XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    264 Posts 43 Posters 176.6k Views 39 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gskgerG Offline
      gskger Top contributor @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi No problem with a rolling pool update of my two playlab host. Pool reports up-to-date and healthy (XO from source). Basic VM and VDI tasks work as expected. Looking good 👍

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • R Offline
        ravenet @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi No issues so far on Ryzen 1700x, Xeon e5-2640v3, and 2 Epyc 7313P systems

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • AnonabharA Offline
          Anonabhar
          last edited by

          Updated my HP DL360 G7 home lab with no problem at all.. Everything seems to work OK.. 8-)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • stormiS Online
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @exetico
            last edited by

            @exetico said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

            @stormi Thanks. I'll cross my fingers for a fix, at some time.

            I noticed that /etc/xensource/usb-policy.conf was send back to stock configuration, so I readded my modification to it. I'm not sure, if that's the expected behavior, after the host update + restart.

            Yes, it is. I opened this upstream issue about it, but no common decision was reached yet: https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/issues/4935

            stormi created this issue in xapi-project/xen-api

            open Packaging: xapi-core RPM updates overwrite custom user config in usb-policy.conf #4935

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • S Offline
              Strebor
              last edited by

              No problems here updating a testpool with 2x NUC11TNHi5 (i5-1135G7 and I225-LM 2.5GB NIC)
              Updated both from shell, rebooted master first, then the other NUC.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • S Offline
                steff22
                last edited by

                anyone tried to install on asus pn52?

                struggling with the network not working. is bad speed without guest tolls not installed and with installed Xcp-ng tools 8.2.2.200 the network hangs and does not exist same with xen guest tools

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Online
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  I pushed a few updates to the xcp-ng-base repository. Update with yum update or Xen Orchestra.

                  Changes:

                  • xcp-ng-release* mostly changes for the imminent new release of installer images
                  • openvswitch: fix DoS security issue, CVE-2023-1668
                  • xcp-ng-xapi-plugins: enable installing new packages from Xen Orchestra, and also applying updates from the xcp-ng-linstor repository. This is preliminary work for XOSTOR support in XCP-ng 8.3.
                  • zstd updated to 1.5.5, which is a bugfix release.
                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    steff22 @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi ok, installing the patch didn't help the network speed.

                    Are probably the drivers for the RTK8125B with which there are some bugs. I get full speed when I install Windows 10 on the Asus PN52.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      steff22 @steff22
                      last edited by

                      @steff22 Are the guest tools that have support for Xcp-ng 8.3 ?

                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        CptHyper @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert Any plans to support this for manual snapshots as well ? If required we could add [NOSNAP] as well to have an option.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Online
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          @CptHyper I'm not sure to understand what are you talking about. Can you be more specific?

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Online
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @steff22
                            last edited by

                            @steff22 said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

                            @steff22 Are the guest tools that have support for Xcp-ng 8.3 ?

                            XCP-ng 8.3 does not require a change in the guest tools.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • C Offline
                              CptHyper @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert sure, i mean the possibility to exclude disks from Snapshots. You said its only possible if the snapshot is triggered by an Backup job, but i think this would be useful as well for manual snapshots or ones triggered by the API. A separate (additional) naming [NOSNAP] would make sure people have to opt in.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Online
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by stormi

                                We just released XCP-ng 8.3 beta 1 !

                                I opened a new thread for us to discuss it and for you to provide feedback: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/7464/xcp-ng-8-3-beta

                                Thanks for all the feedback already provided here, and see you on this new thread!

                                In order not to miss anything (and, let's be honest, for me to be sure that messages on the new thread reach you all), the best course of action is: open the new thread right now and use the "watch" button.
                                53fac025-6e0c-465b-97ab-5ca73a97bd93-image.png

                                And let's answer this common and legitimate question: how to upgrade from alpha to beta ? Well, there's nothing to do, just update as usual. In fact, you might already be in beta state. However, as indicated in the blog post, we need a lot of testing of the installer, so it's also an option to start from the installation ISO again.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • C cocoon referenced this topic on
                                • First post
                                  Last post