Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    142 Topics
    4k Posts
    A
    @gduperrey Installed on home lab via rolling pool update and both host updated no issues and vms migrated back to 2nd host as expected this time. fingers crossed work servers have the same luck. I do have open support ticket from last round of updates for work servers. Waiting for response before installing patches.
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    C
    If anyone can point me to documentation on this, I would greatly appreciate it. I have looked in the docs and searched for an answer and come up empty.
  • 3k Topics
    28k Posts
    R
    The clue is in your own observation: re-enabling the disabled manual job made all VMs appear. The Backup Restore (V5) view likely filters its restore list based on which backup jobs are currently enabled, if a job is disabled, its associated VMs may not be indexed into the restore view even if backups from that job exist on the remote. This is different from how the older restore view worked, where it would scan the remote and show everything regardless of job state. The V5 restore view appears to be building its list from job metadata rather than from a direct remote scan. A few things worth verifying: Check whether the one VM that does appear is covered by a currently-enabled job, and the others are only covered by disabled jobs. If that pattern holds consistently, that's the root cause and it's a V5 behavior change worth reporting to the XO team. In the XO UI, go to Backup → Jobs and check which jobs are enabled. If you temporarily enable all jobs, does the restore list show all VMs? And when you disable some again, does it immediately drop those VMs from the list? If the behavior is confirmed, filing it against the backup v5 restore view filter logic would be useful, the restore UI should show all VMs that have restorable backups on the remote, regardless of whether the originating job is currently active or not. Given you're on a test branch focused on reactivity fixes, this could also be a rendering/state issue where the component isn't re-fetching when job state changes, the list gets built once and doesn't update until you navigate away and back.
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    44 Topics
    731 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Different use cases: Ceph is better with more hosts (at least 6 or 7 minimum) while XOSTOR is better between 3 to 7/8. We might have better Ceph support in the future for large clusters.
  • 34 Topics
    101 Posts
    B
    @AtaxyaNetwork Merci becuoup pour ce retour. Je vais compléter l'article dans ce sens.