@Greg_E At this time we do not have the financial resources to purchase new boards.
Latest posts made by cairoti
-
RE: VM migration time
-
RE: VM migration time
@nikade @olivierlambert I created two Linux VMs and ran the below bandwidth and disk tests:
Testing using Dell Storage Network and local server volumes:
# iperf -c IPServer -r -t 600 -i 60 ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to IPServer, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 1] local IPClient port 54762 connected with IPServer port 5001 (icwnd/mss/irtt=14/1448/1321) [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.0000-60.0000 sec 51.6 GBytes 7.39 Gbits/sec [ 1] 60.0000-120.0000 sec 50.9 GBytes 7.28 Gbits/sec [ 1] 120.0000-180.0000 sec 51.2 GBytes 7.33 Gbits/sec [ 1] 180.0000-240.0000 sec 49.1 GBytes 7.03 Gbits/sec [ 1] 240.0000-300.0000 sec 50.8 GBytes 7.27 Gbits/sec [ 1] 300.0000-360.0000 sec 48.8 GBytes 6.99 Gbits/sec [ 1] 360.0000-420.0000 sec 51.7 GBytes 7.41 Gbits/sec [ 1] 420.0000-480.0000 sec 49.2 GBytes 7.05 Gbits/sec [ 1] 480.0000-540.0000 sec 50.1 GBytes 7.17 Gbits/sec [ 1] 540.0000-600.0000 sec 50.0 GBytes 7.16 Gbits/sec [ 1] 0.0000-600.0027 sec 503 GBytes 7.21 Gbits/sec [ 2] local IPClient port 5001 connected with IPServer port 33924 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 2] 0.0000-60.0000 sec 50.8 GBytes 7.28 Gbits/sec [ 2] 60.0000-120.0000 sec 51.4 GBytes 7.36 Gbits/sec [ 2] 120.0000-180.0000 sec 52.4 GBytes 7.51 Gbits/sec [ 2] 180.0000-240.0000 sec 50.3 GBytes 7.21 Gbits/sec [ 2] 240.0000-300.0000 sec 50.4 GBytes 7.22 Gbits/sec [ 2] 300.0000-360.0000 sec 51.0 GBytes 7.30 Gbits/sec [ 2] 360.0000-420.0000 sec 50.6 GBytes 7.24 Gbits/sec [ 2] 420.0000-480.0000 sec 50.4 GBytes 7.22 Gbits/sec [ 2] 480.0000-540.0000 sec 50.1 GBytes 7.18 Gbits/sec [ 2] 540.0000-600.0000 sec 50.9 GBytes 7.29 Gbits/sec [ 2] 0.0000-600.0125 sec 508 GBytes 7.28 Gbits/sec
Test using Dell Storage volumes and networking:
# iperf -c IPServer -r -t 600 -i 60 ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to IPServer, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 1] local IPClient port 50006 connected with IPServer port 5001 (icwnd/mss/irtt=14/1448/4104) [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.0000-60.0000 sec 33.7 GBytes 4.82 Gbits/sec [ 1] 60.0000-120.0000 sec 33.3 GBytes 4.77 Gbits/sec [ 1] 120.0000-180.0000 sec 33.4 GBytes 4.78 Gbits/sec [ 1] 180.0000-240.0000 sec 36.1 GBytes 5.16 Gbits/sec [ 1] 240.0000-300.0000 sec 36.7 GBytes 5.25 Gbits/sec [ 1] 300.0000-360.0000 sec 32.8 GBytes 4.69 Gbits/sec [ 1] 360.0000-420.0000 sec 33.4 GBytes 4.78 Gbits/sec [ 1] 420.0000-480.0000 sec 34.5 GBytes 4.93 Gbits/sec [ 1] 480.0000-540.0000 sec 35.3 GBytes 5.05 Gbits/sec [ 1] 540.0000-600.0000 sec 34.3 GBytes 4.91 Gbits/sec [ 1] 0.0000-600.0239 sec 343 GBytes 4.92 Gbits/sec [ 2] local IPClient port 5001 connected with IPServer port 52714 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 2] 0.0000-60.0000 sec 35.7 GBytes 5.12 Gbits/sec [ 2] 60.0000-120.0000 sec 31.6 GBytes 4.53 Gbits/sec [ 2] 120.0000-180.0000 sec 30.3 GBytes 4.34 Gbits/sec [ 2] 180.0000-240.0000 sec 35.1 GBytes 5.02 Gbits/sec [ 2] 240.0000-300.0000 sec 37.9 GBytes 5.42 Gbits/sec [ 2] 300.0000-360.0000 sec 37.5 GBytes 5.37 Gbits/sec [ 2] 360.0000-420.0000 sec 37.5 GBytes 5.37 Gbits/sec [ 2] 420.0000-480.0000 sec 37.1 GBytes 5.31 Gbits/sec [ 2] 480.0000-540.0000 sec 33.9 GBytes 4.86 Gbits/sec [ 2] 540.0000-600.0000 sec 35.0 GBytes 5.00 Gbits/sec [ 2] 0.0000-600.0036 sec 352 GBytes 5.03 Gbits/sec
Dell storage disk testing for each VM:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/teste1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 15,3566 s, 69,9 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/teste1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 19,0043 s, 56,5 MB/s
Server local disk test for each VM:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/teste1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 6,88148 s, 156 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/teste1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 5,83594 s, 184 MB/s
-
RE: VM migration time
@nikade Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 Gigabit Ethernet
-
RE: VM migration time
@olivierlambert See the settings:
- Network for pool:
- Network for host 1 of Pool:
- Network for host 2 of Pool:
-
Switch Dell: MTU 9216
-
MTU on all Storage SCSI interfaces:
-
RE: VM migration time
@nikade Yes, the VM is using shared storage. My storage network is 10G with the MTU of 9000. I don't use multipathing for interfaces. I'm thinking there's something wrong with the settings.
-
RE: VM migration time
@olivierlambert The interface used for direct communication with storage is eth5.
-
VM migration time
Hi. I created a Linux VM for testing. It has a 10 GB disk. The MTU of the communication network between the hosts in the pool and the Dell storage is 9000.
When I try to migrate this VM between storage volumes, using XO, the time is more than 6 minutes. Is this time normal for the size of the VM?
Could I check some settings to try to improve this time?
I saw the links below, but I still have questions:
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/6639/mtu-change
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/9193/help-with-iscsi-in-xcp-ng?_=1734355541195 -
RE: XO Lite: building an embedded UI in XCP-ng
@olivierlambert Your company is fantastic! Since I started testing XCP-NG and XO, I've seen a lot of new things. Congratulations again.
-
RE: XO Lite: building an embedded UI in XCP-ng
@olivierlambert Thanks for sharing this tool. I'll test it!
When reading the documentation, I had a question. If my internet link becomes unavailable, I will not be able to get XO Lite as I will not be able to download the code from Vates' servers to fully run the application. In the final version of XO Lite, do you intend to make the application completely available so that it can be run on the server side?