XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    164 Posts 41 Posters 16.6k Views 33 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @benapetr
      last edited by

      @benapetr Check you have websocket support enabled. That's probably it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        darthkitty8
        last edited by

        XO6 is looking great so far.

        However, there is one thing I hope there may be an option to change in the future. Currently, in the tree view, VMs are shown under whichever host they are on. This works fine for a few nodes, but quickly becomes a pain with larger clusters (I operate clusters with 8+ nodes) because I have to check each host to find the VM. Is there any possibility of having an option to switch to a view similar to what VMware has, where the hosts are all at the top of the list, and then the VMs are all below it, regardless of which host they are on? I have attached a slightly modified version of an example vCenter screenshot to show better what I mean. I think this would make it much, much easier to find VMs in large clusters. Ideally, folders and/or resource groups with VMs nested under them could also be shown here, but that would require more work. Anyway, looking forward to how XO 6 progresses.

        793383b2-ea0c-4373-8089-16567241dd9e-image.jpeg

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Hi @darthkitty8 !

          Thanks for the feedback and idea, can you create it at https://feedback.vates.tech and use the "XO 6" tag? Thank you very much!

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Online
            DustinB @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/49/pool-view-rather-than-host-view

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              john.c @DustinB
              last edited by john.c

              @DustinB said:

              @olivierlambert https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/49/pool-view-rather-than-host-view

              So you’re interested in having it a bit more like when using VMware vSphere while, regarding VMs, hosts and pools? That could work, but still need a hosts view for each member of the pool. In the host’s view it needs to be able to see, what VMs are running on it.

              Also needs to be compatible with https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9430. If not already synced with NetBox, the pool and hosts should be linked by UUID when synced. So in other words the structure needs to be pool is linked by UUID to host by its UUID and then the same for VMs. So the VMs are linked by UIID to the host UUID.

              matiasst created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

              open Link VMs to Host Devices via UUID in NetBox Plugin #9430

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Online
                DustinB @john.c
                last edited by

                @john.c said:

                @DustinB said:

                @olivierlambert https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/49/pool-view-rather-than-host-view

                So you’re interested in having it a bit more like when using VMware vSphere while, regarding VMs, hosts and pools? That could work, but still need a hosts view for each member of the pool. In the host’s view it needs to be able to see, what VMs are running on it.

                Also needs to be compatible with https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9430. If not already synced with NetBox, the pool and hosts should be linked by UUID when synced. So in other words the structure needs to be pool is linked by UUID to host by its UUID and then the same for VMs. So the VMs are linked by UIID to the host UUID.

                Nothing in my post would restrict the view to only seeing VMs within a specific Pool, the view should be flexible enough to shows VMs in a pool.

                As it is now, you see all VMs that are running under a given host and then pool.

                This in and of itself could become tedious to manage/dig through.

                The potential remedy here would be to show all VMs in a pool, and on the given VM show the host where it's running.

                eed2974b-314b-4e25-a36a-15d88f8899a9-image.jpeg

                matiasst created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                open Link VMs to Host Devices via UUID in NetBox Plugin #9430

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J Offline
                  john.c @DustinB
                  last edited by john.c

                  @DustinB said:

                  @john.c said:

                  @DustinB said:

                  @olivierlambert https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/49/pool-view-rather-than-host-view

                  So you’re interested in having it a bit more like when using VMware vSphere while, regarding VMs, hosts and pools? That could work, but still need a hosts view for each member of the pool. In the host’s view it needs to be able to see, what VMs are running on it.

                  Also needs to be compatible with https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9430. If not already synced with NetBox, the pool and hosts should be linked by UUID when synced. So in other words the structure needs to be pool is linked by UUID to host by its UUID and then the same for VMs. So the VMs are linked by UIID to the host UUID.

                  Nothing in my post would restrict the view to only seeing VMs within a specific Pool, the view should be flexible enough to shows VMs in a pool.

                  As it is now, you see all VMs that are running under a given host and then pool.

                  This in and of itself could become tedious to manage/dig through.

                  The potential remedy here would be to show all VMs in a pool, and on the given VM show the host where it's running.

                  eed2974b-314b-4e25-a36a-15d88f8899a9-image.jpeg

                  Even in VMware vSphere there’s a hosts view, that shows things specific to a particular host. This includes VMs running on it, or are currently halted or suspended on it. As well as patches missing from the host, etc. Though it more roundabout to get to it under VMware vSphere.

                  matiasst created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                  open Link VMs to Host Devices via UUID in NetBox Plugin #9430

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Online
                    DustinB @john.c
                    last edited by

                    @john.c This is already viewable under each hosts in the pool.

                    3eb9d466-59e6-423a-8733-b9655d734103-image.jpeg

                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Online
                      DustinB
                      last edited by

                      Another suggestion, collapse non-running VMs into a single group, rather than having them listed individually.

                      https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/50/collapse-non-running-vms-into-group

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        john.c @DustinB
                        last edited by

                        @DustinB said:

                        @john.c This is already viewable under each hosts in the pool.

                        3eb9d466-59e6-423a-8733-b9655d734103-image.jpeg

                        Then in that case the pools based view restructure can go ahead. Was just concerned about ensuring that it’s still possible to access individual hosts.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post