@MathieuRA
I also confirm that it works. Thank you
Posts
-
RE: XO5 breaks after defaulting to XO6 (from source)
-
RE: XO5 breaks after defaulting to XO6 (from source)
I managed to get it working, although the solution is not exactly to my liking.
I enabled both 80 and 443[http] [[http.listen]] port = 80 [[http.listen]] port = 443 cert = '/opt/ssl-local/fullchain.pem' key = '/opt/ssl-local/privkey.pem' # CRITICAL WEBSOCKET CONFIGURATION [http.upgrade] '/v5/api' = true '/v5/api/updater' = true # Make sure these routes are allowed for WebSocket upgrade [http.routes] '/v5/api' = { upgrade = true } '/v5/api/updater' = { upgrade = true } # List of files/directories which will be served. [http.mounts] '/v6' = '../../@xen-orchestra/web/dist/' '/' = '../xo-web/dist/' [redis] [remoteOptions] [plugins] -
RE: XO5 breaks after defaulting to XO6 (from source)
@ph7
On http it works, but without the lines below (those with /v5) in the config. On https it is the problem and it shouldn't be.... # List of files/directories which will be served. [http.mounts] '/v6' = '../../@xen-orchestra/web/dist/' '/' = '../xo-web/dist/' # List of proxied URLs (HTTP & WebSockets). [http.proxies] #'/v5/api' = 'ws://localhost:9000/api' #'/v5/api/updater' = 'ws://localhost:9001' #'/v5/rest' = 'http://localhost:9000/rest' ... -
RE: XO5 breaks after defaulting to XO6 (from source)
I don't run any scripts, I install according to the documentation.
nodejs 22
npm install -g npm git clone -b master https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra cp xo-server.toml /opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/.xo-server.toml cd /opt/xen-orchestra yarn yarn build # XO6 yarn run turbo run build --filter @xen-orchestra/web yarn cache clean systemctl restart xo-serverThe last compilation (b667bc8) works perfectly, this version is fine too, except for the links from v6 to v5 which are many.
In my opinion, v6 is not yet ready to be the default, too many links to v5.. -
RE: XO5 breaks after defaulting to XO6 (from source)
Same problem for me to.
The configuration file is like below, now. If I click on v6 from v5 it works but not the other way around.
And the links always go to /v5, but if v5 is the default what's the point?
I think that's the problem, instead of taking into account the config for the base they are explicitly passed in the links.The config
[http] [http.cookies] [[http.listen]] port = 443 cert = '/opt/ssl-local/fullchain.pem' key = '/opt/ssl-local/privkey.pem' [http.mounts] '/v6' = '../../@xen-orchestra/web/dist/' '/' = '../xo-web/dist/' # List of proxied URLs (HTTP & WebSockets). [http.proxies] '/v5/api' = 'ws://localhost:9000/api' '/v5/api/updater' = 'ws://localhost:9001' '/v5/rest' = 'http://localhost:9000/rest' [redis] [remoteOptions] [plugins]The problem with /v5

-
Permanent USB passthrough for smartcard
How do I make these settings permanent even if I update the server?
ALLOW: class=0a # CDC-Data ALLOW: class=0b # Smartcardfrom /etc/xensource/usb-policy.conf
Thank you
-
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
hmm,
I found the solution, after I read here on forum.
I enable this options and save and then disable and save and now is ok. Task is running again. It is running with last commit to
So the problem is with these settings which may not exist in the task created before the update.

-
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
@florent
The same result
Logs, but task is blocked on importing step{ "data": { "mode": "delta", "reportWhen": "always" }, "id": "1751375761951", "jobId": "109e74e9-b59f-483b-860f-8f36f5223789", "jobName": "tb-xxxx-xxxx-vrs7", "message": "backup", "scheduleId": "40f57bd8-2557-4cf5-8322-705ec1d811d2", "start": 1751375761951, "status": "pending", "infos": [ { "data": { "vms": [ "629bdfeb-7700-561c-74ac-e151068721c2" ] }, "message": "vms" } ], "tasks": [ { "data": { "type": "VM", "id": "629bdfeb-7700-561c-74ac-e151068721c2", "name_label": "tb-xxxx-xxxx-vrs7" }, "id": "1751375768046", "message": "backup VM", "start": 1751375768046, "status": "pending", "tasks": [ { "id": "1751375768586", "message": "snapshot", "start": 1751375768586, "status": "success", "end": 1751375772595, "result": "904c2b00-087f-45ae-9799-b6dad1680aff" }, { "data": { "id": "1afcdfda-6ede-3cb5-ecbf-29dc09ea605c", "isFull": true, "name_label": "tb-vrs1-RAID", "type": "SR" }, "id": "1751375772596", "message": "export", "start": 1751375772596, "status": "pending", "tasks": [ { "id": "1751375773638", "message": "transfer", "start": 1751375773638, "status": "pending" } ] }, { "data": { "id": "a5d2b22e-e4be-c384-9187-879aa41dd70f", "isFull": true, "name_label": "tb-vrs6-RAID", "type": "SR" }, "id": "1751375772611", "message": "export", "start": 1751375772611, "status": "pending", "tasks": [ { "id": "1751375773654", "message": "transfer", "start": 1751375773654, "status": "pending" } ] } ] } ] } -
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
@florent
I will update to the latest version and look at the logs.
Now I have version 7994fc52c31821c2ad482471319551ee00dc1472 -
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
@olivierlambert
I update to last commit, two more change is on git now
The problem still exists. From what I've noticed, export tasks start being created and then disappear shortly after. And then a few moments later the import tasks appear and it remains blocked like this.

