XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.0.0 Release Candidate

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    66 Posts 23 Posters 32.6k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      janvs0 @ajmind
      last edited by janvs0

      Upgrade from Citrix XenServer 6.5 > Citrix XenServer 7.6 > XCP-ng 8.0.0 with prefinal .iso went smooth without any problem on a 3 box pool. Moved to the "new" partition scheme from XS6.5 -> XS7.6 and used the prepare_host_upgrade.py (rolling pool) method. Had no issues migrating the existing VM's upward.

      Perhaps it would've been possible to go from XS6.5 straight to XCP-ng 8.0.0 (after applying hotfix RPU002) but since this is a production cluster I didn't want to make it too risky (yes, I know this is not quite final yet). 😉

      //edit: Forgot to mention these are Dell PowerEdge R720s on Intel E5 2660's using FC storage.

      Thanks XCP-ng team! 👍

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • M Offline
        mike
        last edited by

        Quick (hopefully not dumb) question: Will XCP-ng 8.0 support VDIs larger than 2TB? I see mention of the qcow2 format dotted around but nothing concrete about if/when it will be implemented. Cheers. 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          I wouldn't consider SMAPIv3 production ready yet. Our first objective would be exporting qcow2 files to be able to backup those (so if you have an issue, at least you have backups!)

          Surprisingly (or not 😆 ) Citrix didn't planned any way to export VM disk in the format they chose themselves 😆 (qcow2)

          So now @ronan-a is working on integrating that into SMAPIv3. As soon it's done (a PoC should be around this summer), we'll try to publish various "drivers" (ZFS, ext4, xfs, NFS) for people who want to experiment, with also a PoC in Xen Orchestra to be able to "save"/backup those QCOW2 files.

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • M Offline
            mike @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert Thanks for the super-quick reply as usual! I feel like I should make a new thread for it, but what are you views on using raw VDIs to get around the limit? http://www.ervik.as/how-to-create-a-raw-logical-volume-manager-virtual-disk-infrastructure-with-xenserver/

            I realise you can't snapshot raw disks, but are there any other pitfalls to it?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Doing hat is like plugin a disk directly to the VM, you'll lose all virtualization flexibility:

              • no snapshot
              • no backup
              • no migration

              So do that in last resort, if you can't avoid a 2TiB disk or you can't afford a NAS.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H Offline
                Hans @ajmind
                last edited by

                This post is deleted!
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H Offline
                  Hans @ajmind
                  last edited by

                  @ajmind Did you get the Windows XP up and running with any XenTools? I was able to live migrate from 7.2 to 8.0 with XP still running, but it wont boot after shutdown.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • A Offline
                    ajmind @Hans
                    last edited by

                    @Hans
                    No, it was not successful, except to boot the VM in safe mode and to remove the Xentools and drivers via the Software Control Panel. However, this has left the VM unusable and the activation was also lost.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ruskofdR Offline
                      ruskofd
                      last edited by ruskofd

                      I think there is typo concerning UEFI. It seems only available for Windows guest only.

                      85b750ef-bcd9-4f7b-bf15-868859a68fa1-image.png

                      From Citrix :

                      c7121743-bb4b-4227-b267-3e9240000740-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by olivierlambert

                        You don't have this limitation in Xen Orchestra. I suppose Citrix didn't test it for other distro, but I'm running Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu on it without issues.

                        Again, I would recommend XO as main client for XCP-ng 😉

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ruskofdR Offline
                          ruskofd
                          last edited by

                          Oh nice ! I didn't tested it that's why, glad to hear that !
                          I use XO only too, but for fresh setup installation, I use XCP-ng Center (for XO from sources).

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • borzelB Offline
                            borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                            last edited by

                            anyone can request a change in https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/issues 🙂

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post