XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Why are transfer sizes different between XO5 & XO6?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Backup
    12 Posts 4 Posters 136 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      probain @Danp
      last edited by

      @Danp

      Ah, yes. Sorry for not supplying that bit of crucial information.

      XO from source: a1dba

      I should also say that I believe the transfer size is from Delta Backups. And also, I find XO5 to be better descriptive of how large the amount of backup-data was sent to the remote. Whilst XO6 includes the amount of data from Health Checks sent as well. If this is the case, then the amount if Health Check data, isn't relevant imho. Or should be placed in brackets or similar.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Reply Quote 0
      • DanpD
        Danp Pro Support Team
        last edited by Danp

        I'm not seeing this discrepancy on either XOA 6.8.2 or XO from sources (commit a1dba). Does it occur with all backup jobs or only some of them?

        Also, I'm not sure that I understood your reference to the side panel. Are you not able to view it in XO6?

        Edit: Just saw your comment regarding health checks. This is certainly something to investigate.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        Reply Quote 0
        • P
          probain @Danp
          last edited by

          @Danp

          The backup jobs are Delta Backups. And other than the Health Checks-theory, I don't really have a theory of why the same job would report 28GB transfered in XO5, but 172GB in XO6.

          The comment about the side panel, is more an emphasis that it is very difficult to read and extract the relevant information from. Whereas in XO5 that information was presented far easier. Both from a readability standpoint, but also accessibility. Where I have a very hard time with being able to focus on elements in XO6... But that is another topic for another day. I'm eagerly hoping for it to mature more. And it is slowly getting better.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jr-m4
            last edited by

            Same thing here:
            Commit: a1dba

            XO5 transfers ~ 9-20GB
            XO6 transfers ~ 100-180GB

            image.jpeg
            image.jpeg

            1 Reply Last reply
            Reply Quote 0
            • acebmxerA
              acebmxer
              last edited by acebmxer

              I am seeing similar but only 1 vm backup is different.

              XO - commit a1dba
              719.71 GB vs 415.96 GiB (Full backup)

              Screenshot_20260923_061016.png

              Screenshot_20260923_061028.png

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply Quote 1
              • DanpD
                Danp Pro Support Team
                last edited by

                For those of you that are observing a difference in the reported transfer size between XO5 and XO6, can you please let us know if the affected backup jobs are performing health checks?

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jr-m4 @Danp
                  last edited by

                  @Danp
                  I have Healtch Checks on my Delta Backups. Yes

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply Quote 0
                  • acebmxerA
                    acebmxer
                    last edited by acebmxer

                    @danp

                    testing now... i did not have it enabled on my deltas but did have it enabled on full.. Running delta now with enabled. will report back.

                    Edit - still running but i think thats the issue health check is part of the calculation..

                    Screenshot 2026-09-23 100329.png

                    Screenshot 2026-09-23 100424.png

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply Quote 0
                    • DanpD
                      Danp Pro Support Team
                      last edited by

                      I've confirmed the discrepancy when health checks are performed. Let's see what @Team-XO-Backend has to say about this.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply Quote 2
                      • P
                        probain @Danp
                        last edited by

                        @Danp
                        Happy to hear that you too were able to reproduce the phenomenon.
                        Thank you for taking the time to look.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post