XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Since you are able to reproduce consistently the issue, it might be interesting to get more logs/debug to find the root cause πŸ™‚ Pinging @dthenot and all relevant people that could help in here πŸ™‚

      jhansenJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • yannY Offline
        yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Ajmind 0
        last edited by

        @Ajmind-0 there may be more details in the log a bit before those last lines, and they would not be visible because of the screen size and volume of logs. You can switch to the console with a shell and have a look into /tmp/install-log, there may be some more useful info in there.

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jhansenJ Offline
          jhansen @olivierlambert
          last edited by

          @olivierlambert
          Unfortunately, I don't have much time in the next few days.
          On Sunday I will reset one of the pools with the error to NBD / CBT Delta Backup and then pull the logs and compare them with the one from the working 9.3. Let's see if I can see anything there. If not, I will send you the logs. I will also take a closer look at which processes are stuck there. It looks to me like there are ghost processes running there that don't terminate but seem to continue to block the snapshot. That also seems to be the reason why the snapshot cannot be deleted, except after a reboot.
          If I have time, I will also set up a new pool with 9.3 RC2 and then update it to 9.3 officially via yum, just to see if it can then also do error-free NBD deltas.
          Regards Joerg

          dthenotD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dthenotD Offline
            dthenot Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @jhansen
            last edited by

            @jhansen
            Hello,
            I created a thread about the NBD issue where VBD are left connected to Dom0.
            I added what I already know about the situation on my side.
            Anyone observing the error can help us by sharing what they observed in the thread.

            https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/9864/vdi-staying-connected-to-dom0-when-using-nbd-backups

            Thanks

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • A Offline
              Ajmind 0 @yann
              last edited by

              @yann

              the systems freezes after the last screen and it is diffult to catch the log just before the freeze...

              yannY FinallfF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • yannY Offline
                yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Ajmind 0
                last edited by

                @Ajmind-0 does it still freeze if you add atexit=shell on the linux commandline? In some error situations the installer attempts to reboot the system after a few seconds, this will make it drop into a shell instead.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • FinallfF Offline
                  Finallf @Ajmind 0
                  last edited by

                  @Ajmind-0 try using the save option at the beginning of the installation.

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Finallf
                    last edited by

                    @Finallf I think @Ajmind-0 already tried booting the installer in safe mode.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • A Offline
                      Ajmind 0 @stormi
                      last edited by

                      I have started the installer again in the BIOS mode and have finished this process successful. It seems to be that the "EFI" Mode from the old intel server is the problem.

                      As this old equipment is only used as a testing playground I could stay with it as it is. The hardware will never be used as a production system.

                      yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • yannY Offline
                        yann Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Ajmind 0
                        last edited by

                        @Ajmind-0 this was an install not an upgrade of 8.2.1, right? Was your previous working install of 8.2.1 in UEFI mode?

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          Ajmind 0 @yann
                          last edited by

                          @yann
                          Yes, it was a fresh install. I have removed any partition layout from the Hardware RAID1 via gparted before I have started from scratch.

                          The previous 8.2.1 install was also created in BIOS mode. For me it is clear that this old EFI Intel BIOS from 2012 lacks support for this kind of install process. πŸ˜‰

                          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J Offline
                            john.c @Ajmind 0
                            last edited by

                            @Ajmind-0 said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                            @yann
                            Yes, it was a fresh install. I have removed any partition layout from the Hardware RAID1 via gparted before I have started from scratch.

                            The previous 8.2.1 install was also created in BIOS mode. For me it is clear that this old EFI Intel BIOS from 2012 lacks support for this kind of install process. πŸ˜‰

                            What model of Intel Server is it?

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A Offline
                              Ajmind 0 @john.c
                              last edited by

                              @john-c
                              Intel Server (SR2625/S5520UR / Dual Xeon E5645)

                              L J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L Offline
                                laurentm @Ajmind 0
                                last edited by

                                @Ajmind-0 Same problem with DELL PowerEdge R820 and DELL PowerEdge R520:

                                I had to upgrade in BIOS mode and it was the same thing for a fresh install.

                                With DELL PowerEdge R240, no problem to upgfrade in UEFI.

                                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J Offline
                                  john.c @Ajmind 0
                                  last edited by john.c

                                  @Ajmind-0 said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                  @john-c
                                  Intel Server (SR2625/S5520UR / Dual Xeon E5645)

                                  If you can access from Intel with an account associated with the motherboard. There's a firmware update available which will add EFI (UEFI) mode support, but to enable it may require adjusting a bios setting. That EFI mode will highly likely or even definitely not include support for SecureBoot.

                                  L A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J Offline
                                    john.c @laurentm
                                    last edited by

                                    @laurentm said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                    @Ajmind-0 Same problem with DELL PowerEdge R820 and DELL PowerEdge R520:

                                    I had to upgrade in BIOS mode and it was the same thing for a fresh install.

                                    With DELL PowerEdge R240, no problem to upgfrade in UEFI.

                                    You can switch to EFI mode in the BIOS setup of Dell PowerEdge R520 and Dell PowerEdge R820. I know this for sure as my home lab is based around a trio Dell PowerEdge R620 servers.

                                    I found this out when navigating around the BIOS settings, specifically its in the Boot Mode options settings.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • L Offline
                                      laurentm @john.c
                                      last edited by

                                      @john-c I know already that, bios was updated and it was easy to boot in UEFI but the install failed and even complains about not enough space on EFI boot part.
                                      I tried after wiping all disks but could not perform the install all the way.
                                      Either with SATA SSDs or NVMe (with an upgraded DELL backplane designed for NVMe) it never works.

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J Offline
                                        john.c @laurentm
                                        last edited by john.c

                                        @laurentm said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                        @john-c I know already that, bios was updated and it was easy to boot in UEFI but the install failed and even complains about not enough space on EFI boot part.
                                        I tried after wiping all disks but could not perform the install all the way.
                                        Either with SATA SSDs or NVMe (with an upgraded DELL backplane designed for NVMe) it never works.

                                        SSD drives eventually fill and/or wear up so you eventually don't have enough space for data. Also if the amount of data needed for booting is larger than the size of EFI boot partition it will run out of space and complain.

                                        Also how large is the OS drive's capacity is it large enough capacity to exceed the system requirements for XCP-ng? The OS drive gets partitioned according to a predetermined fixed structure so if the drive isn't large enough, then when partitioning it may make them too small.

                                        @yann How large does XCP-ng make the EFI boot partition please, as for laurentm it may not be making it with sufficient size?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jhansenJ Offline
                                          jhansen
                                          last edited by

                                          Hello,
                                          I also had problems installing Beta 2 on older servers.
                                          Switch from BIOS to UEFI under Boot in the BIOS.
                                          Take a USB stick with the RC1, install and update with yum update
                                          or
                                          just use the new 8.3 Official.

                                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @jhansen
                                            last edited by

                                            @jhansen Installing from RC1 then updating with yum update is not supported. The release notes state you must reinstall from prereleases of XCP-ng 8.3, unless you installed using XCP-ng 8.3 RC2 (and now that the final release is out, there's no reason to keep installing a pre-release).

                                            jhansenJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post