XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E Offline
      ecoutinho @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi OK, thanks, I'll finish upgrading the other hosts.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @brezlord
        last edited by

        @brezlord If you haven't reinstalled it yet, yes, we could use more information about the host, the PCI passthrough setup on it, how the error is triggered exactly, and various logs. And/or a support tunnel to have a look by ourselves.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • BenjiReisB Offline
          BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @brezlord
          last edited by BenjiReis

          @brezlord Can you sahre the value you put in the xen-cmdline on 8.2?

          I think the XAPI awaits this format: xen-pciback.hide=(pci-id1)(pci-id2)... and will fail the value doesn't match this format.

          brezlordB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • brezlordB Offline
            brezlord @BenjiReis
            last edited by

            @BenjiReis Sorry I have destroyed the host and loaded a fresh install of 8.3. If you'd like I can install 8.2 on a host and pass through a pci device via the cmd then upgrade to 8.3 and see if the error is reproducible.

            BenjiReisB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BenjiReisB Offline
              BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @brezlord
              last edited by

              @brezlord If it's not to much a bother that would be great yeah.
              Comparing the xen-cmdline when doing the passthrough manually on 8.2 VS how it looks on 8.3 and when done via the XAPI.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                I'm pushed a new set of updates, hopefully the last one before the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0 RC2, which itself should be followed shortly by the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0 itself.

                Main packages

                • intel-microcode-20240717-1.xcpng8.3: updated microcode for Intel vulnerabilities
                • sm-3.2.3-1.4.xcpng8.3: fix the cause of a warning displayed during update, and restore changes that we had removed because they were suspected to cause issues in some cases with iSCSI, but revealed themselves necessary to support another kind of setup.
                • vim-7.4.629-8.el7_9 (which provides vim-minimal, installed by default): bugfixes and security fixes
                • xapi-24.19.2-1.3.xcpng8.3: Fixes an issue where new fields in XAPI DB for certificate fingerprints were not populated, which under some circumstances caused joining new hosts to a pool fail.
                • xcp-ng-release-8.3.0-28:
                  • Update repository files for CentOS and EPEL.
                  • Point at repo.vates.tech for CentOS since mirrorlist.centos.org was cut
                  • Add "(EOL)" to repo descriptions for EOL repos
                  • Drop unused repos

                Optional package

                • kernel-alt-4.19.316+1-2.xcpng8.3: Enable CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE in kernel config
                • ldns-1.7.0-21.xcpng8.3 + libreswan-4.12-2.3.1.xcpng8.3: security updates
                A R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • A Offline
                  Ajmind 0 @stormi
                  last edited by

                  On my 8.3 test pool I am unable to create SR ISO libary (SMB/cifs).

                  On my production pools with XCP-NG 8.2.x it does work as expected.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Can you provide a bit more details? Errors and such.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      Ajmind 0 @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert
                      yes I can 🙂

                      on dom0:

                      mount -t cifs --verbose -o username=admin,password=******** //192.168.1.202/iso /mnt/test
                      mount.cifs kernel mount options: ip=192.168.1.202,unc=\\192.168.1.202\iso,user=admin,pass=********
                      mount error(112): Host is down
                      
                      

                      XCP-NG Center:

                      Creating ISO SR 'SMB ISO library' on 'IT1HALIZARD-TEST1'
                      Unable to mount the directory specified in device configuration request	it1xcp-ng-test-slave1	Sep 5, 2024 12:59 PM	Dismiss
                      

                      XO from Sources:

