I recently implemented Kopia to replace Duplicati on some systems in my network. Now that I have more than a week of backups, I have gained appreciation for the retention tags they use in the KopiaUI program.

It does a good job of indicating why this version is being retained while also showing how many copies it is maintaining at each retention level. Really handy.

I just noticed the pin to the right. That lets you pin the snapshot so it won't be removed during cleanup. That's kinda cool to be able to single one out to hang on a bit longer, maybe while investigating something I suspect went wrong after that snapshot.

I'm not shilling for Kopia, I haven't used it enough to be sure I trust it yet. I am hoping XO could blatantly steal this kind of idea for backups, especially delta backups. I often get confused about how to get the retention I want when configuring backups and when I search for answers I see other people are also confused.

I guess for the sake of completeness, this is how KopiaUI lets me configure retention:

Thank you @florent. I'll do that.

Update: It worked.

@Forza Sorry, you were correct, I just mixed in another new issue. NFS is currently used only for backups. All my SRs are in local storage. It just happened that I now have backups failing not just because of the NFS issue but because of the VDI issue but I think it's a side-effect of the NFS problem causing the backup to get interrupted so now the VDI is stuck attached to dom0. I should have made that more clear or never mentioned the VDI issue at all.

@Forza Seems you are correct about showmount. On UNRAID running v4 showmount says there are no clients connected. I previously assumed that meant XO only connected during the backup. When I look at /proc/fs/nfsd/clients I see the connections.

On Synology, running v3, showmount does show the XO IP connected. Synology is supposed to support v4 and I have the share set to allow v4 but XO had trouble connecting that way. Synology is pretty limited in what options it lets me set for NFS shares.

Synology doesn't have rcpdebug available. I'll see if I can figure out how to get more logging info about NFS.

@olivierlambert Well, last night the backup completed just fine despite me taking no action.

I updated the XO to the latest commit when I got in this morning so hopefully the issue I had back in June don't come back.

@julien-f Thank you, that's super helpful and even easier than I thought it would be.

@florent Yeah, it's a lot of data, thankfully my other VMs are not nearly as large. I'm still not sure why it failed when none of the virtual drives are 2TB. The largest ones are configured with a 1.82TB max so even the capacity of the drive is less than the max.

I'm moving ahead with a file level sync attempt to see if that works.

To be clear, this post was as much or more about helping you figure out what's wrong so other people don't have the same issue, than it is about making this import work for my VM. With the flood you are getting from VMware refugees, I figure I'm not the only person with large drives to import. In other words, if there's something I can do to help you figure out why it fails then I'm willing to help.

@gskger Yeah, looks like it would be too tight. Ouch, those T4s are an order of magnitude more expensive. I'm definitely not interested in going that route.

@DustinB Nothing useful yet. I rebooted the servers and explored a bit in the BIOS to see if there were any settings, or to at least tweak some things to see if it would reset whatever went wrong in the reboot in mid December. While doing that I found that one of the two impacted servers was a version behind for the BIOS as well as for the iDRAC so I updated both of them. Unfortunately, that made no change to the fan speeds.

I've been out sick all of this week, so far, but I'll be looking into this more when I get back to the office. I've read about ways to manually control the fans but I'd rather not have to depend on a script running somewhere that makes those kinds of decisions, I'd much rather have iDRAC, or whatever normally controls it, handle it like it used to.

@olivierlambert It was DR. I was testing DR a while ago and after running it once I disabled the backup job so these backups have just been sitting on the server. I don't think I've rebooted that server since running that backup.