Continuous Replication jobs creates full backups every time since 2025-09-06 (xo from source)

olivierlambert

@Andrew And it doesn't with the commit just before?

Andrew

@olivierlambert Correct. Running commit 4944ea902ff19f172b1b86ec96ad989e322bec2c works.

olivierlambert

@florent so it's like https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/a459015ca91c159123bb682f16237b4371a312a6 might introduced a regression?

0

fbeauchamp committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra

Fix(replication): VDI_NOT_MANAGED error  (#8935)

from ticket #40151

florent

@Andrew then again, with such a precise report, the fix is easier

the fix should join master soon

olivierlambert

If you want to test, you can switch to the relevant branch, which is fix_replication

https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/8971

fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

open fix(backups): replication doiing always a full #8971

Andrew

@olivierlambert fix_replication works for some... but most of my VMs now have an error:
the writer IncrementalXapiWriter has failed the step writer.checkBaseVdis() with error Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'managed').

      "result": {
        "message": "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'managed')",
        "name": "TypeError",
        "stack": "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'managed')\n    at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalXapiWriter.mjs:29:15\n    at Array.filter (<anonymous>)\n    at IncrementalXapiWriter.checkBaseVdis (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_writers/IncrementalXapiWriter.mjs:26:8)\n    at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/IncrementalXapi.mjs:159:54\n    at callWriter (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_Abstract.mjs:33:15)\n    at IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner._callWriters (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_Abstract.mjs:52:14)\n    at IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner._selectBaseVm (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/IncrementalXapi.mjs:158:16)\n    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n    at async IncrementalXapiVmBackupRunner.run (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/_vmRunners/_AbstractXapi.mjs:378:5)\n    at async file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202509150025/@xen-orchestra/backups/_runners/VmsXapi.mjs:166:38"
      }

olivierlambert

Feedback for you @florent

JB

@peo Yes, same problem!

Andrew

@olivierlambert @florent Looks like 1471ab0c7c79fa6dca9a1598e7be2a141753ba91 (in current master) has fixed the issue.

But, during testing I found a new related issue (no error messages). Running current XO master b16d5...

During the normal CR delta backup job, two VMs shows the warning message: Backup fell back to a full but it did a delta (not full) backup.

I caused this by running a different CR backup job (for testing) that used the two same VMs but to a different SR. The new test job did a full backup and delta backup correctly. Since there is only one CBT snapshot the normal backup job did recognize that the snapshot was not for the original normal backup job and should have done a full (and started a new CBT snapshot), but it only did a short delta.

As the VMs were off, I guess it could correctly use the other CBT snapshot as no blocks had changed... Just odd that CR backup said it was going to do a full and then did a delta.

JB

@Andrew

florent

@JB this means that it should have done a delta ( as per the full backup interval ) , but had to fall back to a full for at least one disk
this can happens after a failed transfer, a new disk added and some edge case. This issue was not really visible before the latest release, even if the impacts can be important , saturating network and storage.

We are investigating this ( especially @Bastien-Nollet ) , and expect to have a fix and/or an explanation fast

Are you using "purge snapshot data" option ? Are there anything on the journalctl logs ?