Hi
Indeed. We will see how we can fix this bug.
Thanks
Posts made by MathieuRA
-
RE: Tag management for Storage not able to choose from existing tags
-
RE: Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490
@JamfoFL As the bug appears to be non-trivial, I’ll create the issue on our end, and then we’ll see with the team to schedule this task. We’ll keep you updated here.
-
RE: Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490
Hi. I am finally able to reproduce the end of alert issue.
However, I was only able to reproduce if I used the "ALL *" options and not by manually selecting the objects to monitor. Can you confirm that you are usingAll running VMs/Hosts/SRs
? -
RE: XCP-ng 8.2.1 Guest UEFI Secure Boot
I see that the bug is actually already fixed on the latest version (
5.98.1
). -
RE: XCP-ng 8.2.1 Guest UEFI Secure Boot
Hi @TwoPlus1, thanks for the report. I can reproduce the bug. We will fix this for the next release (
5.99
)` -
RE: Question on permissions
Hi @rtjdamen
In the VM's advanced tab, in the
Misc
section, you should seeResource set
with a selector.
-
RE: Attach PCIs - Not enough permissions
Hi
Fix available on the master branch.
Commit: b539b -
RE: Attach PCIs - Not enough permissions
Hi @abudef
A fix is available on the branchfix-attach-pci
-
RE: Attach PCIs - Not enough permissions
Hi @abudef thanks for the report. I spotted where the bug came from and I will fix it soon.
-
RE: XO - enable PCI devices for pass-through - should it work already or not yet?
@abudef As workaround, you can run an XO locally, shutdown all your VMs from your host and toggle your PCI from your local XO.
Otherwise it's also possible doing it with command line.In the modal, if we simply change the buttons like this:
[Reboot, Force Reboot, Cancel]
, instead of[Ok, Cancel]
would that be sufficient? -
RE: XO - enable PCI devices for pass-through - should it work already or not yet?
So the error is "normal".
XOA tries to evacuate your host before restarting it, but your host's VMs have "nowhere to go" since you don't have another host.
Are you using XO from sources? -
RE: XO - enable PCI devices for pass-through - should it work already or not yet?
Hi @abudef
how many host do you have in your pool?
-
RE: Pool overview - Some suggestions
Ho, i see the it was already planned to be in the pool dashboard for XO6.
Not yet designed BTW. -
RE: Pool overview - Some suggestions
Ok, we take the request into account, and we transmit the information to our XO6 designer! Thanks
-
RE: XO - Restore Health Check
At least for XO5, there is no trivial way to do that.
So will probably need to wait for XO6.
-
RE: XO - Restore Health Check
@nikade said in XO - Restore Health Check:
OK, so it is possible!
Reply
If the VM is deleted, we can no longer find it, so we cannot retrieve the
name label
property of an object that does not exist. -
RE: Pool overview - Some suggestions
Hi @nikade
What data should be displayed in this storage tab?
Thehome/storage
view with a filter is not enough? (as @Andrew said, you can click on 9XDISKS to go directly to that view with the correct filter) -
RE: XO - Restore Health Check
@nikade said in XO - Restore Health Check:
of VM is recorded -> $name is listed as a hyperlink in the VM column -> VM is deleted -> $name is listed as text in the VM column.
No we can't, we do not have direct access to the VM name.
We must first find the VM using an ID and then return thename_label
property of the VM object. -
RE: XO - Restore Health Check
Hi, @nikade
As you said, the VM is deleted at the end of the health-check, and it will not be trivial to keep the VM name.BTW, maybe we can add a column.
So the currentVM
column will point to the VM used for the health-check (no change), and the new column will point to the backuped VM. What do you think? -
RE: Multi VMs tags
@Mathieu
Hi, it's not actually possible, but it's planned for XO6