XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀
-
@stormi I was very thin on providing information, Sorry about that.
Using docker container XO I applied the patches and did something else for maybe 20 or 30 minutes. Then there were no more pending patches but also no mention of a necessary reboot. Usually I get two warning triangles, one for no-support for XO and the other that a reboot is necessary to apply the patches.
I was a bit suprised that the 88 patches didn't require a reboot but I wanted to do one anyway.
After putting the host in maintenance mode I pressed 'Smart Reboot' and let it do it's magic (the magic reboot loop that time).
Maybe I did not wait long enough. To be honest I don't really now what I would check to see if the patches are finished with applying. Usually when no there are no patches pending I do reboot. Seems I was just lucky with the Lenovo not having the problem.
-
@stormi I found that the interface-rename script broke with this update due to changes in python, specifically the line where the script concats two dict.keys(): the keys() method signature changed to return dict_keys, which doesn't have the add (or w/e it's named) method, so "a.keys()+b.keys()" fails now. I had to hand-edit the script to get it working, the fix is trivial: concat lists of keys rather than the keys directly.
-
-
@r0ssar00 hi, that issue would arise if you ran this script with python3, but it's interpreter is set as
/usr/bin/python
- How did you call this script, did you manually call it with python3? It should be ran by just running the command on the CLI eginterface-rename
-
@stormi
Updated ryzen 1700 late last week, and Threadripper 5975 and Epyc 7313p servers. No issues so far.
Installing fresh on epyc 9224 this week -
@ph7 said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta :
@stormi
I can not see anything underNetwork throughput
in XO-liteedit:
When I hover I can see the numbers but no graphI updated to latest version
Same again, no graphs -
@ph7 You seem to be the only one with this issue remaining. Maybe try a reinstall?
-
Hi there,
i was wondering for the install Image via ipxe, will there be something? I have it, that currently it only works with Legacy Bios and not the UEFI one.
-
@Houbsi The best we can do with ipxe is chaining to grub, because ipxe doesn't support multiboot2 in EFI mode.
-
I updated a test pool with 2 Intel NUC11TNHi5 hosts last week.
The updates went smooth. No issues after reboot.Can't wait till 8.3 goes live!
-
@fohdeesha I just did a reinstall of the interface-rename package to make sure I hadn't changed the shebang in the past, the reinstalled copy declares python3
-
I've notice the same python3 glitch.
You could manually amend /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/interface-rename-data/static-rules.conf if that's an option for you. -
@r0ssar00 @NoHeadroom Thanks for the feedback. You're both right, there's an issue. We will fix it ASAP.
-
I just pushed a few updates. Nothing worth mentioning, just a few minor fixes before the RC. The update might look big because XAPI was rebuilt, so many packages generated by this build are updated.
The interface-rename fix is to follow next, when it's ready.
-
@stormi updated 2 hosts (2 pools) and rebooted. No issues.
-
@NoHeadroom said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta :
I've notice the same python3 glitch.
You could manually amend /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/interface-rename-data/static-rules.conf if that's an option for you.Better avoid this kind of change to a file that was generated by the installer and is not meant to be touched.
Anyway, I've pushed the fixed
interface-rename
to thexcp-ng-base
repository. Just update, and this will be fixed. -
@stormi Update of my XCP-ng 8.3 test server through CLI (
yum update
) and rebooted. All VMs work as expected. -
@stormi
I ran the updates and now my graphs in XO-lite are back.
weird -
@stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta :
Better avoid this kind of change to a file that was generated by the installer and is not meant to be touched.
Anyway, I've pushed the fixed
interface-rename
to thexcp-ng-base
repository. Just update, and this will be fixed.Thanks for the quick fix and the hard work getting 8.3 to production.
Anyway, it's better to have an option b) if option a) fails
-
@NoHeadroom said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback :
Anyway, it's better to have an option b) if option a) fails
As you wish, but I won't support option b) in any case, so I prefer to mention it