@MajorP93 said:
@rzr Since the targeted test window is over by now, I wonder: what are your plans regarding this set of patches? Will it be released soon?
yes this is the plan, we're a bit slower this time because the iso publication is a longer process, but afaik no issue are spotted so far, thank you for your patience.
I have been in the Network Enterprise business for 28 years. I live in Virginia which is heavily populated with Data Centers and adding more all the time.
However, we have quite a few customers especially municipalities which are saying NO to having anything hosted with cloud computing due to security and endless rising cost. We have been deploying xcp-ng in quite a few installations, on customer premise. I think VATES will find there is a whole other market in these areas they can reach.
That being said, Thanks to VATES and all who have worked on solutions for this! It truly benefits everyone!
@Dezerd To check if there is perhaps a hung process that is interfering. I assume there is sufficient memory and storage space. DO any I/O disk errors show in /var/log. SMlog ? Just to clarify. are there VMs that do not show any such error condition?
@MajorP93 My mistake. No I have not rebooted the hosts yet. https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/107164 I am aware that the reboot is needed for it to be picked up, I went ahead and installed from test so that if host crashes again it is there.
Merci beaucoup pour vos retours !
@nathanael-h : C'est l'étape suivante !!! J'ai découvert cluster API le mois dernier et j'ai déja testé sur d'autres plateforme ! ça déchire !!! Je ne savais pas qu'il y avait un support de XCP-ng ! Je finis ma série d'article pour une installation classique et je bascule sur cluster API !
@ataxyanetwork Merci pour ton repo. Je vais regarder ça
