XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CR backup with retention > 4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    6 Posts 3 Posters 193 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      McHenry
      last edited by

      Is it possible to have a CR backup with a retention value greater than 4 without generating the too many snapshots error?

      We have tested and concluded that as the new CR backups generate snapshots, a retention value of anything greater than 4 will generate a too many snapshots error.

      We wish to have hourly CR backups between 7am and 7pm so we need a retention value of 13; however, it does not appear that anything greater than 4 is possible without generating errors.

      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Question for @Team-XO-Backend

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • florentF Online
          florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @McHenry
          last edited by

          @McHenry said:

          oo many snapshots

          the warning limit is 3
          this make sense for a VM used for daily production, but we should maybe don't apply the same limit on replicated VM

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            McHenry @florent
            last edited by

            @florent

            So for CR backups it is safe to have a retention value of 13 and just ignore the warnings?

            florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • florentF Online
              florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @McHenry
              last edited by

              @McHenry yes

              your replicated VMmaye be a little slower, and removing these snapshot can lead to a big and slow coalesce, but these tradeoff can be worth it for replication

              we will try to clarify it for the 6.5 version ( end of may )

              florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • florentF Online
                florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @florent
                last edited by

                florent said:

                @McHenry yes

                your replicated VMmaye be a little slower, and removing these snapshot can lead to a big and slow coalesce, but these tradeoff can be worth it for replication

                we will try to clarify it for the 6.5 version ( end of may )

                ping @julienxovates

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                Register Login
                • First post
                  Last post