XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Mirror backup: Progress status and ETA

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    3 Posts 3 Posters 15 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ForzaF Offline
      Forza
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I would like to have more progress information for the "Mirror backup" feature. Currently there is no progress other than how many VMs that have been copied so far.

      What I would like is:

      The total data size to be transferred plus how many VMs/backups that are left in the queue plus an approximate ETA. All this information should be available for XOA since it already knows what already exists in the source Remote.

      Additionally I would like the option to cancel a running Mirror backup. The Cancel button is disabled when I try:
      83f8b53e-1ff3-4f1a-aaec-5d53074f0e89-image.png

      There is also no Task for the Mirror job listed the XOA Tasks screen.

      I found an earlier question like this, but there was no answer there.
      https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11108/incremental-mirror-backup-progress-information-in-xoa

      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • olivierlambertO Online
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Ping @Team-XO-Backend

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • florentF Offline
          florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @Forza
          last edited by

          @Forza

          Cancelling a backup run is also on our roadmap ,as soon as we have done reworking the tasks to use xo-task on the full chain, and not an hybrid of various iteration of the tasks objects

          better tracking of the backup run is also on our roadmap , this is also linked to the task changes plus are some issues with the size on the remote before being able to do this

          In any case, both are on our backlog

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • First post
            Last post