XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X Offline
      XCP-ng-JustGreat
      last edited by

      Applied recent 87 updates to 3-node home-lab pool running XCP-ng 8.3 using XO from source on the latest commit. The update worked perfectly and a mix of existing Linux and Windows VMs are running normally after the update.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • A Offline
        archw
        last edited by

        11 hosts and thirty something VMs (windows, linux, bsd mix) and update went fine.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • V Offline
          vectr0n
          last edited by

          Updated 2 hosts with the current packages for 8.3. No issues during the package install and things have been running well so far. Keep up the amazing work XCP-NG/XO teams. 👍

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • patient0P Offline
            patient0
            last edited by

            Good Morning,

            I updated 2 1-node instances, one running on a Lenovo M920q and one running on a N5105 fanless devices. The Lenovo update run perfect but the N5105 device ended up in a boot loop. Both were on 8.3beta with the latest patches before.

            Turned out the initrd image wasn't build but /boot/initrd-4.19.0+1.img.cmd was there. Running the command in the /boot/initrd-4.19.0+1.img.cmd (new-kernel-pkg --install --mkinitrd "$@" 4.19.0+1) created it and the reboot was successful.

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @patient0
              last edited by

              @patient0 Any chance you had rebooted before the initrd had a chance to build?

              patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • patient0P Offline
                patient0 @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi I was very thin on providing information, Sorry about that.

                Using docker container XO I applied the patches and did something else for maybe 20 or 30 minutes. Then there were no more pending patches but also no mention of a necessary reboot. Usually I get two warning triangles, one for no-support for XO and the other that a reboot is necessary to apply the patches.

                I was a bit suprised that the 88 patches didn't require a reboot but I wanted to do one anyway.

                After putting the host in maintenance mode I pressed 'Smart Reboot' and let it do it's magic (the magic reboot loop that time).

                Maybe I did not wait long enough. To be honest I don't really now what I would check to see if the patches are finished with applying. Usually when no there are no patches pending I do reboot. Seems I was just lucky with the Lenovo not having the problem.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  r0ssar00 @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi I found that the interface-rename script broke with this update due to changes in python, specifically the line where the script concats two dict.keys(): the keys() method signature changed to return dict_keys, which doesn't have the add (or w/e it's named) method, so "a.keys()+b.keys()" fails now. I had to hand-edit the script to get it working, the fix is trivial: concat lists of keys rather than the keys directly.

                  fohdeeshaF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Thanks for your feedback @r0ssar00 , pinging @stormi and @yann

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • fohdeeshaF Offline
                      fohdeesha Vates 🪐 Pro Support Team @r0ssar00
                      last edited by

                      @r0ssar00 hi, that issue would arise if you ran this script with python3, but it's interpreter is set as /usr/bin/python - How did you call this script, did you manually call it with python3? It should be ran by just running the command on the CLI eg interface-rename

                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R Offline
                        ravenet @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi
                        Updated ryzen 1700 late last week, and Threadripper 5975 and Epyc 7313p servers. No issues so far.
                        Installing fresh on epyc 9224 this week

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • P Offline
                          ph7 @ph7
                          last edited by

                          @ph7 said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

                          @stormi
                          I can not see anything under Network throughput in XO-lite

                          edit:
                          When I hover I can see the numbers but no graph

                          I updated to latest version
                          Same again, no graphs

                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
                            last edited by

                            @ph7 You seem to be the only one with this issue remaining. Maybe try a reinstall?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H Offline
                              Houbsi
                              last edited by

                              Hi there,

                              i was wondering for the install Image via ipxe, will there be something? I have it, that currently it only works with Legacy Bios and not the UEFI one.

                              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Houbsi
                                last edited by

                                @Houbsi The best we can do with ipxe is chaining to grub, because ipxe doesn't support multiboot2 in EFI mode.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S Offline
                                  Strebor
                                  last edited by

                                  I updated a test pool with 2 Intel NUC11TNHi5 hosts last week.
                                  The updates went smooth. No issues after reboot.

                                  Can't wait till 8.3 goes live!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • R Offline
                                    r0ssar00 @fohdeesha
                                    last edited by

                                    @fohdeesha I just did a reinstall of the interface-rename package to make sure I hadn't changed the shebang in the past, the reinstalled copy declares python3

                                    N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • N Offline
                                      NoHeadroom @r0ssar00
                                      last edited by

                                      @r0ssar00

                                      I've notice the same python3 glitch.
                                      You could manually amend /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/interface-rename-data/static-rules.conf if that's an option for you.

                                      stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @NoHeadroom
                                        last edited by stormi

                                        @r0ssar00 @NoHeadroom Thanks for the feedback. You're both right, there's an issue. We will fix it ASAP.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by stormi

                                          I just pushed a few updates. Nothing worth mentioning, just a few minor fixes before the RC. The update might look big because XAPI was rebuilt, so many packages generated by this build are updated.

                                          The interface-rename fix is to follow next, when it's ready.

                                          M gskgerG P 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • M Offline
                                            manilx @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi updated 2 hosts (2 pools) and rebooted. No issues.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post