Only up to this commit 7994fc52c31821c2ad482471319551ee00dc1472 (inclusive) , everything is ok.
EDIT: I read on the forum about similar problems. I don't have NBD enabled.
-
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
@olivierlambert
The problem start with this commit cbc07b319fea940cab77bc163dfd4c4d7f886776
This is ok 7994fc52c31821c2ad482471319551ee00dc1472 -
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
Hello, the problem has reappeared.
This time with a different behavior.
It hangs at this stage, and the export tasks do not even start/show.Info:
XCP-ng 8.3 up to date, XOCE commit fcefaaea85651c3c0bb40bfba8199dd4e963211c

-
RE: Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
I tested with commit e64c434 and it is ok.
Thank you -
Continuous replication problem with multiple SR
Hello,
I have problems with continuous replication, meaning that if I choose to do it on a single SR everything is ok but if I add two or more SRs it crashes and gives the error message below.
The problem is that it does nothing, it stays stuck and it is always the first SR in the list.
Info:- XCP-ng 8.3 up to date,
- XOCE commit 6ecab
Here it is with only one SR and everything is ok:
-
configuration:

-
transfer:

-
message
-

-

Here it is with two SRs
-
configuration:

-
transfer:

-
message:

-
log
{ "data": { "mode": "delta", "reportWhen": "always" }, "id": "1748599936065", "jobId": "109e74e9-b59f-483b-860f-8f36f5223789", "jobName": "********-vrs7", "message": "backup", "scheduleId": "40f57bd8-2557-4cf5-8322-705ec1d811d2", "start": 1748599936065, "status": "pending", "infos": [ { "data": { "vms": [ "629bdfeb-7700-561c-74ac-e151068721c2" ] }, "message": "vms" } ], "tasks": [ { "data": { "type": "VM", "id": "629bdfeb-7700-561c-74ac-e151068721c2", "name_label": "********-vrs7" }, "id": "1748599941103", "message": "backup VM", "start": 1748599941103, "status": "pending", "tasks": [ { "id": "1748599941671", "message": "snapshot", "start": 1748599941671, "status": "success", "end": 1748599945608, "result": "5c030f40-0b34-d1b4-10aa-f849548aa0b7" }, { "data": { "id": "1afcdfda-6ede-3cb5-ecbf-29dc09ea605c", "isFull": true, "name_label": "********-RAID", "type": "SR" }, "id": "1748599945609", "message": "export", "start": 1748599945609, "status": "pending", "tasks": [ { "id": "1748599948875", "message": "transfer", "start": 1748599948875, "status": "failure", "end": 1748599949159, "result": { "code": "HANDLE_INVALID", "params": [ "SR", "OpaqueRef:e6bbcba7-6a86-4d00-8391-3c1722b3552f" ], "call": { "duration": 6, "method": "VDI.create", "params": [ "* session id *", { "name_description": "********-sdb-256gb", "name_label": "********-sdb-256gb", "other_config": { "xo:backup:vm": "629bdfeb-7700-561c-74ac-e151068721c2", "xo:copy_of": "59ee458d-99c8-4a45-9c91-263c9729208b" }, "read_only": false, "sharable": false, "SR": "OpaqueRef:e6bbcba7-6a86-4d00-8391-3c1722b3552f", "tags": [], "type": "user", "virtual_size": 274877906944, "xenstore_data": {} } ] }, "message": "HANDLE_INVALID(SR, OpaqueRef:e6bbcba7-6a86-4d00-8391-3c1722b3552f)", "name": "XapiError", "stack": "XapiError: HANDLE_INVALID(SR, OpaqueRef:e6bbcba7-6a86-4d00-8391-3c1722b3552f)\n at XapiError.wrap (file:///opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)\n at file:///opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xen-api/transports/json-rpc.mjs:38:21\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)" } } ] }, { "data": { "id": "a5d2b22e-e4be-c384-9187-879aa41dd70f", "isFull": true, "name_label": "********-vrs6-RAID", "type": "SR" }, "id": "1748599945617", "message": "export", "start": 1748599945617, "status": "pending", "tasks": [ { "id": "1748599948887", "message": "transfer", "start": 1748599948887, "status": "pending" } ] } ] } ] } -
No more options for export
I have a problem after commit 6e508b0.
I can no longer select the export method.
With 6e508b0, all are okCommit a386680


Commit 6e508b0


-
RE: VUSBs options for backup/snapshot
At a certain point, I don't know when because we are talking about a home lab here.
I could attach the USB HDD same as a virtual HDD and I could put exclusions on it -
RE: VUSBs options for backup/snapshot
More detailed:
At the moment I have this:
A VM with TrueNAS that has:- sda 100Gb, the operating system
- sdb 2Tb, the first hdd to use in TrueNAS
- sdc 2Tb USB, clone of sdb 2Tb made in TrueNAS
I want to backup the TrueNAS system, which means only sda
I excluded sdb via [NOBAK] [NOSNAP]
But I can no longer exclude sdc via [NOBAK] [NOSNAP] -
VUSBs options for backup/snapshot
Is there a possibility to implement the same options as for disks, for VUSB to?
I mean the option to use [NOBAK] [NOSNAP].
Before the update, I saw the USB-HDD as a normal disk that I could attach to VM and use the [NOBAK] option to excluded it from the backup.
I have XCP-ng 8.3 is installed on the server. -
RE: XO cant Snapshot itself ?
This is what I was thinking
- [NOSNAP] to be like SDA and disk 3
- [NOBAK] to be with SDA and disk 2
- In both cases disk 4 is excluded
