@manilx yes, that's it
we should change the "full backup interval" to "base/complete backup interval", to clarify what is a full . And we will do it.
@manilx yes, that's it
we should change the "full backup interval" to "base/complete backup interval", to clarify what is a full . And we will do it.
we are reworking the import code , along the new backup code ( https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10664/our-future-backup-code-test-it ) to unify the differetn disk transformation path
For now:
@andrewreid Yes, I can't wait to share it with everybody.
found it , there was not one, but 2 bugs
albeit small they were putting the xo backup in a incorrect state
the fix is here, and will be merged as soon as possible and then released as a patch for xoa users
https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/8780
really thank you everyone for the information
@RobWhalley saved the day
We are still working on it to better understand why it fixes and improve the situation
@RobWhalley nice work, I am testing it right now
@olivierlambert Nice catch
CBT will only be enabled when using purge data , I will fix the first one
(this is because CBT does not improve things without purge snaphot data , but has some edge case , so at least we won't enable it for nothing )
@olivierlambert @Gheppy that is a nice catch and it gives us a interesting clue
I am currently working on it
@manilx said in Our future backup code: test it!:
@florent Yes, just fine.
ok, so that's an issue with the mirror. I reproduced this night on my lab
I am working on a fix
@DevFlint the https://XOA_URL/rest/v0/tasks endpoint exists, but it's not yet documented through swagger
you should be able to add ?sync=true to the url to get the immediate result, but it can fail with a timeout if the creation takes too much time ( for example : migrating a big template )
found it , there was not one, but 2 bugs
albeit small they were putting the xo backup in a incorrect state
the fix is here, and will be merged as soon as possible and then released as a patch for xoa users
https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/8780
really thank you everyone for the information
@RobWhalley saved the day
We are still working on it to better understand why it fixes and improve the situation
@frank-s yes please
the more detailed the bug report is, the easier it is to fix
@Gheppy and nothing in the journalctl log ?
you're right, preferNbd default value is not the same on the front and the back, we'll fix it
Most of the backup issue are solved by either removing the snapshot, or having it fa enough so thaht the next backup will be a base one, with all the data
I am still not reproducing the nackup stuck issue after this commit https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/3c8efb4dc3e1cb3955521063047227849cfb6ed3
@Gheppy if this is what I think it should have been fixed by https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/3c8efb4dc3e1cb3955521063047227849cfb6ed3
@frank-s it looks like you need to select a base SR , even if you choose to assign different SR for each vdi ( or do not restore some vdi)
this looks like a UI bug