated) on a Dell PowerEdge R720 in my homelab, and I’m trying to access the iDRAC interface of the same server from a Debian 12 VM using ipmitool. I want to use the OS-to-iDRAC Pass-Through feature (USB NIC) to allow the VM to communicate directly with the iDRAC, so I can run ipmitool commands like power status, fan control, etc., from within the VM without going over the network (which is segmented off). What is working The iDRAC Pass-Through feature is enabled in the iDRAC web interface under: iDRAC Settings → Network → OS to iDRAC Pass-Through (USB NIC set to the IP: 169.254.0.1) The iDRAC network test confirms it’s working. The pass-through interface (PIF) appears in XCP-ng’s host network list as idrac. I’ve attached it to a Debian 12 VM, where it shows up as enX1. The VM has correctly assigned 169.254.0.2/24 via /etc/network/interfaces. Despite the correct IP assignment, I cannot ping 169.254.0.1 from the VM: # Output of ip a (shortened) 3: enX1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether d6:24:9e:46:de:64 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 169.254.0.2/24 brd 169.254.0.255 scope global enX1 ping 169.254.0.1 # Output: # From 169.254.0.2 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable # (repeats) And ipmitool fails with: ipmitool -I lanplus -H 169.254.0.1 -U <user> -P <password> power status # Error: Unable to establish IPMI v2 / RMCP+ session Tested the same as a bare metal setup on another R720 with Debian 12 and that worked as expected. I have a distinct feeling that I have asked this question before, but unfortunately I can't find the post anymore. Any insights, tips, or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated!
  • 3k Topics
    27k Posts
    florentF
    @henri9813 the warm mode is more manual by XO, and it can replicate from almost any version to any version, or any CPU to any CPU the direct migration has some precondition : always migrate to te same or superior version. Live migration also add some condition on the CPU brand and generation
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    40 Topics
    715 Posts
    I
    @ronan-a Thanks
  • 31 Topics
    90 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Yes, account aren't related