Unable to connect to backblaze b2

Pete

I might be having the same issue, which only appeared when I updated XO. There appears to be an issue when you use a key that is specific to a bucket. If I use an key that has permission on all buckets you don't get the not entitled message, but obviously that is not ideal.

I have tested the bucket with the s3 aws tools and it worked without issue.

I hope this helps.

florent

@Pete Hi, that is interesting

do you have a XOA or could you install a trial XOA in a VM with your backblaze credentials ? I would like to make some tests

Pete

@florent I have the free version of XOA as well as the XO from sources. I will add the B2 credentials to XOA.

florent

@Pete it would be great if you could open a ticket and a support tunnel, I will connect tomorrow morning ( Paris time, it's 9PM here ) to look for a solution

Pete

@florent I have created a new key that is bucket specific. I added the credentials but I assume I must need premium as it says feature unauthorised. I have already used the trial up. Not sure if that is an issue.

Do you need XOA connected to a xenserver? If not I don't mind leaving the tunnel open and you can take a look when you like.

There are a few test backups in the bucket, nothing I need.

Pete

This post is deleted!

florent

@Pete thanks I will look into it . You can delete your message with the id.
I will be able to find my way ( I will install the stand alone packages @xen-orchestra/fs that contains the s3 logic )

Pete

@florent No problem.

florent

@Pete it looks like the backblaze bucket was created with an encryption key . Can you put the encryption key on the XOA ?

Pete

@florent From the XO side, yes I was testing that. I have added the key.

florent

@Pete could you tests this branch in your xo from the source ?
fix_s3_permission_object_lock` from this PR https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/7195

fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

closed fix(s3): enable content md5 header even if user can't check it #7195

Pete

@florent I have installed the branch and that solves the problem

florent

@Pete great, I will merge it by the end of the week

olivierlambert

Nice job! Thanks for testing @Pete (hopefully this is also fixing @fred974's issue), and obviously thanks @florent for the fix

Pete

@olivierlambert No problem at all, it was my pleasure. I hope it helps other having the issue.