                      sr.createIso
                      {
                        "host": "c1f34b07-c4dc-4584-8bc0-a01bcec81c5b",
                        "nameLabel": "test",
                        "nameDescription": "test",
                        "path": "\\\\192.168.1.202\\public\\iso",
                        "type": "smb",
                        "user": "admin",
                        "password": "* obfuscated *"
                      }
                      {
                        "code": "SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_222",
                        "params": [
                          "",
                          "Could not mount the directory specified in Device Configuration [opterr=mount error(112): Host is down
                      Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)]",
                          ""
                        ],
                        "call": {
                          "method": "SR.create",
                          "params": [
                            "OpaqueRef:cee521f7-dc00-5d91-1499-6143d2fd0040",
                            {
                              "type": "cifs",
                              "username": "admin",
                              "cifspassword": "* obfuscated *",
                              "location": "//192.168.1.202/public/iso"
                            },
                            0,
                            "test",
                            "test",
                            "iso",
                            "iso",
                            true,
                            {}
                          ]
                        },
                        "message": "SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_222(, Could not mount the directory specified in Device Configuration [opterr=mount error(112): Host is down
                      Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)], )",
                        "name": "XapiError",
                        "stack": "XapiError: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_222(, Could not mount the directory specified in Device Configuration [opterr=mount error(112): Host is down
                      Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)], )
                          at Function.wrap (file:///srv/xen-orchestra/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)
                          at file:///srv/xen-orchestra/packages/xen-api/transports/json-rpc.mjs:38:21
                          at runNextTicks (node:internal/process/task_queues:60:5)
                          at processImmediate (node:internal/timers:447:9)
                          at process.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:128:17)"
                      }
                      

                      The SR is mounted on our production pools.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Well, clearly, as it comes from 2 different systems (XOA and XCP-ng) you have an issue to reach this IP address. It's simply not up and running or not connected to this IP (or blocked) from XCP-ng/XO perspective.

                        S A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          steff22 @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          Don't know if this is the right place for this forum post.

                          But is it possible to pass through Usb keyboard, mouse or bluetooth adapter to a vm? None of these things appear in Xen Orchestra.

                          Smart house z-wave usb stick appears right away in Xen Orchestra

                          Or must I buy a usb to pcie card and passthrough this to vm to make it work

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            I think yes, but probably need some tinkering in the USB script filtering some devices for security reasons. It's documented: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute/#passing-through-keyboards-and-mice

                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S Offline
                              steff22 @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert ok thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                Ajmind 0 @olivierlambert
                                last edited by

                                @olivierlambert

                                you are right 👍

                                The standard gateway has blocked access of NAS.

                                Could be closed.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • C Offline
                                  CJ
                                  last edited by

                                  Is there a way to track the progress of applying patches to a host? I'm updating the master of one of my pools and it dropped out of XO and hasn't come back yet. I don't recall applying patches to take this long normally.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Yes, you can check the yum history for example, eg yum history list

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C Offline
                                      CJ @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by CJ

                                      @olivierlambert I'm seeing 27 EE which seems to indicate that it worked but there was an error?

                                      I have had XO display errors when performing updates but there's currently nothing in the logs and the pool still isn't showing up.

                                      Using yum history info it appears to output EE whenever the scriptlet has an output. In this case it returned ok and I also have lines regarding disabling the repos.

                                      Now I'm getting UND_ERR_SOCKET as an error on the Servers page. If I disable and then enable the server, I get write ECONNRESET.

                                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R Offline
                                        redakula @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                        Optional package

                                        • kernel-alt-4.19.316+1-2.xcpng8.3: Enable CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE in kernel config

                                        I see some mentions of this option in relation to fan speeds.

                                        But what is the status on AMD support in general?
                                        I have a recent AMD platform, and from what i can see a lot has been added for AMD support in the past few kernel versions.
                                        Particularly in relation to power management.

                                        I did a purely unscientific test and booted a ubuntu 24.04 live cd on my XCP-NG server, and the power consumption was 10-15% lower at similar load level, compared to XCP-NG.

                                        Is the hardware support for e.g. power management handled by the kernel in dom0 or by Xen?

                                        What are the current plans for a more recent kernel for dom0 - i have not seen anything on kernel version plans for a long time?

                                        Keep up the good work 👍 😁

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                          last edited by olivierlambert

                                          @redakula said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                          Is the hardware support for e.g. power management handled by the kernel in dom0 or by Xen?

                                          It's a very complex question where there's no definite answer. But to answer your question, yes, XCP-ng 9 will have a recent kernel, providing many benefits for I/O and potentially power usage.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @CJ
                                            last edited by

                                            @CJ it may be that XAPI or stunnel failed to fully start.

                                            Check:

                                            systemctl status xapi-wait-init-complete.service
                                            systemctl status stunnel@xapi.service
                                            
                                            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post